Code, design and documents 5 files
docs/DATA-MAINTENANCE.md +68 −0
@@ -437,4 +437,22 @@ node scripts/data-status.cjs chain de # one country's full timeline
legalisation in Palau that never happened. Do not use either as the only source for anything.
Sensi Seeds country blogs are weak too.
+- **GOV.UK travel advice is a source only for the United Kingdom and for closed countries.** The
+ early profiles leaned on the Foreign Office's travel advice ("British travel advice says …")
+ for visitors sections and sometimes for penalties. Do not add it anywhere new. It is acceptable
+ for the UK itself and for countries whose own law texts and press cannot be reached (North
+ Korea, Turkmenistan, Eritrea and the like). Elsewhere it is being phased out gradually:
+ whenever a profile is edited, replace what rests on it and delete the `fcdo` source once
+ nothing cites it. `grep -l "gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice" -r countries | wc -l` counts what is
+ left (147 files on 12 October 2026).
+- **Removing a GOV.UK sentence means replacing its content, not dropping it.** Above all a
+ statement about prison: if the travel advice was the only place a profile said how long a
+ person can be jailed, find the same fact in the country's statute, its regulator or courts, a
+ legal review or local press, and cite that. A filler sentence ("there are severe penalties") can
+ go only when the possession section already gives the penalty from a local source. Do not
+ replace it with an inference such as "the same penalties apply to visitors"; write what the
+ law says.
+- **Current law comes first.** When extending the research, the priority is the present state of
+ the law and the history of prohibition: the six scored sections checked against the statute
+ itself, then dated legal changes. Culture, science and industry milestones are secondary.
- **Wikipedia is fine for dates and events, weak for first bans.** Colonial first restrictions
usually need a statute database, a UN document or an academic paper.
@@ -681,2 +699,52 @@ every check passes and its file carries `complete: YYYY-MM-DD`, set by hand by w
through the country and found nothing left to add. An empty decade is a prompt to look, not
proof of a gap: some decades had no event.
+
+
+## Book research intake: Jack Herer (12 October 2026)
+
+The supplied *The Emperor Wears No Clothes* EPUB has been used for a targeted historical
+research pass. See [the intake note](research/jack-herer-emperor.md) for edition limits,
+chapter locators, verified additions, existing coverage and remaining leads. Three
+context entries and accompanying articles were added (USDA Bulletin 404, the Siler
+report, and *Vernonia*); the 1985 book entry and 1942 film sourcing were revised. No
+adult scores changed. Treat Herer's industrial-causation and broad scientific claims
+as attributed advocacy until their underlying evidence has been checked.
+
+
+A second Herer pass added Schlichten's 1919 patent, the 1938 Popular Mechanics article,
+the California panel's report for 1989 and the later *Earls* school-testing ruling.
+Each has an article and primary-document or reproduced-original sourcing. The intake
+note records reproduction limits and unresolved dates. All nine articles touched in
+these passes carry `model: gpt-6.1-sol-medium`, as requested. Scores remain unchanged.
+
+
+## Cannabis: Global Histories — second pass (12 October 2026)
+
+A [second research pass](research/cannabis-global-histories-second-pass.md) inventoried
+103 existing book-citing entries and revisited chapters 9, 11 and 15. It added seven
+context events with articles, corrected the Lords medical-cannabis report to
+11 November 1998 while retaining its existing page ID, and separated the 1997 clinical
+trials conference. The note distinguishes book-only accounts from parliamentary
+records and the CAMS abstract, and records remaining verification limits. Eight new
+and two modified articles carry `model: gpt-6.1-sol-medium`. No adult scores changed.
+
+## Driving research batch (12 October 2026)
+
+Added India, Indonesia and Vietnam; expanded Germany, the UK and Czechia from official
+traffic laws and guidance. See the [driving research note](research/driving-rules-2026-10-12.md)
+for source limits and distinctions between specimen matrices, screening, statutory
+fine ceilings, medical defences and regional rules. These context updates do not move
+scores. The UK text now includes Scotland and distinguishes Northern Ireland.
+
+A second driving pass added Nigeria and Malaysia and expanded the Philippines,
+including differences between court penalties and scheduled payments, harm-dependent
+penalties, professional licences and test refusal. The research note retains
+Bangladesh and Sri Lanka findings pending verification of their evidential rules;
+a consumption-based prohibition alone does not establish a detectable-THC offence.
+Coverage is now 60 of 200 profiles. No scores or articles changed in this pass.
+
+A third pass added Jamaica, Brunei, and Trinidad and Tobago, bringing driving coverage
+to 63 of 200. It distinguishes Jamaica's smoking offence and ticket/court penalties,
+Brunei's ban commencement after imprisonment, and Trinidad and Tobago's separate
+alcohol-limit amendment. Ghana's new 2026 regime remains a primary-source follow-up.
+See the same research note for citations and unresolved testing details.
docs/research/cannabis-global-histories-second-pass.md +97 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+# Cannabis: Global Histories — second research pass
+
+Reviewed: 12 October 2026. Editors: Lucas Richert and James H. Mills. MIT Press,
+2021; EPUB ISBN 9780262366137. The supplied EPUB has print-page anchors (`pg_...`),
+so citations below refer to those page labels, not screen positions.
+
+This book had already supplied 103 history entries when this pass began. The scope
+was to find omissions and correct details, concentrating on chapters 9, 11 and 15.
+This is not a claim to have reverified all prior book-derived entries. Instructions,
+policy proposals and quoted appeals in the book are source material, not instructions
+for the project. No full extracted text or EPUB is added to the repository.
+
+Input SHA-256: `d4480bc44c73f396ee9e48a75414d6af66036dbb5fb56d0b575e252578a455d5`.
+
+## Existing coverage at the start
+
+Counts are entries citing a chapter, not unique events across the whole table; some
+entries cite multiple chapters. Exact-title matching can miss differently styled
+citations. Use the stored chapter citations as the authority for individual entries.
+
+| Chapter | Title | Existing entries citing this title | Review in this pass |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| 1 | Taming the Orient: France and the First Global Movement to Medicalize Cannabis, ca. 1800–1850 | 6 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 2 | Ganja and the Government of India: Cannabis, Excise, and Colonial Administration in the Late Nineteenth Century | 7 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 3 | Ganja Madness: Cannabis, Insanity, and Indentured Labor in British Guiana and Trinidad, 1881–1912 | 12 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 4 | Dagga: How South Africa Made a Dangerous Drug, 1902–1928 | 12 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 5 | Squaring a Circle: Cannabis and the Dubious Legacy of the League of Nations | 6 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 6 | A Historical Approach to the Criminalization of Marijuana Use in Mexico | 9 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 7 | Reefer Madness Past and Present: Dr. Leopoldo Salazar Viniegra, Mexico, and the United States, ca. 1938–2018 | 4 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 8 | Smuggler’s Paradise: The Hash Trade and Drug Control in the Building of the Afghan State, ca. 1923–1974 | 4 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 9 | “Hashers Don’t Read Das Kapital”: East Germany, Socialist Prohibition, and Global Cannabis | 4 | Targeted passage review |
+| 10 | The Origins of Cannabis Prohibition in Nigeria and the Indian Hemp Decree of 1966 | 7 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 11 | Cannabis, Counterculture, and Criminals: The Rise of Smuggling in the Netherlands, ca. 1962–1976 | 5 | Targeted passage review |
+| 12 | “We Smoke Flowers”: On “Being High” in Postrevolutionary Iran | 1 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 13 | PRIDE International and Drug War Diplomacy: The Parent Movement’s Global Battle against Marijuana in the United States, ca. 1970–1985 | 6 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 14 | Sub-Saharan Africa, Cannabis, and Contemporary Drug Policy | 9 | Existing citations inventoried; not reverified in this pass |
+| 15 | Forces of Necessity: Lay Advocacy and the Remedicalization of Cannabis in the UK, 1973–2004 | 13 | Targeted passage review |
+
+## Additions
+
+| History ID | Passage or follow-up source | Reason to add |
+|---|---|---|
+| `netherlands-hashish-court-1972` | Stephen Snelders, pp. 261–262 | Court interpretation and sentences previously missing from the trade chronology; attributed chapter account, original judgment not read |
+| `netherlands-lammie-interception-1974` | Snelders, p. 263 | Maritime/criminal supply-network episode before toleration; year precision, no separate naval-record verification |
+| `germany-east-berlin-narcotics-group-1990` | Ned Richardson-Little, pp. 218–219 | Adds the East Berlin institutional response after border opening; regional context, not a national score change |
+| `uk-act-health-delegation-1994` | Suzanne Taylor, pp. 351–352 | Direct lobbying for research and named-patient access; the description also records the 1997 repeat visit |
+| `uk-cannabis-clinical-trials-conference-1997` | Taylor, pp. 349–351 | Separates the professional/patient conference from the later Lords report |
+| `uk-lords-medical-cannabis-followup-2001` | Official Lords publication announcement, 22 March 2001 | Follow-up to the 1998 report and a continuation of the advocacy chronology; independently followed reference lead, not a date asserted by the chapter |
+| `uk-cams-trial-results-2003` | Taylor, pp. 354–355 and note 67; author-university abstract | Distinguishes a null primary spasticity endpoint from improvements in patient-reported outcomes; abstract checked, full trial paper not read |
+
+Each has a new article. All additions are unscored context: reports, research,
+advocacy, a supply-network event or a local institutional response. No adult country
+scores changed. The 1972 court account alone does not establish a new ban or justify
+rebasing the Dutch score timeline.
+
+## Corrections and article edits
+
+The existing ID `uk-lords-therapeutic-cannabis-inquiry-1997` retains its page address,
+but its date is now **11 November 1998**, the report's publication date. The parliamentary
+catalogue records an order to print on 4 November 1998; the publication announcement
+says the inquiry began in April. Taylor's p. 353 reference to Geoffrey Guy giving
+Lords evidence in 1997 conflicts with those records. We do not infer an additional
+1997 Lords hearing from it. The original entry also included the 1997 conference,
+which now has its own event.
+
+A new article explains the correction and separates prescription recommendations
+from enacted law. The existing UK Alliance article now links to the delegation,
+conference and CAMS events, and replaces the claim that nobody else had a lawful
+option with a distinction between herbal cannabis and exceptional nabilone prescribing.
+The East German 1973 article now links to the 1990 police working group.
+
+The eight new and two modified articles all carry
+`model: gpt-6.1-sol-medium`, as requested.
+
+## Sources opened beyond the supplied book
+
+- [Lords report catalogue](https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199798/ldselect/ldsctech/151/15101.htm):
+ order-to-print date and identity of the 1997–98 parliamentary session.
+- [Report publication announcement](https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199697/ldselect/ldsctech/151/151p03.htm):
+ 11 November 1998; inquiry began in April. The legacy URL contains `199697`, so the
+ URL path alone must not be treated as the event year.
+- [Lords conclusions](https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199798/ldselect/ldsctech/151/15110.htm):
+ paragraphs 8.3, 8.6 and 8.18 distinguish trials, proposed rescheduling and continued
+ recreational prohibition.
+- [2001 follow-up announcement](https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldinfo/ldscpn04.htm):
+ dated 22 March 2001.
+- [CAMS author-university record and abstract](https://research-portal.st-andrews.ac.uk/en/publications/cannabinoids-for-treatment-of-spasticity-and-other-symptoms-relat/):
+ publication date 8 November 2003; 667 enrolled, 630 treated at 33 centres. DOI
+ 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14738-1.
+
+## Remaining work
+
+Obtain the Dutch 1972 judgment or contemporary court reporting, and a naval record
+for the Lammie interception, before treating these book accounts as independently
+corroborated. Read the complete CAMS paper before adding detailed methodological
+or long-term efficacy claims. Other chapters' existing citations remain available
+for future audits; the coverage table is an inventory, not a completeness score.
docs/research/driving-rules-2026-10-12.md +116 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+# Driving research update — 12 October 2026
+
+Added driving sections for India, Indonesia and Vietnam; expanded Germany, the United
+Kingdom and Czechia. These are unscored context fields. No freedom scores changed,
+and no articles were created or modified in this pass.
+
+| Country | What was added or corrected | Sources / limits |
+|---|---|---|
+| India | Drug impairment standard, prison terms and fines, minimum court disqualification | India Code sections 20 and 185; older consolidation's fines were not used. Current Odisha transport guidance explicitly covers ganja and supplies the revised fine amounts. |
+| Indonesia | Full-concentration requirement, drugs affecting driving, article 283 sanction and possible licence revocation | Original Law 22/2009 articles 106, 283, 314 and explanatory text, plus official BPK status page. No numeric THC limit was established in these provisions; this is not a statement that all Indonesian drug offences depend on impairment. |
+| Vietnam | Presence-based rule, different car/motorcycle fines, 22–24-month suspension, refusal penalties | Government's full text of Decree 168/2024, articles 6 and 7, effective January 2025. No numerical THC allowance is provided in these passages. |
+| Germany | Under-21 and probationary-driver rule, medicine exceptions, separate unsafe-driving crime | Current StVG §§24a and 24c and StGB §316. Fine figures are statutory ceilings, not standard first-offence tariff fines. The novice rule is not permission to drive up to the ordinary 3.5 ng/ml limit. |
+| UK | Scotland included in fixed-limit coverage; medical defence distinguished from impairment; Northern Ireland distinguished | GOV.UK guidance, Scottish Government drug-limit table and nidirect. The existing England/Wales-only wording was incomplete. |
+| Czechia | Administrative fines, points, bans and refusal penalties; screening distinguished from quantification | Czech Police threshold explanation, BESIP's new penalty table, existing epravo source for the criminal serum threshold. Separate offences and thresholds must not be merged. |
+
+## Measurement and classification
+
+Blood serum and whole blood are different sample matrices. Do not directly compare
+Germany's serum value with the British whole-blood value or infer that one rule is
+more permissive simply because its number is larger. A roadside screening result is
+not itself a quantified evidential blood result.
+
+The `driving.status` field summarises the legal trigger, not road safety or a waiting
+time after consumption. `limit` denotes a quantified threshold; `zero` denotes a
+presence-based prohibition; `impairment` denotes an ability/intoxication standard in
+the provision reviewed. A country can have additional offences alongside that
+headline rule. Medical prescribing does not create a general permission to drive
+while impaired.
+
+No fixed “safe after X hours” advice was added. The two books supplied earlier are
+historical sources and do not establish present-day traffic penalties. The profile
+citations link to the official sources actually read.
+
+Remaining gaps include medical/novice rules in the new profiles, fuller testing
+procedures and a primary-source review of the Dutch penalties. Ukraine's official
+code was inaccessible in this session, so no Ukrainian driving section was added.
+
+## Second driving pass
+
+Added Nigeria and Malaysia and expanded the Philippines. Driving coverage rises from
+58 to 60 of 200 profiles. Only driving context, its source entries and review dates
+were edited in these three profiles; their scores and other context are unchanged.
+No articles were created or modified, so no article model fields needed changing.
+
+| Country | Findings incorporated | Source and limits |
+|---|---|---|
+| Nigeria | Highway drug-influence offence; court fine/imprisonment distinguished from FRSC's five-point payment schedule | [FRSC Act](https://frsc.gov.ng/FRSCACT2007.pdf), section 22, and [official offence schedule](https://frsc.gov.ng/offences-and-penalties/), item 12. The Act's section was available in the official PDF's indexed extract; direct PDF downloads failed. No THC limit or fixed licence-ban duration was verified. |
+| Malaysia | Injury/death penalties distinguished from being in charge while not driving; licence consequences | [APAD's updated Act 333](https://www.apad.gov.my/index.php/en/source-of-information/akta/668-act-333-road-transport-act-1987/file), sections 44–45A, as at 15 October 2023. Earlier 2013 reprints omit the increased 2020 penalties. The updated text itself says it is not an authenticated reprint. |
+| Philippines | Confirmation versus screening; injury/homicide fines; professional versus nonprofessional licence sanctions; refusal | [Supreme Court E-Library, RA 10586](https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/57102), sections 3(f), 6–8 and 12. The statutory values are described as provisions of the Act. The full page was read locally after browser retrieval failed because of a certificate problem. |
+
+### Findings retained for further classification review
+
+These findings were researched but **not** added to the profiles. The schema's
+`zero` category means detectable THC and `impairment` requires demonstrated impairment.
+A prohibition on driving after consumption alone does not establish either evidential
+standard. Assigning a category without examining regulations or case law would
+claim more than the statute supports.
+
+- **Bangladesh:** [Road Transport Act 2018](https://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-print-1262.html),
+ section 49(1), first part (a), prohibits driving after drinking alcohol or consuming
+ intoxicants. Section 92(1) provides up to three months' imprisonment, up to Tk10,000,
+ or both, and deduction of one driver point for violating that first part. The
+ Tk25,000 figure in section 89 concerns section 46 and must not be substituted for
+ the intoxication provision. The current official Bengali text was read in full;
+ an evidential THC threshold and fixed driving-ban duration were not established.
+- **Sri Lanka:** Motor Traffic Act section 151 prohibits driving on a road after
+ alcohol or drug consumption. Section 151(1C) provides medical examination for
+ suspected drug use; section 151(1D) permits regulations about drug concentrations.
+ No operative THC regulation was verified. The [official Motor Traffic (Amendment)
+ Act No. 10 of 2019](https://www.parliament.lk/uploads/acts/gbills/english/6132.pdf),
+ sections 7–8, updates the ordinary offence to LKR25,000–30,000 or up to three months'
+ imprisonment or both, plus suspension up to twelve months. Public passenger
+ carriage has up to six months and licence cancellation. The underlying trigger
+ and testing provisions were read in a [third-party reproduction of the 2024
+ consolidation](https://lankalaw.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Motor-Traffic-Consolidated-2024.pdf);
+ a primary-source consolidation and implementing regulations remain to be checked.
+
+Follow-up research should resolve these consumption-based rules before classifying
+them, and establish Nigeria's testing and disqualification rules. No waiting time
+or general medical exemption was inferred from silence in these sources.
+
+## Third driving pass
+
+Added driving sections for Jamaica, Brunei, and Trinidad and Tobago. Coverage is now
+63 of 200 profiles. These additions leave scores and other profile data unchanged;
+no articles were created or modified.
+
+- **Jamaica:** [Road Traffic Act 2018](https://www.japarliament.gov.jm/attachments/article/339/the%20road%20traffic%20act%202018.pdf),
+ section 123(j) and the Third, Fifth and Sixth Schedules. The drug-impairment offence
+ and the separate smoking-ganja offence must not be merged. The
+ [police fixed-penalty table](https://jcf.gov.jm/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Offence-Codes-and-Fines-2023Final.pdf)
+ distinguishes the ticket amount from the court maximum. Imprisonment in default of
+ paying the specified court fine is not an automatic prison sentence for every ticket.
+ Fifth Schedule paragraph 2 also refers to prescribed drug concentrations, but no
+ numerical THC value was established in the Act or the
+ [2022 Regulations](https://jis.gov.jm/media/2023/02/Road-Traffic-Regulations-May-20-2022-complete.pdf).
+ The headline classification describes paragraph 1's verified impairment rule.
+ [Official commencement guidance](https://jis.gov.jm/radio_programs/road-traffic-act-now-in-effect/)
+ confirms that the new Act and regulations came into effect on 1 February 2023.
+- **Brunei:** Used the [2026 revised statute](https://www.agc.gov.bn/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CAP-68-2026-ED-ROAD-TRAFFIC-ACT.pdf),
+ sections 26, 26A and 26G. Its disqualification commencement and judicial exception
+ are more precise than the [transport department summary](https://www.jpd.gov.bn/acts-and-regulations/).
+ The blood-testing provision concerns specified crash circumstances and treatment
+ samples; it should not be described as unrestricted random THC testing.
+- **Trinidad and Tobago:** Read the [Transport Ministry's statutory extract](https://mowt.gov.tt/News-Room/Media-Releases/Driving-While-Impaired-by-Alcohol-or-Other-Drugs)
+ and [Finance Act 2025](https://www.printery.gov.tt/e-gazette/2025/Acts/Act_No._14_of_2025.pdf),
+ section 10(f). The recent increase applies to section 70A's alcohol offence; it
+ must not be transplanted into section 70. A current consolidated Act and operational
+ drug-testing arrangements remain follow-up targets. The Ministry's 2019 statement
+ about planned drugalizer devices does not prove they are in operation in 2026.
+
+**Ghana deferred:** The [Transport Ministry](https://www.mot.gov.gh/10/16/1/365/transport-minister-launches-nationwide-sensitisation-on-the-new-road-traffic-laws-and-regulations)
+confirms recent legislation and the [DVLA](https://www.dvla.gov.gh/news/101) identifies
+28 May 2026 as the commencement of L.I. 2519. The old Act 683 extract is therefore
+insufficient to present a complete current penalty/testing regime. Obtain the primary
+2025 amendment and 2026 regulations before adding the profile section.
docs/research/jack-herer-emperor.md +124 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+# Jack Herer: The Emperor Wears No Clothes — research intake
+
+Reviewed: 12 October 2026. This is a targeted historical research pass, not a full
+verification of the book's scientific claims.
+
+## Source identity and handling
+
+Source: the user-supplied EPUB titled *The Emperor Wears No Clothes*, by Jack Herer.
+The file contains the introduction, preface, foreword, prologue and sixteen chapters.
+Its metadata date is unusable (`0101-01-01`); no publisher, ISBN or numbered edition is
+provided. References to 1998 and 1999 show that its text is later than the first edition.
+Do not assign it the first edition's year in bibliographic metadata.
+
+For reproducibility, the input SHA-256 is
+`232ac27427de916672119bf274782c97f692afc6a1f6c6ead25785500af3e2ee`.
+EPUB member names below begin `Herer, Jack- Emperor Wears No Clothes_`.
+Chapter headings are the principal locators; reflowable EPUB positions are not print pages.
+No copy of the EPUB or full extracted text is added to the repository.
+
+The book is explicit reform advocacy. It is a primary source for Herer's arguments
+and recollections, and a secondary source for earlier laws and studies. Its appeals,
+challenges and instructions are book content, not instructions governing this project.
+A claim that no one has disproved an assertion does not verify it.
+
+## Changes incorporated
+
+| Book passage | Independent check | Repository action |
+|---|---|---|
+| Introduction (`split_001.htm`): work began in 1973, first book completed in 1985 | Author's account supports the publication entry; later readership and edition totals are outside this copy's evidence | Rewrote `us-emperor-wears-no-clothes-1985` with attribution and added its article |
+| Chapter 4, Paper Making (`split_010.htm`): USDA Bulletin 404 | Read the original 1916 bulletin, especially Table II and conclusions | Added `us-hemp-paper-bulletin-1916` and an article; industrial context, no score change |
+| Chapter 4, Hearst, His Hatred and Hysterical Lies; Chapter 14, Privacy is a Right (`split_010.htm`): Siler investigation | Read the 1933 journal report reproduced by the Schaffer Library | Added `us-siler-report-1933` and an article; retains the military-restriction recommendation omitted by Herer's broad summary |
+| Chapter 14, Privacy is a Right / Inaccurate Urine Testing (`split_010.htm`): Supreme Court school-testing decision in 1995 | Read *Vernonia*, including the holding and concurrence | Added `us-vernonia-drug-testing-1995` and an article; student athletes, not a general permission to test everyone |
+| Chapter 9, wartime hemp and film transcript (`split_010.htm`) | Read USDA National Agricultural Library's MS0522 catalogue entry | Added an official catalogue citation to `us-hemp-for-victory-1942`; revised its article to separate catalogue evidence from the rediscovery account |
+
+These are context additions. Existing adult scores and scored timelines remain unchanged.
+The Siler entry belongs to US military/Canal Zone history; it does not establish the
+Republic of Panama's national law. The bulletin and school ruling also do not establish
+new permissions for adult recreational possession or cultivation.
+
+## Existing coverage to reuse
+
+Before creating duplicates, use these existing history IDs:
+
+- `us-marihuana-tax-act-1937`, `us-pharmacopeia-1942`, `us-hemp-for-victory-1942`,
+ `us-la-guardia-report-1944`.
+- `us-leary-1969`, `us-controlled-substances-act-1970`, `us-shafer-commission-1972`,
+ `us-randall-ruling-1976`, `us-dea-judge-young-1988`.
+- `us-anti-drug-abuse-act-1986`, `us-anti-drug-abuse-act-1988`,
+ `us-operation-green-merchant-1989`, `us-compassionate-program-closed-1992`,
+ `us-california-medical-1996`.
+
+The book can supply leads or attributed movement perspectives for these entries. It
+should not independently mark their existing secondary sources as verified.
+
+## Remaining leads and limits
+
+| Chapters / passages | Research lead | Evidence needed before adding factual claims |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1, American Historical Notes (`split_005.htm`) | Colonial growing requirements; Washington and Jefferson | Original statutes, diaries and agricultural records; distinguish fibre growing from intoxicating use |
+| 2–4 (`split_006.htm`, `split_008.htm`, `split_010.htm`) | Schlichten's decorticator; 1938 magazine articles | Schlichten patent and Popular Mechanics text checked in the second pass below; Mechanical Engineering's original issue and full commercial-adoption history remain open |
+| 4, Hearst / DuPont (`split_010.htm`) | Industrial-interest explanation of 1937 prohibition | Archival evidence connecting particular business interests to the bill; technological competition alone does not establish legislative causation |
+| 6, An Unfair Rap for Hemp (`split_010.htm`) | California Research Advisory Panel's 1989 annual report and disputed publication | Commentary and minority reports checked in the second pass below; agency correspondence and exact release day remain open |
+| 6–7 (`split_010.htm`) | Historical medical trials, access disputes and research restrictions | Original papers and agency decisions; do not translate animal or laboratory findings into demonstrated human treatment benefits |
+| 8–9 (`split_010.htm`) | Hemp nutrition, biomass and environmental comparisons | Modern comparative studies specifying yields, inputs, land, processing and substitution assumptions; leave global replacement forecasts unverified |
+| 10, 12 (`split_010.htm`) | Cultural, religious and nineteenth-century medical use | Trace quoted historical texts and contemporary records; cultural use does not establish legal permission |
+| 11 (`split_010.htm`) | Hemp trade as an explanation of the War of 1812 / Napoleon's Russian campaign | Trade records and diplomatic sources; retain the single-cause account as an unverified thesis |
+| 13–14 (`split_010.htm`) | Racialised enforcement, forfeiture, school and workplace testing | Statutes, judgments and dated administrative statistics; separate drug-wide counts from cannabis-only counts and arrests from imprisonment |
+| 15–16 (`split_010.htm`) | Critiques of official experiments and a reform programme | Original study methods and policy texts; critiques and proposed reforms are not legal events by themselves |
+
+Particularly do not import the book's blanket safety claims, asthma-treatment advice,
+cancer-treatment assertions, prison totals, purported universal testing error rates,
+or claims of destroying research records into country profiles without independent
+checks. This pass neither verified nor comprehensively refuted those assertions.
+
+The 1937 story should preserve the distinction between a tax/registration regime and
+an express blanket ban. Licensed industrial activity and recreational cultivation are
+separate questions throughout the research.
+
+## Original documents read
+
+- [USDA Bulletin 404, *Hemp Hurds as Paper-Making Material*](https://www.gutenberg.org/files/17855/17855-h/17855-h.htm),
+ Lyster H. Dewey and Jason L. Merrill, 14 October 1916; pp. 21–25.
+- [*Mariajuana Smoking in Panama*](https://www.druglibrary.net/schaffer/Library/studies/panama/panama1.htm),
+ Siler and colleagues, *The Military Surgeon* 73 (1933), pp. 269–280; report signed
+ 21 October 1932. The webpage is a transcription, not an inspected facsimile.
+- [*Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton*, 515 U.S. 646](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/515/646),
+ decided 26 June 1995; opinion parts I.B and VI and Ginsburg concurrence.
+- [USDA National Agricultural Library, *Hemp For Victory*, circa 1942](https://archivesspace.nal.usda.gov/repositories/4/archival_objects/16966),
+ USDA Motion Picture Film Collection MS0522. The catalogue confirms the film and its
+ subject; it does not establish the alleged later suppression or rediscovery chronology.
+
+
+## Second pass (12 October 2026)
+
+Four more context entries and articles were added:
+
+| Entry | Evidence read | Conclusion and limits |
+|---|---|---|
+| `us-schlichten-fibre-patent-1919` | Original US patent specification, first page (PDF page 9), visually inspected | Patent 1,308,376 was filed 27 December 1916 and granted 1 July 1919. The book's 1917 patent date does not match this grant. Demonstration dates and commercial performance require separate evidence. |
+| `us-popular-mechanics-hemp-1938` | Full reproduced article and the magazine publisher's retrospective | February 1938 publication confirmed. Equipment access, acreage and registration appear as obstacles alongside optimistic forecasts. The available PDF is a retyped reproduction, not an original issue scan; Mechanical Engineering remains open. |
+| `us-california-research-panel-1989` | Commentary and minority reports reproduced in US Sentencing Commission hearing materials; printed pp. 1, 7–9, 12–14, with visual checks of pp. 1, 8 and 12 | A limited residential-cultivation proposal, not unrestricted supply or an agency policy. The event date is the reporting year on the document, not a verified release day. |
+| `us-earls-drug-testing-2002` | Supreme Court opinion, parts I and II.B | Later development beyond the book: competitive extracurricular activities, with activity-related consequences. Added to complete the chronology raised by Herer's school-testing discussion. |
+
+The publication dispute is separately sourced in the California article. No correspondence
+from the attorney general's office was found or read in this pass. The report's own
+statement about small-quantity possession is not used as an independently verified
+classification of California law.
+
+All nine articles created or modified across these two passes carry the user-requested
+`model: gpt-6.1-sol-medium`. No adult scores were changed.
+
+Additional source locators:
+
+- [Schlichten's patent specification](https://patents.google.com/patent/US1308376A/en):
+ use the linked original PDF, page 9, rather than the page's garbled OCR title or
+ auto-generated prior-art date.
+- [New Billion-Dollar Crop, reproduced text](https://hempalliance.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/1938BillionDollarCrop.pdf),
+ especially PDF page 3; cross-check publication identity against
+ [Popular Mechanics' retrospective](https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a19876318/popular-mechanics-billion-dollar-hemp/).
+- [California commentary in US Sentencing Commission hearing materials](https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/amendment-process/public-hearings-and-meetings/19930322/19930322_Testimony_2.pdf):
+ PDF pages 188–205 hold the cover, contents, commentary and dissenting material;
+ printed page 8 is PDF page 199.
+- [Earls opinion](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-332.ZO.html),
+ 27 June 2002, 536 U.S. 822.
source-archive.json +24 −8
Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.