Cannabis Freedom Index

Exhibition 001 · Propaganda

Reefer Madness

The invention of a monster

The original trailer, as shared by the Coolidge Corner Theatre. The film is in the public domain.
Read the programme

The programme

What this was

Reefer Madness is an American film made in 1936 as Tell Your Children. A school principal warns parents about marijuana, and the story shows young people who try it sliding into a hit-and-run, a killing, suicide and the asylum. It was made outside the Hollywood studios and toured cheap cinemas under several titles for years.

The film is the best-known piece of a much larger campaign. Through the 1930s American newspapers, and the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger, described cannabis, under the Mexican name marihuana, as a new drug that drove young people to madness and murder. Few of the stories were checked. In 1937 Congress passed the Marihuana Tax Act after short hearings, and legal cannabis, prescriptions included, became practically impossible to get anywhere in the United States; doctors lost it as a medicine five years later.

The picture lasted far longer than the film. It shaped the penalties of the 1950s, travelled to the League of Nations and the United Nations, and still turns up whenever cannabis is debated. Historians call episodes like this a moral panic.

What you will find here

This exhibition takes the claims seriously enough to check them. Each room looks at one part of the story, and every statement links to a source, marked as primary evidence, a documented connection or an interpretation. You can walk through in order or jump to any room.

  1. Room IThe ClaimsTen claims of the era, each checked against what later research found.
  2. Room IIThe MachineryWho spread the story, and how the press, the bureau, Congress and the film fed one another.
  3. Room IIIThe CycleThe other drug films of the time, and why they were all made outside Hollywood.
  4. Room IVThe GalleryPosters and paperback covers that sold the panic, and the tricks they used.
  5. Room VThe DefendantsReal people sentenced under the new laws, and how long the sentences grew.
  6. Room VIThe ExportHow the same picture of the drug reached international law, and who argued against it.
  7. Room VIIThe AfterlifeHow the film became a joke, and its title the name for any drug scare.
  8. Room VIIIThe Evidence RoomEvery document behind the exhibition, labelled for what kind of evidence it is.

Room I

The Daily Panic

Newspapers were the campaign's loudest voice. In the 1930s many American papers printed stories of crimes blamed on marijuana, usually without checking them, and officials quoted the papers back to Congress. Here are ten claims of the kind America read then. Open one: behind each is a case file with who made the claim, where it circulated, what was offered as evidence, what later research found, and a verdict.

Case file · murder

WEED OF MADNESS DRIVES YOUTH TO AXE MURDER

VerdictContradicted

Who said it
Harry J. Anslinger, commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, in the 1937 hearings and in “Marijuana, Assassin of Youth”.
Where it circulated
Newspapers, The American Magazine (July 1937), testimony to Congress.
Evidence offered
Anecdotes. Chief among them Victor Licata, who killed his family with an axe in Ybor City, Tampa, in October 1933, presented as a sane young man undone by marijuana.
What later research found
Licata had been diagnosed with dementia praecox, an old name for schizophrenia; marijuana appears nowhere in his psychiatric reports and was not considered a factor in the killings. The LaGuardia committee in 1944 found marijuana was not a cause of serious crime in New York.

Case file · madness

ONE CIGARETTE: INSANITY

VerdictUnsupported

Who said it
The film Tell Your Children (1936–38), later Reefer Madness; Mexican and American newspapers before it.
Where it circulated
Cinemas and exploitation circuits; the American press from the 1890s.
Evidence offered
A melodrama: a principal tells parents the story of young people driven by a few cigarettes to hit-and-run, murder and an asylum.
What later research found
In 1951 Harris Isbell, research director of the federal hospital at Lexington, told Congress that marijuana smokers were usually mildly intoxicated, bothered no one and developed no dependence. A dramatic plot is not evidence that its sequence of events follows from using cannabis.

Case file · foreign

DANGEROUS MEXICAN WEED

VerdictPrejudice, not evidence

Who said it
American newspapers, from the 1890s; the city of El Paso in 1915.
Where it circulated
Local and regional papers digitised in the Library of Congress's Chronicling America; city councils in the Southwest.
Evidence offered
Stories of people running amok after smoking, framed around Mexican migrants; El Paso's ordinance drew on Mexican beliefs that the drug caused madness and violence.
What later research found
The Library of Congress itself describes this coverage as tied to anti-Mexican propaganda and warns that many of the articles contain slurs. The claim tells us about prejudice more than about the plant.

Case file · gateway

FIRST REEFER, THEN HEROIN

VerdictContradicted, and once rejected by its own author

Who said it
Harry J. Anslinger, from 1951.
Where it circulated
Congressional hearings; the case for punishing marijuana like heroin.
Evidence offered
Anslinger's claim that over half of young heroin addicts had started on marijuana.
What later research found
In 1937 Anslinger himself had rejected the stepping-stone claim. The LaGuardia committee found in 1944 that marijuana did not lead to morphine, heroin or cocaine addiction.

Case file · menace

ASSASSIN OF YOUTH STALKS THE SCHOOLS

VerdictContradicted

Who said it
The film's frame story; Anslinger's 1937 article and its illustrations of young people.
Where it circulated
Cinemas, The American Magazine, newspapers.
Evidence offered
Stories of schoolchildren lured by dealers, without figures for how many young people used the drug.
What later research found
The LaGuardia committee found marijuana was not widely used by schoolchildren and was not tied to juvenile delinquency in New York. In April 1938 Anslinger told his New York supervisor that press reports had become almost hysterical and that the bureau would discourage undue emphasis on the drug.

Case file · research

FACTS, NOT FICTION, SAYS FILM

VerdictNo evidence offered

Who said it
The film's own foreword.
Where it circulated
The opening of every print.
Evidence offered
A foreword assuring the audience that its scenes rest on research into marijuana addiction.
What later research found
The film names no study. Its claim to research is part of its rhetoric: it borrows the authority of science for an invented plot.

Case file · doctors

DOCTORS BACK THE BAN

VerdictFalse

Who said it
A member of the Ways and Means Committee, answering a question on the House floor in June 1937.
Where it circulated
The short House debate before the bill passed without a recorded vote.
Evidence offered
Asked whether the American Medical Association supported the bill, the member said that it did, naming one of its doctors.
What later research found
The association had sent its legislative counsel, Dr William C. Woodward, to the committee hearings in May to oppose the bill. He said no evidence had been produced from prisons or from the Children's Bureau to back the bureau's claims, and that a prohibitive tax would shut out medical uses still worth study.

Case file · new

A NEW DRUG MENACE

VerdictAn old medicine, and evidence ignored

Who said it
The Federal Bureau of Narcotics and the press, through the 1930s.
Where it circulated
Newspapers, magazines and the 1937 hearings, where marihuana was presented as something strange and recent.
Evidence offered
The unfamiliar name: marihuana, a Mexican word, rather than the cannabis and hemp Americans already knew.
What later research found
Cannabis extracts had been listed in the US Pharmacopeia as a medicine since 1850 and stayed there until 1942. In 1894 the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission had heard nearly 1,200 witnesses and concluded that moderate use did practically no harm; the American campaign did not engage with it.

Case file · soldiers

WEED MENACES OUR SOLDIERS

VerdictContradicted by the army's own inquiry

Who said it
Military authorities and courts in the Panama Canal Zone, in the 1920s.
Where it circulated
Court cases and orders in the Zone, which banned possession in 1923.
Evidence offered
Arrests of soldiers and sailors, and the fear that the drug would ruin discipline.
What later research found
A Canal Zone committee studied the drug in 1926 and found only minor effects. A second army committee, reporting in The Military Surgeon in 1933 after observing 34 soldiers, recommended no further legislation against sale or use in the Zone.

Case file · narcotic

REEFER IS A NARCOTIC, LIKE OPIUM

VerdictA legal label, not a finding

Who said it
The Uniform State Narcotic Drug Act, adopted in 1932, and the states that added cannabis to it.
Where it circulated
State legislatures, campaigned for by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics with the Hearst newspapers.
Evidence offered
A definition. A state could put cannabis under the narcotics law simply by adding it to the list of narcotic drugs.
What later research found
The word put cannabis beside opium and morphine in law, with their penalties, but cannabis is not an opiate. The LaGuardia committee found in 1944 that marijuana did not cause addiction in the medical sense of the word.

Room II

The Machinery

A moral panic is rarely one person's work. Here the press, one federal official, a single murder case, a magazine article, a bill and a film fed each other: the papers gave Anslinger his stories, he gave Congress his file of cases, and the film arrived as the law took effect. Read it from the top: each step is dated, coloured by who acted, and joined to the next by what the record shows happened. Stories that are often told but not documented are set apart in their own panel.

  1. The press

    Border newspapers

    American papers print stories of a Mexican weed that makes men run amok, many of them openly racist.

    History →
    Newspaper headline: Is the Mexican nation locoed by a peculiar weed?
    A US newspaper, 25 September 1915Library of Congress, Chronicling America
  2. Lawmakers

    El Paso bans the drug

    The first American ban to draw on the belief that marijuana causes madness and violence. Western states follow over the next twenty years.

    History →
  3. The bureau

    The Federal Bureau of Narcotics

    Harry J. Anslinger becomes its first commissioner. From 1931 he tells the press that criminals use the drug for courage, and from 1934 he treats it as a serious threat.

    History →
    The first badge of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics
    The bureau's first badge, 1930Wikimedia Commons, public domain
  4. The press

    The Licata case

    In Tampa, Victor Licata kills his family with an axe. A Florida official's letter brings the story to Anslinger; marijuana is not in Licata's psychiatric record.

    History →
    Poster: Beware! It contains the killer drug marihuana, in which lurks murder, insanity, death
    “Murder! Insanity! Death!”: a 1930s poster of the Inter-State Narcotic Association, ChicagoWikimedia Commons, public domain
  5. Lawmakers

    The Treasury's bill

    H.R. 6385, drafted by the Treasury's general counsel Herman Oliphant, taxes every sale so heavily that legal supply becomes impractical.

    History →
    Two men in suits talking in an office
    Herman Oliphant (left), the Treasury's general counsel, in 1937Harris & Ewing, Library of Congress
  6. Lawmakers

    The hearings

    Anslinger's evidence is largely newspaper clippings and anecdotes. The American Medical Association's counsel, William Woodward, is the only witness against the bill.

    History →
    Harry Anslinger looking down at papers
    Harry J. Anslinger in Washington, March 1938Library of Congress
  7. Page and screen

    “Marijuana, Assassin of Youth”

    Anslinger's article in The American Magazine, with Licata as its centrepiece, reaches millions of readers.

    History →
    The American Magazine page of Marijuana, Assassin of Youth
    The American Magazine, July 1937
  8. Lawmakers

    The Marihuana Tax Act

    Federal law takes effect. The first arrests come within days.

    History →
    A one-dollar Marihuana Tax Act revenue stamp
    A one-dollar marihuana tax stamp, 1937
  9. Page and screen

    Tell Your Children, later Reefer Madness

    A melodrama of ruined youth, reissued by the exploitation producer Dwain Esper. It spread the fear further, but it came too late to make the law.

    History →
    Reefer Madness poster
    A Reefer Madness poster

Room III

The Cycle

Reefer Madness was not alone. The Hollywood studios' Production Code, enforced from 1934, barred showing the drug trade, so the drug film belonged to independents who took their prints from town to town and sold the forbidden as a warning. Six of them survive in the public domain. Here is the bill: every one of them can be run in this theatre.

Adults onlyRoadshow attractionsOne week only

Six Shocking Features

The drug films of the exploitation circuit, 1934 to 1949 · now at this theatre

  1. Poster for The Road to Ruin

    193464 minutes

    The Road to Ruin

    “Modern youth burned at the altar of ignorance”

    Dorothy Davenport and Melville Shyer

    A schoolgirl drawn into drink, marijuana and sex, co-directed by Dorothy Davenport under the name Mrs. Wallace Reid. It was billed for adults only, and censors in Virginia demanded a record number of cuts.

    History →Source ↗Internet Archive ↗

  2. Poster for Marihuana

    193657 minutes

    Marihuana

    “Weed with roots in hell”

    Dwain Esper, written by Hildagarde Stadie

    A young woman's slide from a beach party to the drug trade, from a script by Esper's wife.

    History →Source ↗Internet Archive ↗

  3. Poster for Tell Your Children, later Reefer Madness

    1936–3868 minutes

    Tell Your Children, later Reefer Madness

    “Women cry for it, men die for it”

    Louis Gasnier, for George Hirliman

    A school principal warns parents with the story of teenagers led to murder, suicide and madness. Esper bought it and reissued it under the title that stuck.

    History →Source ↗Internet Archive ↗

  4. Poster for Assassin of Youth

    1937feature

    Assassin of Youth

    “A puff, a party, a tragedy”

    Elmer Clifton

    A reporter goes undercover among teenage marijuana smokers, where a girl is being framed by relatives after her inheritance. It shares its title with Anslinger's magazine article of the same year.

    History →Internet Archive ↗

  5. Poster for Devil's Harvest

    194252 minutes

    Devil's Harvest

    “Marijuana, the smoke of hell”

    Ray Test, for Continental Pictures

    Gangsters sell marijuana to students from a hot-dog stand near a school. Made in wartime, its poster called the drug a fifth column.

    History →Source ↗Internet Archive ↗

  6. Poster for She Shoulda Said No!

    194969 minutes

    She Shoulda Said No!

    “Lila Leeds' own story”

    Sam Newfield, as Sherman Scott

    Made to cash in on the 1948 arrest of Robert Mitchum and Lila Leeds, starring Leeds herself as a showgirl ruined by marijuana. The showman Kroger Babb reissued it as The Devil's Weed and Wild Weed.

    History →Source ↗Internet Archive ↗

Now showing

Public domain, played from the Internet Archive.

  1. Admit one · note 1Outside the studios

    The Production Code, enforced from 1934, kept the drug trade off Hollywood's screens. The subject went to small independents with no stars and tiny budgets.

  2. Admit one · note 2A lesson, on paper

    A written foreword, or a lecturer on stage, presented the film as education for parents. It was the excuse that let a sensational subject past local censors.

  3. Admit one · note 3From town to town

    Prints travelled with their own showmen, who rented a cinema for a few days, advertised hard, and moved on before word of mouth caught up.

The films are in the public domain and play from the Internet Archive only when you run them. On roadshows: Eric Schaefer — “Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!”: A History of Exploitation Films, 1919–1959 (1999). The Production Code: Britannica — Motion Picture Production Code, and its drug rule in our history.

Room V

The Defendants

The films were fiction; the sentences were not. A docket of people the law caught, and of what the law came to demand, with each sentence drawn to scale on the bars: every step to the right is ten times longer.

  1. No. 1937-001Samuel CaldwellDenver, Colorado

    Arrested on 2 October 1937, the day after the Marihuana Tax Act took effect, while selling cannabis.

    4 years in Leavenworth and a $1,000 fine

    History →Source ↗
  2. No. 1937-002Moses BacaDenver, Colorado

    Arrested with Caldwell, as the buyer.

    18 months for possession

    History →Source ↗
  3. No. 1937–40The unnamedAcross the United States

    In the act's first three months agents made 369 seizures. In about half of the cases of the next few years the person held less than an ounce and no sale was alleged.

    Sentences not recorded here

    History →Richard Bonnie and Charles Whitebread — The Marijuana Conviction (1974)
  4. No. 1940Mezz MezzrowNew York

    Jazz's best-known marijuana seller, arrested with sixty joints at the entrance to a club at the World's Fair. In jail he insisted he was Black and was moved to the segregated Black section.

    Jailed for intent to sell

    History →Source ↗
  5. No. 1943Gene KrupaSan Francisco, California

    The swing era's star drummer, convicted of using his teenage valet to carry marijuana on a charge now described as falsified. He served six months, and the case broke up his orchestra.

    1 to 6 years at San Quentin; served six months

    History →Source ↗
  6. No. 1947Anita O'DayNorth Hollywood, California

    The jazz singer and her husband, convicted after police found marijuana and rolling papers at their home.

    90 days in jail

    History →
  7. No. 1949-001Robert MitchumLos Angeles, California

    Arrested in 1948 at Lila Leeds's house; pleaded guilty to conspiracy. The arrest helped forge his legend.

    60 days in jail

    History →Source ↗
  8. No. 1949-002Lila LeedsLos Angeles, California

    Arrested with Mitchum. Her career did not survive it; she was cast as a ruined showgirl in She Shoulda Said No!

    60 days and five years' probation

    History →Source ↗
  9. No. 1951Any first offenderFederal law, the Boggs Act

    One scale of penalties for marijuana and narcotics, with mandatory minimums.

    2 to 5 years for a first offence

    History →Source ↗
  10. No. 1956Any sellerLouisiana

    A little Boggs act: selling, possessing or administering a narcotic drug, marijuana included.

    5 to 99 years, without parole, probation or suspension

    History →
  11. No. 1968Lee Otis JohnsonHouston, Texas

    A civil-rights organiser who handed one joint to an undercover officer. Texas counted it as a sale. Freed in 1972, when a federal judge ruled he should not have been tried in Houston.

    30 years in prison

    History →

In 1954 the federal judges of the Fifth Circuit unanimously asked Congress to remove the mandatory minimums; Anslinger denounced them (history). In 1969 the Supreme Court struck the Marihuana Tax Act down (history).

Room VI

The Export

The monster travelled. Cannabis entered international law at Geneva on another country's say-so, and the American case was argued at the League of Nations. The most direct contradictions came from Cairo and Mexico City. Read the wires.

  1. Telegram1924-12From Geneva

    Mohamed El Guindy, Egypt

    HASHISH AS DANGEROUS AS OPIUM AND A MAJOR CAUSE OF INSANITY STOP ASKS THE SAME CONTROLS STOP NO FORMAL EVIDENCE PRODUCED STOP

  2. Telegram1925-02From Geneva

    The Second Opium Conference

    INDIAN HEMP ADDED TO THE INTERNATIONAL OPIUM CONVENTION STOP EXPORT AND IMPORT FOR MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC USE ONLY STOP FIRST TREATY TO COVER CANNABIS STOP

  3. Telegram1930From Cairo

    Russell Pasha, Cairo police

    HASHISH THE VICE OF THE CITY SLUMS STOP DOES COMPARATIVELY LITTLE HARM STOP VILLAGE SMOKERS REGARDED AS A JOKE STOP

  4. Telegram1938-06From Geneva

    Harry J. Anslinger, United States

    MARIJUANA KEEPS ITS TRADITION OF MURDER, ASSAULT, RAPE AND MENTAL DETERIORATION STOP

  5. Telegram1938-06From Geneva

    Russell Pasha, Egypt, in reply

    HASHISH ADDICTION LEADS TO NO PARTICULAR CRIME WAVE STOP THE ADDICT IS A TIRESOME INDIVIDUAL, NOT A DANGEROUS CRIMINAL STOP

  6. Telegram1938-10From Mexico City

    Dr Leopoldo Salazar Viniegra

    NOT ONE CASE OF PSYCHOSIS IN TEN YEARS DEFINITELY CAUSED BY MARIJUANA STOP CALLS THE MADNESS A MYTH STOP THE PRESS CALLS HIM MAD STOP

  7. Telegram1940-07From Mexico City

    Government of Mexico

    HEALTH-BASED DRUG REGULATION SUSPENDED AFTER FIVE MONTHS, UNDER PRESSURE FROM THE UNITED STATES STOP

The League's 1938 exchange, by the account in Squaring a Circle: Cannabis and the Dubious Legacy of the League of Nations; Salazar Viniegra and Mexico in 1940, by Isaac Campos.

Room VII

The Afterlife

A warning becomes a joke, and then a word. The film failed as a warning, but its title did not: once students had laughed at it, “reefer madness” became the name for any drug scare built on fear rather than evidence, and it is used more today than when the film was new.

The phrase that outlived the filmHow often “reefer madness” appears in English books, per billion words
0102019601970198019902000201020201972 · A print for $2971998 · A musical2003 · The title, borrowed2005 · On television

Point at a year. Before 1971 the phrase barely appears; the year Stroup began showing the film, it jumps.

Data: Google Books Ngram Viewer — “reefer madness”, English, 1960–2022, read in October 2026. Books only, and only those Google has scanned.

  1. 1972A print for $297

    Keith Stroup, founder of the reform group NORML, finds a print in the Library of Congress, learns the film is in the public domain and buys a copy.

    History →Keith Stroup →Source ↗
  2. 1970sCampus fundraisers

    Stroup screens it after his lectures to raise money for reform. Students who were meant to be frightened laugh.

    History →Source ↗
  3. 1970sA midnight movie

    It joins the late-night cult circuit, and its overacting makes it a classic of camp. Leonard Maltin calls it the granddaddy of all worst movies.

    Source ↗
  4. 1992On stage in Chicago

    Sean Abley's stage adaptation opens, the first of several.

    Source ↗
  5. 1998A musical

    Kevin Murphy and Dan Studney's musical turns the warnings into show tunes.

    History →Source ↗
  6. 2003The title, borrowed

    Eric Schlosser calls his book on America's black markets Reefer Madness. Its marijuana chapter follows Mark Young, given life without parole for a minor role in a marijuana deal.

    History →Source ↗
  7. 2004In colour

    A colourised DVD, with a mocking commentary by Mike Nelson of Mystery Science Theater 3000. The joke is now the product.

    Source ↗
  8. 2005On television

    The musical becomes a television film for Showtime, with Alan Cumming and Kristen Bell.

    History →Source ↗
  9. TodayFree to all

    Never protected by copyright, it can be watched, copied and remixed by anyone. Its title is now shorthand for any exaggerated drug scare.

    Source ↗

Scroll the strip: the film's later life, frame by frame.

Room VIII

The Evidence Room

Nothing disappears behind the story. Here is every document, connection and reading the exhibition rests on. Primary evidence is a document from the time itself, such as a film, a speech or a report. A documented connection is something historians have shown from the record. An interpretation is a reading or a popular story, some of them repeated far more often than they are proven. Filter by kind.

1890s–1915Newspaper

Sensational marihuana stories in American papers

Many tied to anti-Mexican propaganda; the Library of Congress lists them with a warning.

Primary evidence

1915Law

El Paso bans marijuana

The first US measure built on the madness-and-violence belief.

Documented connection

1930Institution

The Federal Bureau of Narcotics is founded

Harry J. Anslinger is its first commissioner.

Documented connection

1931Press statement

Anslinger links marijuana to crime

His first public endorsement of the crime claim, by Bonnie and Whitebread's account.

Primary evidence

1933Case

Victor Licata kills his family

Diagnosed with dementia praecox; marijuana absent from his psychiatric reports.

Documented connection

1937Bill

H.R. 6385 is introduced

Prepared by the Treasury's general counsel, Herman Oliphant.

Primary evidence

1937Testimony

William Woodward opposes the bill

The American Medical Association's counsel says the evidence is newspaper stories.

Primary evidence

1937Law

The Marihuana Tax Act

Federal tax and registration that made legal supply impractical.

Documented connection

1937Court

The first sentences under the act

A Denver court, within days of the act.

Documented connection

1937Memo

Stop filling the courts with petty cases

Anslinger's confidential memo to his agents.

Primary evidence

1938Memo

The bureau plays marijuana down

Press reports almost hysterical, Anslinger writes.

Primary evidence

1938Debate

Egypt's police chief contradicts Anslinger

At the League of Nations: the addict is tiresome, not a dangerous criminal.

Primary evidence

1944Report

The LaGuardia report

No link to addiction, serious crime or harder drugs in New York.

Documented connection

1951Testimony

Harris Isbell to Congress

Smokers mildly intoxicated, no dependence; violence unproven.

Primary evidence

1972Report

The Shafer Commission

Recommends removing criminal penalties for possession.

Documented connection

1924Speech

Egypt asks Geneva to control hashish

As dangerous as opium, the delegate says; no evidence is produced.

Primary evidence

1930Report

Russell Pasha: hashish does little harm

Cairo's police chief to the League of Nations.

Primary evidence

1934–68Rule

The Production Code bars drug trafficking on screen

The studios' own censorship; drug films were made and shown outside it.

Documented connection

1938Paper

Salazar Viniegra: the myth of marijuana

A Mexican psychiatrist to the Academy of Medicine.

Primary evidence

1940Diplomacy

Mexico suspends its health-based drug rule

Under American pressure, after five months.

Documented connection

1951Law

The Boggs Act

Mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana and narcotics alike.

Documented connection

1954Resolution

Judges ask Congress to end mandatory minimums

The Fifth Circuit, unanimously; Anslinger denounces them.

Primary evidence

1969Court

Leary v. United States

The Supreme Court strikes the Marihuana Tax Act down.

Documented connection

—Claim

Hearst fought cannabis to save his paper business

A popular story with no document behind it in the sources here.

Interpretation

—Claim

A church group paid for the film

Often repeated, unconfirmed.

Interpretation

—Reading

The film did not make the law

The film reached screens around and after the act; the act has its own documentary history.

Interpretation

Collections worth a visit: the Hash Marihuana & Hemp Museum, Stanford's research collection and the Library of Congress guide. The poster is in the public domain (Motion Picture Ventures, via Wikimedia Commons); the magazine page is from the Hash Marihuana & Hemp Museum's collection.

← Back to the exhibitions The United States' history →

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.