The story · written by gpt-6,
Mali’s drug law signed on 1 September 1983 exposed illicit drug users to five to ten years of forced labour, a fine, or both. Illegal narcotic production, manufacture, import or export could bring forced labour for life and a large fine.
The government controlled the drug lists
President Moussa Traoré signed the law after parliament adopted it. It prohibited cultivation, production, possession, purchase and supply of controlled substances, while allowing the health minister to grant special permission for treatment or medical and scientific research.
The law left the lists of poisonous substances and narcotics to government decrees. A decree in July 1988 expressly included cannabis and cannabis resin among the narcotics controlled under it. The distinction mattered because the legislation attached different punishments to narcotics and to other poisonous substances.
Mali had already joined the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. The national law combined control over legitimate uses with criminal penalties for unauthorised activity.
Using drugs could mean years of forced labour
Illicit use carried five to ten years of forced labour and a fine of 200,000 to two million francs, with either punishment also available alone. The offence covered the substances and plants controlled under the law.
Helping someone else use narcotics, including by providing premises free of charge, also attracted heavy penalties. Property holders who knowingly allowed land, buildings or vehicles to be used for prohibited activities faced punishment. Courts could close hotels, bars and other public premises where operators committed or tolerated offences.
Treatment came under judicial control
A person accused of attempted illicit narcotic use could be ordered into detoxification after a medical assessment. The court could then withhold punishment. Refusing treatment exposed the person to the penalties for illicit use.
Treatment could take place in a specialist institution or under medical supervision, with doctors reporting to the judicial authorities. The law provided for state funding, partly from fines collected for drug offences.
Police and other authorised officials could search drug manufacturing, processing and storage premises at any hour. Confiscation and destruction of seized substances accompanied the criminal response, with medical authorities allowed to retain samples for research.
A lighter personal-use tier came in 2001
The 2001 replacement law expressly repealed the 1983 law. It gave small quantities possessed, bought or grown for personal consumption their own penalty tiers, including a fine-only option and prison ranges measured in months.
That change separated personal supplies from the long forced-labour punishments in the earlier law. It became a major change in how Mali’s legislation treated people holding or growing drugs for themselves.[1][2][3]
Score by segment 0 to 10
- Possession · 25%2 → 1−1
- Personal cultivation · 25%1 → 0−1
- Punishment & enforcement · 20%2 → 0−2
- Sharing & gifting · 10%1 → 1
- Consumption · 10%1 → 1
- Legal access · 10%0 → 0
The bar shows the score after the change; the tick marks where it stood before. Mali's scores have changed again since.
References
- Mali — Law 83-14 of 1 September 1983, text held by UNODCComplete law, especially Articles 1–10, 13 and 16–18archived
- Mali — Decree 199/PG-RM of 12 July 1988, reproduced legal textArticle 1, cannabis and resin; signaturearchived
- Mali — Law 01-078 of 18 July 2001, original official gazetteArticles 138 and 144, printed pp. 1138–1139archived
Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read. The score before the change is an editorial estimate.