Cannabis Freedom Index

Changelog 1a44b8d

charts

50 history entries added22 history entries edited1 history entry removed1 score changed8 country profiles edited26 articles written4 articles edited8 datasets updated24 files of code, design or docs +8,738 −762 lines

Score changes 1 place

  1. Northern Mariana Islands5355+2sharing 3 → 5

History changes.yaml

Added 50

Edited 22

Northern Mariana Islands’ first cannabis shop opens in Saipan

date

2021-07-1614

title

The Northern Mariana Islands'’ first cannabis dispensaryshop opens in Saipan

description

The first licensed dispensary openedSaipan Select began selling cannabis to the publicadults in Tanapag with a soft opening on 14 July, nearlyfollowed by its grand opening on 16 July. Nearly three years after adult use was legalisedlegalisation, giving adults a legal place tocustomers could buy flower from a licensed shop supplied by its adjoining indoor farm. The commission had granted its first retail licence in May; a separate cannabis lounge followed later that summer.

before

possession 6 · cultivation 5 · enforcement 6 · sharing 35 · consumption 3 · access 0

sources

Marianas Variety — First cannabis store opens doors to Saipan community, 20 July 2021, reporting from the farm and store CNMI governor’s office — First retail licence, 13 May 2021 Wikipedia — Cannabis in the Northern Mariana Islands

Northern Mariana Islands legalise adult use, home growing and gifts

title

The Northern Mariana Islands legalise cannabis by act of the legislatureadult use, home growing and gifts

description

Adults aged 21 and over gained legal possession, home cultivation and capped gifts under a law signed by Governor Ralph Torres signed House Bill 20-178. Households could keep six mature and twelve immature plants and up to eight ounces of usable cannabis, which became Public Law 20-66with a larger plant allowance for medical patients on a doctor’s recommendation. Torres backed a regulated market for health, legalising adultjobs and medical userevenue but vetoed proposed fees and creating a cannabis commission to license businessestax terms, which lawmakers revisited in 2019.

sources

CNMI — Public Law 20-66, approval and item vetoes; sections 106, 112, 170 and commencement Wikipedia — Cannabis in the Northern Mariana Islands CNMI Cannabis Commission — Citizen-Centric Report FY2025 (3 September 2025)

tags

home-growing, thresholds, patients, retail, taxes

Puerto Rico gives its medical cannabis programme a statutory base

tags

patients, retail, youth

title

Puerto Rico putsgives its medical cannabis onprogramme a statutory footingbase

description

Law 42 of 2017 replacedPatients using cannabis within the 2015 executive order withregulated programme gained statutory protection from Puerto Rico criminal and municipal sanctions. The law created a legal framework forregulatory board, required medical cannabisrecommendations and patient identification, with licensed cultivatorsprohibited smoking and public consumption, and kept sales within authorised dispensaries regulated by. It followed the Department of Health2015 executive order and dispensary openings in 2016, with transitional licences for businesses adjusting to the new rules.

before

possession 1 · cultivation 1 · enforcement 2 · sharing 1 · consumption 1 · access 1

sources

Puerto Rico — Medical Cannabis Act 42-2017, articles 5, 8–13, 17 and transitional clause Wikipedia — Cannabis in Puerto Rico Platea — The most treated conditions with medical cannabis in Puerto Rico (18 April 2024)

unscored

The programme was already dispensing cannabis in December 2016. The 2017 law provides a statutory structure and conditions; the existing access gain is dated to actual supply rather than this later enactment.

Puerto Rico’s governor orders a route to medical cannabis

date

2015-05-03

title

Puerto Rico'’s governor allowsorders a route to medical cannabis by executive order

description

Governor Alejandro García Padilla signed an executive order permittingdirected the health secretary to follow the drug law’s procedures, reclassify cannabis components as appropriate and authorise their medical use of cannabis, two years before. The order argued that patients’ health required distinguishing medical from nonmedical use and required a law put the programme on a statutory footingprogress report within three months. Regulations and licensing followed before dispensaries began serving patients in December 2016.

before

possession 1 · cultivation 1 · enforcement 2 · sharing 1 · consumption 1 · access 0

sources

Puerto Rico — Executive Order 2015-010, signed 3 May 2015, operative clauses 1–4 Primera Hora — First dispensaries open, 30 December 2016, reporting governor’s announcement Wikipedia — Cannabis in Puerto Rico

unscored

The order directed administrative action and did not itself open a lawful supply channel. The access step is placed at the documented December 2016 start of dispensary sales.

tags

patients

Congo separates small personal quantities from wider drug trafficking

title

Congo passes a newseparates small personal quantities from wider drug control lawtrafficking

description

Law 30-2025 bans holdingSmall personal possession, using andpurchase or growing controlled plants and sets 1carried one to 12six months for personal use of a cannabis derivative other than oil, and two months to one year for high-risk drug (Article 40), with lighter penalties fordrugs including cannabis oil; a small amount (Article 53) and 2fine alone was possible in either tier. Wider high-risk trafficking carried two to 10ten years for supply (Article 39), a fine, or both. It repeals earlier contrary provisions;President Denis Sassou-N'Guesso signed the law it replaces is not namedafter parliament debated the need to replace an outdated drug-control system.

sources

ACI — Les Sénateurs approuvent la loi sur le contrôle des stupéfiants et des substances psychotropes 1 unchanged

tags

sentencing, home-growing, trafficking, visitors, youth, driving, police-powers

Liberia adds prison minimums for cannabis use and bars trafficking bail

date

2023-0607-12

title

Liberia makes drug supply offences non-bailableadds prison minimums for cannabis use and bars trafficking bail

description

The Liberian Senate and House of Representatives passedPresident George Weah signed a drug law that makes the cultivationsetting four months to one year for first-time Schedule I drug use, manufactureincluding cannabis, importation, export, trafficking and sale of controlled drugs and substancesraising repeat use to a second-degree felony. Cannabis trafficking became non-bailable first; personal possession and cultivation remained separate second-degree felonies with cash bail set at twice the bond. After a dispute over bail in the Senate, the signed law also required deportation of non-Liberians convicted under it and drug clearance for institutional admission or employment.

sources

Liberia — Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2023, sections 14.89–14.91, 14.93 and 14.100–14.102 Executive Mansion — President Weah signs drugs bill into law, 15 July 2023 (signature on 12 July) WADPN — Senate committee debate, 25 July 2022 allAfrica — Liberia: Lawmakers pass non-bailable drug law

tags

sentencing, trafficking, home-growing, treatment, visitors, seeds

unscored

The 2023 Act adds custody minimums, stricter bail and mandatory deportation. The legacy score allocation already represents a highly restrictive regime; practice and the earlier score chain require reconstruction before assigning a further numerical step.

Seychelles allows cannabidiol medicines

tags

patients, cbd, visitors

description

Regulations signed on 28 February 2020 and in forcePatients could apply for approval to obtain prescribed CBD medicines from 1 July let specialists apply to2020, after a specialist assessed their condition and the Public Health Authorityfailure of earlier treatment. The rules followed litigation by Ralph Volcere seeking access for a permit to prescribe cannabidiol-basedhis mother, who had Alzheimer’s disease. They allowed only tightly defined CBD products through authorised pharmacies, with THC no higher than 2% of the cannabidiol. Regulation 19 restates that nobody may grow or smokea 30-day supply limit; smoking and growing cannabis remained forbidden.

sources

Seychelles Constitutional Court — Volcere v Minister for Home Affairs and others, signed judgment, 31 May 2019 Wikipedia — Cannabis in Seychelles 1 unchanged

Seychelles gives judges more discretion over cannabis sentences

date

2016-06-01

title

Seychelles passes a new Misuse of Drugs Actgives judges more discretion over cannabis sentences

description

Parliament unanimouslySeychelles replaced theits 1990 act. Cannabis was placed in Class Bdrug law, allowing courts to sentence cannabis offenders without the old mandatory minimum and letting prisoners apply for a review of their remaining terms. Home Affairs Minister Charles Bastienne promoted the law put more weight onreplacement as a response to rising drug imprisonment and dependence, combining enforcement with treatment and rehabilitation. Later that year, a judge gave a first offender a suspended sentence for users115 grams of cannabis instead of the former 16-year minimum.

sources

Seychelles Official Gazette — Misuse of Drugs Act 2016 (Commencement) Notice, S.I. 34 of 2016 Seychelles Nation — New law to boost fight against drugs, 7 April 2016 Seychelles Supreme Court — R v Ah Kong, signed sentence, 26 October 2016 Seychelles judiciary notice reproduced by Nation — Judiciary puts in place drug sentences review tribunal, 14 June 2016 Wikipedia — Cannabis in Seychelles

tags

sentencing, treatment, amnesty

unscored

The sentencing and review changes are verified, but their historical six-component score effect needs reconstruction alongside the inherited 1882 baseline.

Gambia gives first-time cannabis offenders a lower penalty scale

date

2014-10-09

tags

sentencing, thresholds, youth

title

The Gambia lowers penalties forgives first-time cannabis offenders a lower penalty scale

description

An amendment to the Drug Control Act, applying toFirst-time cannabis possession only, setgained a separate penalty scale: 0.1–150 grams carried a 50,000–100,000-dalasi fine or six months, one to a yeartwo years in prison for a first offence involving up to 150 g, risingor both. The prison ranges rose to two to threefive years above for 151–500 ggrams and three to ten years from 501 grams, each with a fine alternative. Interior Minister Ousman Sonko argued that lighter penalties would reduce the imprisonment of young people unable to pay large fines and ease pressure on prisons.

sources

The Gambia Gazette — Drug Control (Amendment) Act 2014, Act 9, 9 October 2014 Drug Law Enforcement Agency, The Gambia — Drug laws 1 unchanged

Liberia makes personal possession a felony and offers users treatment

date

2014-10-21

category

tighteningother

title

Liberia passes its Controlled Drugmakes personal possession a felony and Substances Actoffers users treatment

description

The Controlled Drug and Substance Act 2014 isPeople holding Schedule I drugs for themselves faced a second-degree felony under the new law that was later amended, withreplacing the West Africa Drug Policy Network'public-health law’s help, in a bill that cuts the sentencemisdemeanor for drug use andunauthorised possession from 5 to 20 years to 3 to 18 months and makes cultivation. Growing for personal use became a lower-grade felony than growing for trafficking. Use was a separate offence, manufacture, transport and trafficking non-bailable with 10 to 20 yearscourts could order treatment, education or rehabilitation instead of conviction or punishment. The law took effect on publication on 21 October 2014.

sources

Liberia — Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2014, repealer, sections 14.107–14.109 and commencement Liberia — Public Health Law, sections 41.22–41.24 IDPC — Liberia: Legislative committee reports to Senate on Controlled Drug and Substance Act 2014 (amended)

tags

sentencing, home-growing, treatment, trafficking, visitors

Gambia raises the minimum trafficking fine tenfold

date

2011-04-29

category

deathtightening

tags

sentencing, trafficking, thresholds

title

The Gambia abolishesraises the death penalty for drug offencesminimum trafficking fine tenfold

description

Gambia raised the general drug-trafficking fine from at least one million to at least ten million dalasi, alongside a prison term of at least ten years. The National Assembly removed capital punishmentquantity rule covered holdings above ten grams of cannabis resin or two kilograms of cannabis, unless the accused proved the possession was not for drug offences while stiffening other penalties;trafficking. The same amendment replaced the maximumseparate death sentence for large amounts of cocaine or heroin becameholdings above 250 grams with life imprisonment.

sources

The Gambia Gazette — Drug Control (Amendment) Act 2011, Act 2, 29 April 2011 The Gambia Gazette — Drug Control (Amendment) Act 2010, Act 16, 29 October 2010 The Gambia — Drug Control Act 2003, consolidated with the 2005 amendments, Issue 1/2009 Library of Congress (Wayback copy) — Gambia: Death penalty for drug offenses abolished 1 unchanged

unscored

The verified cannabis change raises the fine attached to the general trafficking offence; its effect on historical personal-user enforcement scores is not established.

Gambia replaces its drug-control decree with a new law

date

2003-10-03

category

tighteningother

title

The Gambia passesreplaces its Drug Control Actdrug-control decree with a new law

description

The Act isGambia replaced the main1996 drug-control decree with a law on theregulating prohibited and controlled drugs, including cannabis. It prohibited unauthorised growing, supply, use and possession of controlled, while reserving tightly limited medical and prohibited drugsscientific authorisations to approved establishments. Later amendments reorganised the enforcement agency and changed penalties, including a separate first-offender cannabis scale in The Gambia2014.

sources

The Gambia — Drug Control Act 2003, consolidated with the 2005 amendments, Issue 1/2009 The Gambia Gazette — Drug Control (Amendment) Act 2014, Act 9, 9 October 2014 Drug Law Enforcement Agency, The Gambia — Drug laws

tags

sentencing, trafficking

Niger gives small personal supplies and growing a separate penalty

category

tighteningother

title

Niger issues its drug ordinancegives small personal supplies and growing a separate penalty

description

Ordinance 99-42 on combating drugs lists cannabis and cannabis resin in Table ISmall personal possession, the high-risk drugs,purchase and bans growing could be punished with a fine alone under the replacement drug ordinance; its cannabis plant (Article 8). Trafficking in high-risk drugs carries tenrelated prison ranges ran from one month to twenty years; a year. The law banned cannabis cultivation and required landowners and occupiers to destroy plants, while retaining a separate small amount for -personal use carries-quantity tier. It expressly repealed the 1974 ordinance and its 1977 implementing decree and allowed courts to order treatment for a lighter penalty (Article 145)dependent person convicted of specified offences.

sources

Niger pharmaceutical regulator — Legislative and regulatory compilation, 2019 edition 1 unchanged

tags

home-growing, sentencing, treatment, trafficking

Mauritania sets death penalties for repeat and aggravated drug offences

title

Mauritania's drug law allows sets death penalties for repeat offendersand aggravated drug offences

description

Law 93Producing, growing or trafficking high-37 setsrisk drugs carried fifteen to thirty years in prison and a fine, with death for producingrepeat offences; organised crime, violence, weapons or internationally trafficking high-riska death caused by the drugs could also bring capital punishment. Simple illicit use carried up to two years, and the death penalty for a repeat offencefine alone, or both, with treatment routes that could prevent prosecution. President Maaouya Ould Sid'Ahmed Taya signed the law nineteen days after Mauritania joined the UN convention against drug trafficking.

sources

United Nations Treaty Collection — 1988 convention against illicit drug trafficking, participants 1 unchanged

tags

trafficking, trade, sentencing, treatment, visitors, police-powers

unscored

The earlier national penalties remain unreconstructed; possession, cultivation and sharing already sit at zero in the retained timeline, so the capital provisions cannot support an additional whole-point drop without a historical score audit.

Luxembourg passes its drug law

description

The law on the sale of medicinal substances and the fight against drug addiction replaced the 1953 rules, under which holding cannabis without a licence was already an offence, and made using, holding and growing cannabis criminal offencesit crimes, with prison for personal use.

before

possession 102 · cultivation 101 · enforcement 103 · sharing 101 · consumption 103 · access 100

Liberia first restricts cannabis

description

No first law is recorded here for Liberia. Historians of’s public-health law prohibited cannabis cultivation and punished unauthorised possession before those criminal provisions were replaced in Africa find that most colonial governments had banned it by 1920, so its first2014. The early restriction date is assumed to fall between 1900 and 1920estimated; the documented public-health regime provides the later historical baseline.

window

1900, 19201976

sources

Liberia — Public Health Law, sections 41.22–41.24; later documented baseline for an unverified early date Chris S. Duvall — The African Roots of Marijuana (Duke University Press, 2019)

Madagascar’s Merina king bans cannabis smoking

title

TheMadagascar’s Merina kingdomking bans cannabis smoking

description

Andrianampoinimerina prohibited cannabis smoking in the Merina kingdom; Condominas places smoking among capital offences. Molet’s account, citing the Tantara, distinguishes forbidden smoking in central Imerina from permittedwhile allowing cultivation for cloth and rope. Historical accounts describe death as a penalty, and a proverb collection says the rule was applied only briefly. The conventional 1787 date is not independently established by these passages, andremains uncertain; the restriction should not be projected uniformly across presentcolony-day Madagascarwide smoking-cannabis decree followed in 1915.

sources

Le Livre de la Sagesse Malgache 2 unchanged

tags

sentencing, hemp, traditional

Djibouti gendarmes seize 12 kg of cannabis in Balbala

tags

military, enforcement, trafficking

title

Djibouti military policegendarmes seize 12 kg of cannabis in Balbala

description

The Einguella Military Police Brigadegendarmerie brigade broke up what it called a cannabis distribution network in the Balbala district of Djibou … n estimated street value of 1.76 million Djiboutian francs. Several people were arrested, placedheld in temporary detention and were to be broughtpolice custody before a courtpresentation to the justice authorities.

sources

RTD — La Gendarmerie démantèle un réseau et saisit 12 kg de cannabis à Balbala 1 unchanged

Puerto Rico approves a law banning cannabis growing and trade

date

1932-04-19

title

Puerto Rico first restrictsapproves a law banning cannabis growing and trade

description

Puerto Rico passed narcotics laws in 1932 and 1934adopted a law to punish cannabis planting, which its 1959 Narcotics Law replacedimportation, purchase and sale. WhenThe Supreme Court later identified it as the original cannabis was first covered is not recorded here, sostatute and explained that a separate law in May 1934 re-enacted it is assumed to fall between those laws. Cannabis remained criminalised through the harsher narcotics law introduced in 1959.

estimate

true

window

1932, 1959

sources

Puerto Rico Supreme Court — Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior, 84 DPR 140 (1961), note 1 identifies Act 12 of 19 April 1932 Puerto Rico — Ley de Narcóticos, Ley Núm. 48 de 18 de junio de 1959

checked

true

tags

home-growing, trade, sentencing

Removed 1

Countries and states 9 files

Northern Mariana Islands countries/mp.yaml

sharing 3 → 5

summary

The Northern Mariana Islands legalised adult and medical use by an act of the legislature in September 2018. Adults 21 and over may carry an ounce, keep eight at home and grow their own, and licensed. Licensed shops, lounges and delivery have operated sincelounges opened in 2021; the commission reported retailer-delivery rules in 2025.

segments › cultivation › text

Adults may grow up to six mature orand twelve immature plants at homeper household or at a cultivation site they lawfully use, out of public view and secured from anyoneagainst unauthorised access and access by people under 21. Growers are asked to join aA homegrown-registry; homegrown card is required, with a statutory annual fee of $75. The 2019 amendment protected compliant growing while registry rules were unfinished, subject to obtaining a card when available. Homegrown cannabis may not be sold.

segments › cultivation › sources

pit20codeHome, codeRegistry

segments › sharing › text

Adults 21 and over may give another adult up to one ounce of usable cannabis, 16 ounces of solid products, 72 ounces of liquid products, five grams of extracts or six immature plants for noncommercial purposes. The recipient must accept the gift. Homegrown cannabis and plants may not be sold for consideration. The commission's public guidance does not set out a rule on gifts between adults.

segments › sharing › sources

pit20codeHome

segments › access › text

The CNMI Cannabis Commissioncommission licenses producers, processors, retailers, wholesalers, lounges and testing. The first dispensary opened to the publicSaipan Select held a soft opening on 1614 July 2021; seven and its grand opening on 16 July. Seven retailers renewed their licences in 2025,; the commission’s 2025 report also records amended retailer-delivery rules and retailers may delivera compliance advisory for delivery from their licensed premises.

segments › access › sources

ccr25firstShop, wikiccr25

context › medical › text

The 2018 Actlaw covers medical as well as adult use. Medical patientsA patient or caregiver may also grow their ownup to twelve mature and twenty-four immature plants when a physician considers it necessary and practical for treatment, with a registry card and physician statement. The 2019 law allows licensed sales to patients aged eighteen to twenty-one with a valid doctor’s recommendation, including qualifying recommendations from a nonresident patient’s country of origin.

context › medical › sources

pit20codeHome, wikilaw19

sources

CNMI — Cannabis Act 2018, Public Law 20-66, with governor’s item vetoes CNMI — Cannabis amendment, Public Law 21-5, 21 August 2019 CNMI Law Revision Commission — Commonwealth Code section 53006 CNMI Law Revision Commission — Commonwealth Code section 53012 Marianas Variety — First cannabis store opens doors to Saipan community, 20 July 2021 3 unchanged

Congo countries/cg.yaml

summary

Law 30-The 2025 of August 2025 punisheslaw allows a fine alone for small personal use or possession of, purchase or growing; cannabis derivatives other than oil carry a small amount with up one-to a year in-six-month prison and a fine; trading carries up to ten yearsrange.

segments › possession › text

Law 30-2025 of 22 August 2025 bans holding the plants and substances of Table I without authorisation (Article 6). For a small amount bought, held or grown for personal use, Article 53 sets 2two months to 1one year and, a fine of 100,000 to –500,000 CFA francsfranc fine, or both for a high-risk drug (drugs including cannabis oil included), and 1. Cannabis derivatives other than oil carry one to 6six months and, a 50,000 to –250,000 CFA francs for a cannabis derivative other than the oil. Usingfranc fine, or holding a highboth. No numerical small-risk drug for personal consumptionquantity threshold is also covered bydefined. Article 40: 1 separately sets one to 12twelve months and, a fine of 1,000,000 to –2 million franc fine,000,000 CFA francs or either alone for high-risk drugs held or used for personal consumption. The law text does not name cannabis in its tables, which are set by order.

segments › cultivation › text

Article 7 bans growing plants classedclassified as narcotics by the international conventions, and requires landowners must, operators and occupiers to destroy themsuch plants. GrowingOrdinary high-risk drugscultivation carries 5five to 10ten years and, a fine of 5,000,000 to –20,000,000 million CFA francs (franc fine, or both under Article 37); a small amount grown for. Small personal use falls undergrowing is covered by Article 53 and can result in a fine alone.

segments › enforcement › text

In November 2024, the official news agency reported cannabis arrests and a house search in Owando, with suspects presented to the prosecutor. The report still cited the colonial 1916 poisonous-substances law allows prison even for a small. Outcomes of ordinary personal amount (Article 53) and doubles the maximum penalties in listed aggravating-use cases (Article 56). How it is applied is not shown byunder the text2025 law remain unknown.

segments › enforcement › sources

owando2024, loi2025

segments › sharing › text

Giving or offering a high-risk drug to a persondirectly for their own useanother person’s consumption carries 1one to 2two years and, a fine of 500,000 to –1,000,000 million CFA francs (franc fine, or either alone under Article 43). Selling, distributing or holding forGeneral high-risk supply under Article 39 carries 2two to 10ten years (Article 39), a 5–20 million franc fine, or both.

segments › consumption › text

Article 52 forbids using controlled drugs without aprohibits drug use outside medical prescriptionprescriptions and orders any drug found on a user seizedpermits confiscation even without prosecution. UsingArticle 40 provides one to twelve months, a 1–2 million CFA franc fine, or either penalty alone for high-risk drugdrugs held or used for personal consumption is punished under Article 40.

context › consequences › text

The retained sources do not establish collateral consequences beyondFor offences under Articles 40–54, courts can order a foreigner’s expulsion, residence restrictions, driving restrictions and professional bans under Article 61. For prison sentences of at least one year under Articles 40–54, Article 74 restricts specified release and sentence-adjustment measures before two-thirds of the penalties described aboveterm has been served.

context › consequences › sources

loi2025

context › clubs › text

No cannabis clubs are known, and theThe drug law leaves no room for them: growing cannabisprohibits cultivation and supplying itsupply and provides no recreational club exception. Facilitating high-risk use, including through premises, carries five to another person areten years, a fine, or both prohibitedunder Article 41.

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreationalRecreational supply is prohibited for anyone, sovisitors. A small personal quantity can attract a visitor has no lawful wayfine alone under Article 53, while Article 61 allows courts to buy cannabisexpel foreigners convicted of offences under Articles 40–54, including the personal-quantity offence. The sources behind this profile describe no separate rule for visitors.

sources

ACI — Owando arrests involving cannabis and an agriculture official (20 November 2024) 2 unchanged

Djibouti countries/dj.yaml

summary

UseIllicit use carries aup to one year in prison and holding or sellingpossession up to ten under the Penal Code; cannabis use is rare, khat beinggeneral sentencing rules let courts impose just one of the local druglisted penalties.

segments › possession › text

Illegal. The Penal Code's section on trafficking and use of narcotics punishes illicit use with one year in prison and a fine of 200,000 francs (Article 359). Holding narcotics falls under Article 356, with transport, offer and sale: of the 1995 Penal Code sets ten years in prison and a fine of 500 million francsfranc fine for illicit possession, acquisition, transport or supply. The code setsdefines no personal-use amountquantity. Articles 70–73 let courts impose just one listed penalty and reduce prison terms or fines, so the listed term and fine are not invariably imposed together.

segments › cultivation › text

The Penal Code does not single out growing; producing narcotics falls under Article 355 with importing, manufacturing and exporting:sets twenty years of criminal imprisonment and a fine of 500 million francsfranc fine for illicit production, manufacture, import or export. It does not separately define a personal-growing tier. The climate makes cultivation raregeneral sentencing rules in Articles 70–73 allow one listed penalty alone and reductions in sentence.

segments › cultivation › sources

cp, wiki

segments › enforcement › text

The code's penalties are heavy on paper: one year for useIn August 2026, ten for holding or selling, twenty for producing or importing, and life for leadingthe Einguella gendarmerie reported seizing 88 cannabis packages weighing 12 kg at a trafficking groupBalbala storage site. No account of how cases are handledSeveral suspects were held in practice was found; use is low, sincepolice custody pending presentation to justice authorities. This report does not establish the legal stimulant khat is preferredusual outcome of personal-use cases.

segments › enforcement › sources

cp, wikirtd2026

segments › sharing › text

SellingGiving or offering narcotics to a persondirectly for their own useanother person’s consumption carries five years in prison and a fine of 5 million francsfranc fine under Article 358, rising to ten years where minors, schoolseducation centres or government premises are involved (Article 358). Other sale, offer and transportGeneral supply under Article 356 carries ten years (Article 356). The port is a transit point for cannabis moving from AsiaArticles 70–73 allow courts to Africa, the Middle Eastselect one penalty alone and Europereduce sentences.

segments › sharing › sources

cp, wiki

segments › consumption › text

Illicit use of narcotics is an offence under Article 359 of the Penal Code:sets one year in prison and a fine of 200,000 francs. Cannabisfranc fine for illicit use is uncommon;. The general sentencing rules allow a court to impose a fine alone or a shorter prison term. The maximum written in the legal stimulant khatoffence is the country's drug of choicenot a mandatory one-year sentence.

segments › consumption › sources

cp, wiki

segments › access › text

No legal source: theThe Penal Code punishes acquiringcriminalises illicit acquisition, holdingpossession, offering and selling narcotics alikesupply. Free-zone rules also expressly exclude cannabis, hashish and cannabis resin from the goods admitted to those commercial zones.

segments › access › sources

cp, freezone

context › consequences › text

The retained sources doFor drug offences, courts can impose professional restrictions, suspend or cancel a driving licence and confiscate property. Article 366 permits permanent exclusion, or exclusion for up to ten years, of foreigners convicted under Articles 355–357; the clause does not establish collateral consequences beyondlist the penalties described aboveseparate simple-use offence in Article 359.

context › consequences › sources

cp

context › clubs › text

No cannabis clubs are knownThe Penal Code criminalises illicit production, possession and the law leavessupply and provides no room for them: growingrecreational cannabis and supplying it to another person are both prohibited-club exception.

context › clubs › sources

wikicp

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreationalIllicit possession and supply remain offences for anyonevisitors. Foreigners convicted of production, so a visitor has no lawful wayimport, general possession or supply, or drug-money laundering under Articles 355–357 can also be excluded permanently or for up to buy cannabisten years. The sources behind this profile describe no separate rule for visitorsforeigner-exclusion clause does not list simple use or direct supply to a consumer.

context › visitors › sources

wikicp

sources

Djibouti — Penal Code, Law 59/AN/94 of 5 January 1995, Articles 70–73 and 355–368 (VERTIC copy) Djibouti official journal — Decree 2003-0202 on economic activities in free zones, Article 13 RTD — Gendarmerie seizes 12 kg of cannabis in Balbala (12 August 2026) Code pénal de la République de Djibouti, articles 355–368, trafic et usage de stupéfiants (2002 text, Equipo Nizkor) 2 unchanged

Gambia countries/gm.yaml

summary

First-time possession of 0.1–150 grams carries a fine of 50,000–100,000-dalasi or six monthsfine, one to a yeartwo years in prison, or both.

segments › possession › text

Under the Drug Control Act as amended inThe enacted 2014, a amendment gives first-time offender with betweencannabis possession its own scale. For 0.1 g and –150 g of cannabis facesgrams it allows a fine of 50,000 to –100,000 dalasi or six months, one to a yeartwo years in prison, or both. The amendment was meant; for 151–500 grams, 100,000–150,000 dalasi or two to ease prison overcrowdingfive years, but the fine is far beyond most people's meansor both; from 501 grams, so many serve the prison term in default150,000–250,000 dalasi or three to ten years, or both. The general possession rule remains separate, as do trafficking offences.

segments › possession › sources

pointamend2014, gamlaw2003

segments › cultivation › text

CultivationUnauthorised cannabis growing is prohibited. The 2014 amendment expressly extends the cultivation provision to prohibited drugs and the First Schedule, where cannabis is listed; its penalty allows a crime with heavier penaltiesfine of at least 50,000 dalasi, at least three years in prison, or both. The law separately provides for specifically authorised scientific cultivation.

segments › cultivation › sources

pointlaw2003, amend2014

segments › enforcement › text

Courts regularly impose six-figure finesPrison remains possible for small amounts offirst-time cannabis possession, with imprisonment if unpaidalongside a fine alternative. The drug agency’s 2019–2023 strategy described burdensome fines, prison sentences and limited rehabilitation, and called for alternatives for young and first-time offenders.

segments › enforcement › sources

gamamend2014, pointstrategy2019

segments › sharing › text

Trafficking carries long sentences;The 2011 amendment raised the death penaltyminimum fine in the general trafficking clause to ten million dalasi, alongside at least ten years in prison. The quantity rule covers more than ten grams of cannabis resin or two kilograms of cannabis, unless the accused proves the possession was not for drugtrafficking. Separate supply offences has been abolishedalso apply.

segments › sharing › sources

hoclaw2003, amend2010, amend2011

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreational supply for anyone. Under the Drug Control Act as amended inThe 2014, a first-time offender with betweenscale for cannabis possession starts at 0.1 g and –150 g of cannabis facesgrams, with a fine of 50,000 to –100,000 dalasi or six months, one to a yeartwo years in prison, or both; the enacted scale provides longer prison ranges for larger quantities.

context › visitors › sources

point, gamamend2014

sources

The Gambia — Drug Control Act 2003, consolidated with the 2005 amendments, Issue 1/2009 The Gambia Gazette — Drug Control (Amendment) Act 2010, Act 16, 29 October 2010 The Gambia Gazette — Drug Control (Amendment) Act 2011, Act 2, 29 April 2011 The Gambia Gazette — Drug Control (Amendment) Act 2014, Act 9, 9 October 2014 Drug Law Enforcement Agency, The Gambia — Five-Year Strategy Plan 2019–2023 6 unchanged

Liberia countries/lr.yaml

summary

Since 2023, personalCannabis use carries three to eighteenfour months to one year on a first offence under the 2023 law. Possession and growing for personal use are separate felonies; trafficking is non-bailable; dealing carries ten to twenty years.

segments › possession › text

The 2023 amendments to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act separated users from traffickersSection 14. Use89 makes unlicensed possession or purchase an offence. For Schedule I cannabis it distinguishes first-degree felony possession for personal use istrafficking from second-degree felony possession otherwise. Second-degree cases require cash bail worth twice the bond. The penalty paragraph gives 10–20 years or the Penal Law’s sentencing rules; those rules ordinarily cap a bailable second-degree felony with three to eighteen months in prison — down fromat five to twenty years under, leaving the old lawinteraction of the two clauses unresolved.

segments › possession › sources

ndcdsa23, idpcpenal

segments › cultivation › text

Cultivation isSection 14.90 distinguishes growing Schedule I cannabis for trafficking, a non-bailable first-degree felony, from growing otherwise, a second-degree felony with ten to twentycash bail worth twice the bond. Its penalty clause gives 10–20 years or sentencing under Penal Law sections 50.5–50.6. No personal plant allowance is specified.

segments › cultivation › sources

ndcdsa23

segments › enforcement › text

Much lighter for users than beforeThe enacted 2023, but still prison, law requires cash bail for cannabis-use cases and far heavierdenies bail for anything classed as dealingfirst-degree trafficking offences. First-time Schedule I use carries four months to one year; repeat use is a second-degree felony carrying one to five years or more under the stated sentencing references.

segments › enforcement › sources

nd, idpccdsa23

segments › sharing › text

SaleGiving cannabis away is covered by the supply offence and the definition of trafficking are. Schedule I trafficking is a first-degree felony, non-bailable, with ten to twentycarrying 10–20 years or sentencing under Penal Law sections 50.5–50.6.

segments › sharing › sources

ndcdsa23

segments › consumption › text

Consumption is covered by the same threeSection 14.91(a) makes unauthorised use of Schedule I drugs a first-degree misdemeanor with four months to one year, escalating on second apprehension to a second-eighteen-month offencedegree felony with one to five years or more under the sentencing references. Cash bail is required. Cannabis, resin, extracts and tinctures are listed in Schedule I. The express rehabilitation alternative appears in the separate paragraph for Schedules II–IV.

segments › consumption › sources

ndcdsa23

context › consequences › text

A felony conviction isSection 14.100 requires immediate deportation of a criminal recordnon-Liberian convicted of an offence under the drug law after serving the sentence or sanction. Section 14.101 requires drug clearance for admission, enrolment or employment in public institutions and directs private institutions to introduce such measures; failure to comply can justify refusal.

context › consequences › sources

ndcdsa23

context › planting › seeds

greyillegal

context › planting › seeds trade

unclearbanned

context › planting › text

Section 14.10882 expressly includes cannabis seeds and all parts of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2014 makes it an offence to plant, cultivate or culture a scheduled plant without a licence from the Minister, and the Act names the cannabis plant in its definition of cultivationcannabis, covering viable seeds and cuttings. The 2014 text does not mentionIt excludes sterilised seeds; the 2023 amendments were not read that cannot germinate, mature stalks and fibre, and seed oil or cake. Unlicensed possession, supply and cultivation are offences under sections 14.85, 14.89 and 14.90.

context › planting › sources

cdsa14cdsa23

context › clubs › sources

ndcdsa23

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreational supply for anyonevisitors. Under section 14.100, so a visitor has no lawful way to buy cannabis. The sources behind this profile describe no separate rulenon-Liberian convicted of any crime in the drug-law subchapter must be deported immediately after serving the sentence or sanction, including convictions for visitorsuse.

context › visitors › sources

idpccdsa23

sources

Liberia — Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2023, Ministry of Foreign Affairs printing Liberia — Penal Law, general sentencing provisions 5 unchanged

Mauritania countries/mr.yaml

summary

Prison evenThe 1993 law allows death for repeat or aggravated high-risk drug offences; simple use, can mean up to two years;, a large share of prisoners are held for possessionfine alone, or both.

segments › possession › text

Completely prohibited. TheArticle 5 of the 1993 law imposes prison even for simple use orincludes possession for personal useand purchase of high-risk drugs among offences carrying 15–30 years and a fine, with death for a maximum ofrepeat offence. The separate simple-use offence carries up to two years and, a fine alone, or both; its wording does not extend that penalty to personal possession.

segments › possession › sources

gdpo, wikil9337

segments › cultivation › text

GrowersGrowing or producing high-risk drugs carries 15–30 years and producers can be sentenced to deatha fine under Article 3 of the drug1993 law — unique in the Maghreb — though Mauritania has not carried out executions, with death for decadesa repeat offence. Article 13 also permits capital punishment in specified aggravated cases, including organised crime and violence or weapons.

segments › cultivation › sources

gdpol9337

segments › enforcement › text

Users are jailed in large numbers: one account estimates that roughly a thirdReliable figures on arrests or imprisonment of the prison population is held forcannabis users remain unknown. Khalid Tinasti's 2017 analysis described scarce Mauritanian drug offences-use data and a public debate focused on trafficking. ECPM's 2024 assessment reported a moratorium on executions, ninewith the last military-court execution in ten of them for simple possession or use1987.

segments › enforcement › sources

gdpo, ecpm2024

segments › sharing › text

Trafficking isGiving a high-risk drug to another person, including without payment, falls under Article 5's 15–30 years and a fine. Repeat offences carry death; Article 13 also permits capital offence on the statute bookpunishment for specified aggravated offences.

segments › sharing › sources

gdpol9337

segments › consumption › text

Use is punished with prisonIllicit use carries up to two years, a fine alone, or both under Article 39. Completing prescribed treatment or successful detoxification or medical supervision can prevent prosecution under Articles 44 and 51. Voluntary treatment seekers can request anonymity.

segments › consumption › sources

gdpol9337

segments › access › text

None: the drug law punishes even simple use and possession for personal useRecreational supply is prohibited. The 2008 parliamentary debate concerned controlled medicines, with prisondoctors prescribing and pharmacists dispensing under strict supervision.

segments › access › sources

gdpol9337, assembly2008

context › death penalty › text

Trafficking is a capital offence on the statute bookThe 1993 law prescribes death for repeat high-risk production, cultivation, import, export and growers and producers cantrafficking offences under Articles 3–5. Article 13 also be sentenced to deathpermits capital punishment where specified offences involve organised crime, which is unique inviolence or weapons, or drugs that caused a death. ECPM's 2024 assessment still listed these clauses and reported the Maghreblast execution in 1987, following a military-court conviction. Mauritania has not carried out executions for decades.

context › death penalty › sources

gdpol9337, ecpm2024

context › production › text

NoneTinasti's 2017 analysis cited limited earlier evidence of small cannabis production near the Senegal River in the south. Current production levels remain unknown.

context › production › sources

wikigdpo

context › products › text

NoneLegal recreational products are prohibited by the drug law.

context › products › sources

wikil9337

context › medical › text

No operating medical cannabis programme is established by the retained sources. The 2008 debate addressed the controlled supply of narcotic medicines under prescription.

context › medical › sources

wikiassembly2008

context › consequences › text

The retained sources do not establish collateral consequences beyondArticle 17 of the penalties described above1993 law requires permanent territorial exclusion for foreigners convicted of listed offences, including illicit use. Courts can also impose travel restrictions, withdraw passports and suspend driving licences. The separate use chapter contains an additional exclusion clause with inconsistent cross-references.

context › consequences › sources

l9337

context › planting › text

Law 93-37 punishes growing a high-risk drug with 15 to –30 years in prisonand a fine, and with death for a repeat offence (Article 3). Which plants count is set by ministerial order, which was not readMinisterial orders determine the domestic schedules. The law speaks of substances and plants and does not mention seeds.

context › clubs › text

No cannabis clubs are known, and theThe 1993 law leaves no room for them:prohibits growing cannabis and supplying it tohigh-risk drugs, including gifts, and provides no recreational club exception. Facilitating another person are both prohibited's use, including by providing premises, carries two to ten years and the law provides for the death penalty for the most serious drug offencesa fine.

context › clubs › sources

gdpol9337

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreational supply exception for anyonevisitors. The law imposes prison even for simpleSimple illicit use or possession for personal use, with a maximum ofcan bring up to two years and, a fine alone, or both. Article 17 requires permanent exclusion for foreigners convicted of listed drug offences, including use; the use chapter also contains a separate exclusion clause with inconsistent cross-references.

context › visitors › sources

gdpo, wikil9337

sources

Khalid Tinasti — Harm reduction, drug policy and the law in the Maghreb, focus on Tunisia and Mauritania (July 2017) ECPM — Mauritanie, la peine de mort en droit et en pratique (2024), printed pp. 2 and 6 AMI — National Assembly debate on narcotic and psychotropic drugs (21 February 2008) Wikipedia — Cannabis in Mauritania Global Drug Policy Observatory — July 2017 archive (Mauritania drug law) 1 unchanged

Niger countries/ne.yaml

summary

Cannabis is a high-risk drug under the 1999 ordinance; a small amount for. Small personal use carries one to six months in prisonpossession and growing have shorter prison ranges, a fine, trafficking ten to twenty yearsor both; a fine alone is expressly possible.

segments › possession › text

Cannabis and cannabis resin areappear in Table I (, the high-risk drugs) of Ordinance 99-42 of 23 September 1999category. ForArticle 145 gives a separate tier for small amountquantities held, bought or grown for personal useconsumption: high-risk plants or substances, Article 145 setsincluding cannabis oil, carry two months to one year and, a fine of 500,000 to –1,000,000 million CFA francs for a high, or both. Non-risk drug (cannabis oil included), andcannabis derivatives carry one to six months and, a fine of 250,000 to –500,000 CFA francs for a cannabis derivative other than the oil, or both. The court may waive the penalty for a first offender who solemnly promises not to reoffendNo gram limit is given. Larger amounts fall under Article 96 (10 to 20 years).

segments › possession › sources

law, compilation

segments › cultivation › text

Article 8 bansprohibits growing the cannabis plant, and requires landowners must, operators and occupiers to destroy plantationsplants growing on their land. Growing high-risk drugs falls under the 10-to-20-year trafficking tier;Article 145 expressly includes a small amount grown for personal use getscrop in the lighter Article 145 tiershorter penalty tiers described for possession, without a fixed plant limit.

segments › enforcement › text

The ordinancelaw allows prison even foror a fine alone for small personal amount (Article 145) and sets 10quantities. Courts may invite a dependent person convicted of specified offences to 20undergo treatment instead of or alongside punishment; evading those measures carries one to five years for the main offences, a fine, or both. How often users are jailed isThe retained sources do not shown by the textestablish typical sentencing for cannabis users.

segments › sharing › text

Giving or offering a high-risk drug to a persondirectly for their own useanother person's consumption carries one to five years and, a fine of 100,000 to –500,000 CFA francs (Article 98). Selling, distributing or deliveringboth. General high-risk trafficking under Article 96 carries 10ten to 20twenty years (Article 96), a fine of 1–20 million francs, or both.

segments › consumption › text

Article 144 forbidsprohibits using controlled drugs withoutoutside a medical prescription and orders any drug found on a user seizedpermits confiscation even without prosecution. The separate penalty set for users in the text is the possession tier of Article 145 expressly covers possession, purchase and growing for personal consumption.

context › consequences › text

The retained sources do not establish collateral consequences beyondFor the penalties described aboveproduction, trafficking and related offences listed in Articles 94–102, courts may add restrictions on residence, civic rights, travel, driving or professional activity. They may exclude a convicted foreigner permanently or for ten to twenty years. Small personal quantities are dealt with separately in Article 145.

context › consequences › sources

law

context › planting › text

Article 8 of Ordinance 99-42 bansprohibits growing the cannabis plant anywhere in the country and obliges whoever owns or occupies land to destroy anyrequires destruction of plants that come upon occupied land. Small personal cultivation still carries criminal penalties under Article 145. The ordinance doesretained clauses do not mention seedssettle ungerminated seed possession or trade separately.

context › planting › sources

o9942law

context › visitors › text

There isVisitors have no legallawful recreational supply for anyoneroute. For specified production and trafficking offences, so a visitor has no lawful wayArticle 113 permits permanent exclusion or exclusion for ten to buy cannabistwenty years of a convicted foreigner. The sources behind this profile describe no separate rule for visitorsThat clause covers Articles 94–102; small personal quantities are addressed separately in Article 145.

sources

Niger pharmaceutical regulator — Legislative and regulatory compilation, 2019 edition 2 unchanged

Puerto Rico countries/pr.yaml

summary

PossessingUnauthorised cannabis withoutpossession remains a prescription is a felony carrying a fixed three-year prison term, though first offenders can have the case dismissed afterwith probation and other alternatives available in qualifying cases. Alongside, Puerto Rico runs one of the largest medical programmes anywhere: about 115,000Medical dispensaries began serving patients, 3 in December 2016.6% of the population The health department counted 110, and more than 300 dispensaries736 active patients in 2023August 2026.

segments › possession › text

Under Article 404 of the Controlled Substances Act (Law 4 of 1971), possessing a controlle … ing of guilt and, if it is completed, have the case dismissed once in a lifetime. After a qualifying treatment assessment and with prosecution consent, a court may also impose a fine of $1,000 to $10,000 and up to six months of community service instead of prison.

segments › cultivation › sources

ley4, plateamedicalLaw

segments › consumption › sources

ley4, wikimedicalLaw

segments › access › text

NoThere is no legal adult-use sourcesupply. Medical cannabis, legal sinceThe medical route requires a 2015 executive order and Law 42 of 2017, is easy to obtain on arecommendation from an authorised doctor's certification: in January 2024 the Department of Health counted 114,818 patients, and patient identification under the number of dispensaries rose from 277 to 342 during 2023regulated programme. The most certified conditions were insomniahealth department’s August 2026 report counted 110, anxiety736 active patients and chronic pain59 registered certifying doctors. Dispensaries began serving patients in December 2016; the 2017 law supplied the statutory structure.

segments › access › sources

plateamedicalLaw, wikistats26, retailStart

context › products › sources

plateamedicalLaw, wikiplatea

context › medical › text

AThe May 2015 executive order first alloweddirected the health secretary to authorise medical usecannabis through the drug law’s procedures. Dispensary sales began in December 2016, and Law 42 of 9 July 2017 set upfollowed by the regulated system of cultivators and dispensaries under the Department of Health2017 Medical Cannabis Act. PatientsIn August 2026, anxiety was certified for insomnia (5759.34%) of active patients, anxiety (53insomnia for 55.14%) and chronic pain (43for 34.81%) make up most of the programme, which shrank slightly after mid-2023; patients may be certified for more than one condition.

context › medical › sources

wikiorder15, plateamedicalLaw, stats26, retailStart

context › consequences › text

BillsRegistered medical patients who identify themselves to decriminalise possession for personal usean employer have statutory protection against discrimination, including one in 2013 and another in 2022subject to exceptions involving safety, did not passessential duties, federal permissions or funding, and unauthorised workplace use or possession. FederalA 2022 amendment also prevents registered medical use from triggering the disability law still treats all cannabis as’s exclusion for illegal, as in the states-drug users.

context › consequences › sources

plateamedicalLaw, metro13civil22

context › visitors › text

There is no adult-use supply for anyone. Medical cannabis requiresFor medical access, article 12 of the 2017 law recognises a certification undernonresident patient’s identification from the Puerto Ricorelevant jurisdiction for entering a dispensary and possessing cannabis; the programme’s applicable conditions still govern. The law also provides for board rules recognising resident-jurisdiction patient cards.

context › visitors › sources

plateamedicalLaw

sources

Puerto Rico — Medical Cannabis Act 42-2017, incorporating Act 15-2021 Puerto Rico — Executive Order 2015-010, 3 May 2015 Puerto Rico Department of Health — Medical Cannabis Programme statistics, August 2026 Primera Hora — First medical dispensaries open, 30 December 2016 Puerto Rico — Act 90-2022, patient exception to disability-law exclusion 6 unchanged

Seychelles countries/sc.yaml

summary

Medical cannabis has been available by specialist prescription sinceCBD medicine rules introduced in 2020 require specialist assessment and public-health approval; otherwiserecreational cannabis remains illegal.

segments › possession › text

Cannabis is a Class B controlled drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act 2016 and unauthorised possession isremains a criminal offence. The 2016 Act moved away fromlaw removed the old mandatory minimums, and courts frequently impose fines or suspended sentencesminimum for small amountsthe cannabis trafficking offence considered in R v Ah Kong; the judge gave that first offender a suspended sentence and a fine.

segments › possession › sources

wikiahkong

segments › enforcement › text

FinesSentences depend on the offence and circumstances. In October 2016 Paul Ah Kong received a suspended sentences are common for userstwo-year term and a 15, but prison is used too: in000-rupee fine for trafficking 115 grams of cannabis. In January 2023 the Seychelles Kanabis Association protested the custodial cannabis sentences given to two other men for cannabis offences, calling them excessive. Very long maximums remain for growing and trafficking.

segments › enforcement › sources

nation23ahkong, wikination23

segments › access › text

NoThere is no adult-use sourcesupply. SinceRules effective from 1 July 2020 patients with specialist certification andallow an application for prescribed CBD medicines after specialist assessment, Public Health Authority approval and issuance of a permit can receive imported cannabidiol. Authorised pharmacies may dispense a maximum 30-based medical productsday supply.

context › medical › text

The 2020 regulations created a permit system: a specialist certifies the patientrules cover defined CBD medicines, with THC and specified related substances limited to 2% of the product is importedCBD content. A specialist must assess the failure of earlier treatments and dispensed underlikely benefits and risks before submitting an application. Public-health approval, a permit and a prescription are required. ItThe rules followed a court order requiring the government to allow medical useRalph Volcere’s case seeking access for his mother, who had Alzheimer’s disease.

context › medical › sources

reg, wikivolcere

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreational supply for anyone. Cannabis isThe CBD medicine rules recognise a Class B drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act 2016 and possession is a crime; courts often impose fines or suspended sentences for small amountsvisiting qualifying patient with an equivalent foreign medical document, but prison sentences are also handed down, and possession with intentrequire prior written Public Health Authority authorisation to traffic carries up to fifty yearsenter or leave Seychelles carrying the medicine.

context › visitors › sources

wiki, nation23reg

sources

Seychelles Supreme Court — R v Ah Kong, signed sentence, 26 October 2016 Seychelles Constitutional Court — Volcere v Minister for Home Affairs and others, signed judgment, 31 May 2019 5 unchanged

Articles and atlas entries 30

congo-drug-law-2025 articles/congo-drug-law-2025.md

text

The Republic of the Congo enacted a's new national drug-control law in, signed on 22 August 2025. It preserves criminal, set separate penalties for small personal cannabispossession, purchase and growing. Cannabis derivatives other than oil carried one to six months, while spelling outhigh-risk drugs including cannabis oil carried two months to one year; a lower range for a small amount than for trafficking conductfine alone was possible in either tier. ## A new national framework Law No. 30Parliament wanted a stronger response to trafficking At the [Senate's April debate](/history/congo-senate-drug-law-debate-2025 covers/), sponsor Yves Fortuné Moundele-Ngollo Ehourossia linked illicit productiondrugs to organised crime, possessionmoney laundering, manufacture, transport, traffickingcorruption and use of narcotics, psychotropic substances and precursors violence. It was signed at Brazzaville on 22 August and published inSenators approved the official journalproposal on 25 September 20257 April. The law uses schedules based on internationalCongo had [joined two UN drug-control conventions in 2004](/history/congo-single-convention-2004/). Article 7 prohibits cultivating plants classified as narcotics throughout the country and requires the owner, operator or occupier of landThe debate returned to destroy controlled plants that grow therethe need for domestic controls following those commitments. Its final article repeals earlier provisions that conflict withPresident Denis Sassou-N'Guesso signed the new act, without naming a predecessor law in August, and the official journal published it on 25 September. ## Personal-use amounts Article 52 prohibits use ofSmall personal quantities could bring a controlled drug outside a medical prescription. A drug held for illicit use is seized and confiscated by judicial decision even if the holder is not prosecuted. Article 53 applies whenfine alone The personal-quantity rule covered an illegally bought, possessed or cultivated amount is small enough to be considered intended for personalthe person's own consumption. Cannabis derivatives other thanIt set no numerical limit in grams or plants. For a high-risk drug, including cannabis oil carry one to six months' imprisonment and a, the fine ofwas 100,000–500,000 CFA francs. For a cannabis derivative other than oil, it was 50,000 to –250,000 CFA francs. Courts could impose the prison range, the fine, or either penaltyboth. Cannabis oil falls under the A separate clause addressed high-risk category: two months todrugs held or used for personal consumption, with one year andto twelve months, a 1–2 million franc fine of 100,000 to 500,000 francs, or either alone. The article sets no numerical definition of “small.” It also permits a waiver of the sentence or -quantity rule expressly overrode that clause where its execution when the person has not reached the age of criminal majority, while repeat cases may receive stricter measuresconditions were met. ## Supply and cultivation ForWider supply had longer prison ranges General high-risk drugs, sale, delivery, transport, purchase and possession carrytrafficking carried two to ten years, a 5–20 million franc fine, or both. Giving or offering such a drug todirectly for another person for personal's consumption carriescarried one to two years. Unlawful cultivation, a 500,000–1 million franc fine, or production in theeither alone. Ordinary high-risk category carriescultivation and production carried five to ten years, a 5–20 million franc fine, or both. The law provides different bands for drugs placed in its lower-risk scheduleprohibited growing narcotic plants and required landowners and occupiers to destroy plants on their land. The result is## Conviction could also affect residence and release Courts could order the framework described onexpulsion of foreigners convicted of listed offences, including small personal quantities. For specified prison sentences of at least a year, the current [Republiclaw restricted early release and sentence adjustments before two-thirds of the term had been served. It also retained a reference to the [2010 child-protection law](/history/congo-child-drug-protection-2010/) when addressing supply to minors. Small personal quantities, wider trafficking and offences affecting children consequently had different rules within [Congo profile's](/country/cg/): a small amount remains criminal, cultivation remains banned, and sharing is separately punished continuing prohibition system. In the index, the 2025 law does not move a score because the country was already recorded as prohibited. It replaces contrary rules and clarifies penalties, but the text does not establish that legal freedom changed on its commencement.

sources

ACI — Senators approve drug-control proposal 1 unchanged

model

gpt-6

gambia-first-offenders-2014 articles/gambia-first-offenders-2014.md

text

In August 2014 The Gambia's National Assembly passed the Drug Control (Amendment) Act, which lowered the penalties for introduced a separate penalty scale for first offence of possessing-time cannabis possession in October 2014. A person holding 0.1–150 grams could receive a fine of 50,000–100,000 dalasi, one to two years in prison, or both. Larger quantities brought higher fines and longer prison ranges. ## The new scale The amendmentHeavy fines were filling prisons Interior Minister Ousman Sonko presented the reform as a response to the Drug Control Actimprisonment of young people who could not pay existing fines. He argued that reducing their punishment would ease pressure on prisons and cut the public costs of keeping them there. The [earlier drug law](/history/gambia-drug-control-act-2003/) set a minimum fine of 250,000 dalasi or at least three tiersyears in prison for aunauthorised cannabis possession, with both punishments possible. The new amendment separated first-time offender caught with cannabis offenders from that general rule. Parliament passed the amendment in August. President Yahya Jammeh assented on 9 October, the date stated in the enacted law. ## Three quantity bands set the punishment The new scale distinguished smaller holdings from larger ones. Each band allowed the court to choose a fine, imprisonment, or both. | QuantityCannabis quantity | Fine in dalasi | Prison range | |---|---|---| | 0.1 g to –150 ggrams | 50,000 to –100,000 | 6 months to 1 year–2 years | | 151 g to –500 ggrams | 100,000 to –150,000 | 1 to 2–5 years | | 501 ggrams and above | 150,000 to –250,000 | 2 to 3–10 years | A court may imposeThe lower band substantially reduced the minimum fine facing a first offender. A custodial sentence remained available throughout the scale, and the highest band allowed a prison term, or both reaching ten years. ## The amendment also changed enforcement rules The same actlaw renamed the National Drug Enforcement Agency as the Drug Law Enforcement Agency. ##, The reasons given The interior ministerGambia. It also expanded several cultivation, Ousman Sonko, toldproduction and other drug provisions to refer expressly to prohibited drugs alongside controlled drugs. Those changes connected the Assembly thatreform to the bill separated outwider operation of the punishment for firstdrug-time offenderscontrol law. He pointed to the number of young people being arrestedCannabis and convictedcannabis resin were listed as prohibited drugs, 1,538 between 2010 and 2013, and saida classification that remained in place as the aimsnew possession bands were to avoid jailing more of them, to relieve crowded prisons and to cut public spendingintroduced. He also said ## The debate continued after the existinglower scale The agency’s [2019–2023 strategy plan](/history/gambia-drug-strategy-rehabilitation-2019/) described continued problems with burdensome fines could be too heavy for Gambian youths, prison sentences and limited rehabilitation. A regional It called for a review of drug laws published in 2017 describes the amendment the same way: it reduced prison termsand alternatives such as community service for small amounts so that people could return to society after serving a sentenceyoung and first-time offenders. The review adds that a fine remained the only alternative to prisonplan also proposed counselling, skills training and that it did not apply in every caserehabilitation facilities. ## What it did not change Possession of any amount without a licence stayed a crime, and the lowest fine on the new The first-offender scale had reduced some penalties, 50,000 dalasi, is beyondwhile the meansquestion of most people, so many serve the prison term in default. Possession for trafficking can bring ten years or more, accordinghow to the same review. Ten years on, the drug agency reported 1,219help people arrested in 2024, with cannabis making up more than halfavoid repeated imprisonment remained part of all seizures. ## Why the index moved The index moveddrug-policy debate in [The Gambia](/country/gm/) from 7 to 9 with the [2014 amendment](/history/gambia-first-offenders-2014/). Only enforcement changed, from 0 to 1: a first offence with a small amount now has its own lower scale of months or a fine. Possession stays at 1 because it remains a crime at every quantity.

model

opusgpt-5.56

sources

The Gambia Gazette — Drug Control (Amendment) Act 2014, Act 9, 9 October 2014 The Gambia — Drug Control Act 2003, consolidated with the 2005 amendments, Issue 1/2009 Drug Law Enforcement Agency, The Gambia — Five-Year Strategy Plan 2019–2023 International Drug Policy Consortium and West Africa Commission on Drugs — Drug laws in West Africa, annex of country profiles, November 2017 (PDF) The Point — Gambians lead in drug abuse cases, says DLEAG DG (27 June 2025) 1 unchanged

madagascar-merina-ban-1787 articles/madagascar-merina-ban-1787.md

text

King Andrianampoinimerina prohibited cannabis smoking in the Merina kingdom of Madagascar. Later historical accounts associate the offence with severe punishment, including death. They also preserve an important distinction: cultivationcentral Imerina while allowing people to grow hemp for cloth and rope. Historical accounts describe death as a penalty for smoking, but a collection of Malagasy proverbs says the rule was allowedapplied only briefly. The conventional date 1787 does not come withepisode belongs to the history of a verified day or surviving decree examined hereroyal highland kingdom whose territory differed from modern Madagascar. ## Smoking and useful cultivationGrow hemp, but do not smoke it Louis Molet reproduces a royal statement, citing drawn from the Tantara collection of Merina history. The speaker prohibits consuming orking addresses people growing cannabis for textiles and cordage, approving those uses while threatening punishment for smoking hempit in the heart of Imerina while expressly permitting people to cultivate it for textiles and cordage. ThisFor growers, that distinction changesmattered: the meaning of the familiar phrase “the king banned cannabis.” Thesame plant had several uses,supplied useful fibre and thean intoxicating preparation. The reported command treated them differently. It supports a restriction on intoxicating consumption; it does not establish that everyleft room for hemp field or fibre usefields and the work of making cloth and rope. Its target was outlawedsmoking. The royalking's explanation linksconnected smoking with loss of reason. That is evidence ofThe surviving account places the ruler’s stated justification as transmitted through later textsrestriction within royal efforts to regulate behaviour, rather than a present-day medical assessmentalongside rules about alcohol. ## Punishment and royal authorityDeath as a punishment, briefly applied Georges Condominas placeslists hemp smoking among capital offences in his discussion ofunder Andrianampoinimerina’s monarchy. His accountdiscussion connects the king’s rules aboutgoverning personal conduct with measures protectingthe protection of royal authority and the unity of the kingdom. Condominas also describes tobacco and alcohol restrictionsA different perspective survives in that political setting. His rhetoricthe commentary attached to a proverb about intoxicationa hemp smoker's heart. In *Le Livre de la Sagesse Malgache*, Paul de Veyrières and Guy de Méritens describe the previous court reflects the perspective of his historical accountking introducing death as a punishment to discourage smoking. It should not be mistaken for independent clinical evidence aboutThey add that the effectslaw was applied only briefly. That recollection makes enforcement part of cannabisthe story. Together The royal threat was severe, but the two sources strengthen the identification ofproverb's commentary describes a royal restriction while showing why its scope needs precision. Neither passage supplies a detailed recordshort period of cannabis prosecutionsapplication, without supplying dates or a count of executions. ## A kingdom and an uncertain year The relevant jurisdiction was Imerina underand the king’s authority. It was not identical to the territory of the present Republic of Madagascar. A statement about the heart of the kingdom cannot establish uniform policing across the whole island.conventional date The existing history entry usesis conventionally dated 1787 as its conventional date. The additional passages examined here support attribution tohistorical passages attribute the reign, but do not independently fix enactmentban to thatAndrianampoinimerina, while leaving its precise year unresolved. The article therefore treats Molet's reproduced statement specifically addresses central Imerina. Its geography matters when comparing this royal restriction with later laws issued for the precise date as unresolvedwhole colony and its dependencies. The highland smoking ban forms an early regional chapter in Madagascar's cannabis history. ## What this history does establishA colony-wide ban followed in 1915 The episode records[colonial decree of October 1915](/history/madagascar-colonial-rongony-ban-1915/) prohibited preparation, peddling, sale and consumption of smoking cannabis throughout Madagascar and its dependencies. Its penalties reached one year in prison, with a locally articulated prohibitionfine possible instead of or alongside custody. [Growing and possession offences followed in 1958](/history/madagascar-cultivation-possession-penalties-1958/), before the modern international drug[1960 government raised penalties](/history/madagascar-control systemrongony-penalties-raised-1960/) to as much as five years. It cannot be calledThose dated laws trace the oldest banlater expansion of cannabis controls in this index now that medieval restrictions are included. It also cannot establish a continuous legal regime from the king’s reign to contemporary [Madagascar](/country/mg/). The historical consumption ban and the continuing usefulness of hemp need to remain visible as separate parts of the record.

sources

Le Livre de la Sagesse Malgache 2 unchanged

seychelles-medical-2020 articles/seychelles-medical-2020.md

text

On 28 February 2020 the minister responsible Patients in Seychelles could apply for home affairs, Macsuzy Mondon, signed regulationsapproval to obtain prescribed CBD medicines under section 54 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 2016, made in consultation with the health minister. They came into operationrules that took effect on 1 July 2020. Their stated object is "lawful access to medicinal cannabis as an alternative treatment",Access depended on a specialist’s assessment and they tie it toa permit from the right to the protection of health in Article 29 of the ConstitutionPublic Health Authority. The permitted products were tightly defined, while smoking and growing cannabis remained prohibited. ## A narrow productfamily’s court case preceded the rules The [2016 drug law](/history/seychelles-misuse-of-drugs-2016/) allowed controlled drugs to be used medically under regulations use. [Ralph Volcere challenged the words "medicinal cannabis"absence of new rules](/history/seychelles-volcere-medical-rules-2019/) while seeking access for his mother, butwho had Alzheimer’s disease. In May 2019 the definition is tightConstitutional Court ordered ministers to issue regulations within twenty-four months, leaving their content to the government. Home Affairs Minister Macsuzy Mondon made the CBD rules the following February, in consultation with the minister responsible for health. ## Only defined CBD medicines qualified The product must beregulations covered products made from cannabidiol, including edible preparations, ointments and any tinctures intended for use without smoking. Their definition excluded forms of cannabis producing a psychoactive effect. THC-type substance and the related substances specified in it may bethe rules could together amount to no more than 2%two per cent of the CBD content. The two-per-cent limit was measured against the amount of cannabidiolCBD in the product. It must be meant The Health Care Agency could import medicines for use "other than by smoking": edibles, ointments and tinctures are namedits pharmacies or authorised pharmacies. The definition adds that cannabidiol "shall not include any form of cannabis that givesOther importers needed a psychoactive effect"licence. Patients, including qualifying visitors, needed prior written permission to enter or leave Seychelles with the medicine. ## The route toApproval came before a prescription | Step | Rule | |---|---| | Who applies | A specialist, for a had to assess the patient in continuing care (regulation 7) | | Test | Otherand conclude that earlier prescribed treatments have failedhad been ineffective, that CBD medicine might help, and benefitsthat likely outweighbenefits outweighed the risks | | Who decides |. The application also required a plan for continued care. The Public Health Authority, reviewed the certification with the Medical and Dental Council | | Result | Patient entered in a. Approval led to confidential registerregistration and given a permit | | Dispensing | A Health Care Agency pharmacy or one it authorises, followed by a prescription. Pharmacies could dispense no more than a 30thirty-day supply | Only the Health Care Agency may import the products withoutat a licencetime. A patient may not enter or leave Seychelles with them without written authorisation, though the regulations recognise The rules allowed designated caregivers to obtain and administer medicine for a "visiting qualifying patient" holding an equivalent foreign document. ## What stayed forbidden Regulation 19 says, "for the avoidance of any doubt", that a person shall not cultivate or smoke cannabis of any form or type, They also provided extra consent and lets police arrest a suspect without a warrantapproval requirements for children. ## Patients still faced strict boundaries Using the medicinal productmedicine without the Authority's permission is an offence too, withauthorisation could bring a fine of up to 10,000 rupees or, up to six months in prison. A doctor who makes a false statement on a certification faces a fine of at least 20,000 rupees or up to two yearsboth. ## Why the index moved Before July 2020 nothing derived from cannabis could lawfully be obtained in Seychelles. The regulations opened one supervised channelexpressly prohibited cultivating or smoking any form of cannabis and allowed police to arrest suspects without a warrant. In [January 2023, the Seychelles Kanabis Association criticised the rules](/history/seychelles-kanabis-association-sentencing-2023/) as unfit for cannabidiol products with almost no THCpatients’ needs, so access rose from zerolinking difficulties obtaining treatment to onethe risk of criminal punishment. They leftIts intervention kept patient access part of the rest alone and restated it: growing and smokingwider cannabis remain offences, so no other score changed-law debate in [Seychelles](/country/sc/).

model

opusgpt-5.56

sources

Seychelles Constitutional Court — Volcere v Minister for Home Affairs and others, signed judgment, 31 May 2019 Seychelles Nation — Seychelles Kanabis Association decries sentencing for cannabis-related offences, 30 January 2023 1 unchanged

Datasets 8

Code, design and documents 24 files

datasets/datasets.yaml +195 −0
@@ -825,2 +825,197 @@
     - { label: the population column of the rankings, path: "#rankings" }
     - { label: research progress weighted by population, path: research/ }
+- id: espad_availability
+  file: espad-2024-cannabis-availability.csv
+  name: Is cannabis easy to get? (students, Europe)
+  publisher: ESPAD Group and the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA)
+  credit: ESPAD
+  title: ESPAD Report 2024 — Results from the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs, table 3b
+  url: https://www.espad.org/espad-report-2024
+  data_url: https://www.euda.europa.eu/system/files/documents/2025-10/espad-2024-report-source-tables.xlsx.zip
+  data_label: source tables, spreadsheet (table 3b)
+  when: surveyed in 2024
+  about: >-
+    The per cent of students aged 15 to 16 who say cannabis would be "fairly easy" or "very easy"
+    to get if they wanted it, overall and for boys and girls, in 37 European countries. A school
+    survey with the same questionnaire everywhere.
+  origin: >-
+    The EUDA's site refuses scripted downloads, so the spreadsheet of source tables was opened in
+    a browser on 21 October 2026 and the cannabis columns of table 3b were read from it and
+    written here, rounded to two decimals.
+  profile:
+    headline: "{easy} of students say it is easy to get"
+    details: "{easy_boys} of boys · {easy_girls} of girls · aged 15–16 · 2024"
+  country: { column: country, by: id }
+  fields:
+    easy: { column: easy, format: percent, decimals: 1, about: "Students who say cannabis is easy to get: Charts page and profile" }
+    easy_boys: { column: easy_boys, format: percent, decimals: 1 }
+    easy_girls: { column: easy_girls, format: percent, decimals: 1 }
+  map:
+    field: easy
+    format: percent
+    group: Use
+    slug: easy-to-get
+    label: Students who say cannabis is easy to get
+    missing: Not in the 2024 ESPAD school survey
+    steps: [[0, "Under 15%"], [15, "15–22%"], [22, "22–29%"], [29, "29–36%"], [36, "36% or more"]]
+    title: How easy is cannabis to get? Students in Europe
+    lede: >-
+      The share of students aged 15 to 16 who say cannabis would be fairly or very easy to get,
+      from the 2024 ESPAD school survey in 37 European countries. The stronger the blue, the
+      easier it is to get.
+    sub: >-
+      The stronger the blue, the more students aged 15 to 16 say cannabis would be easy to get.
+      Countries outside the ESPAD survey are hatched.
+    note: >-
+      ESPAD Report 2024, table 3b: students answering "fairly easy" or "very easy". Not part of
+      the score.
+  pages:
+    - { label: its map, path: map/easy-to-get/ }
+    - { label: the Charts page, path: charts/#easy-to-get }
+- id: wastewater
+  file: euda-wastewater-cannabis.csv
+  original: euda-wastewater-cannabis-cities.csv
+  name: Cannabis in wastewater
+  publisher: European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA) and the SCORE group
+  credit: EUDA
+  title: EUDA — Drugs in municipal wastewater in Europe, source data (2025), tables 1 and 2
+  url: https://www.euda.europa.eu/data/repository/drugs-municipal-wastewater-europe-source-data-2025_en
+  data_url: https://www.euda.europa.eu/sites/default/files/data/data-nodes/32462/versions/20/ww2025-all-data_en.csv
+  data_label: table 2, all data (CSV)
+  when: 2011 to 2024
+  about: >-
+    THC-COOH, the main substance the body makes from cannabis, measured in the sewage of cities
+    over one week a year: milligrams a day per 1,000 people served. Not a count of users, as the
+    load depends on how much and how often people use; but it measures what is used rather than
+    what people admit. A country's figure is the mean of its measured cities, weighted by the
+    people each plant serves; one city may stand for a whole country.
+  origin: >-
+    The EUDA's site refuses scripted downloads, so its tables 1 and 2 were read in a browser on
+    21 October 2026; the cannabis rows, with each site's population, are kept in
+    euda-wastewater-cannabis-cities.csv. scripts/extract-wastewater.py averages them by country
+    and year.
+  profile:
+    headline: "{thc_cooh} mg of THC-COOH a day per 1,000 people"
+    details: "{cities} cities measured · {year}"
+    each: "{thc_cooh} in {year}"
+  country: { column: country, by: id }
+  year: { column: year }
+  fields:
+    thc_cooh: { column: thc_cooh, format: decimal, about: "Milligrams of THC-COOH a day per 1,000 people: Charts page and profile" }
+    cities: { column: cities, about: "How many cities were measured" }
+    served: { column: population, about: "How many people the measured plants serve" }
+  map:
+    field: thc_cooh
+    format: rate
+    group: Use
+    since: 2020
+    slug: wastewater
+    label: Cannabis in wastewater
+    missing: No city measured for cannabis since 2020
+    steps: [[0, "Under 30"], [30, "30–60"], [60, "60–100"], [100, "100–200"], [200, "200 or more"]]
+    title: Cannabis in city sewage
+    lede: >-
+      THC-COOH, the substance the body makes from cannabis, in the sewage of measured cities:
+      milligrams a day per 1,000 people, latest year since 2020. The stronger the blue, the more
+      cannabis was used there.
+    sub: >-
+      The stronger the blue, the more THC-COOH a day per 1,000 people. One or a few cities stand
+      for each country; countries with none measured since 2020 are hatched.
+    note: >-
+      EUDA and SCORE group, wastewater monitoring, one week a year; cities averaged by the people
+      each plant serves. Not part of the score.
+  pages:
+    - { label: its map, path: map/wastewater/ }
+    - { label: the Charts page, path: charts/#wastewater }
+- id: colonial_links
+  file: cepii-colonial-links.csv
+  original: geo_cepii.xls
+  name: Former colonial rulers
+  publisher: CEPII
+  title: CEPII — GeoDist, country file (geo_cepii), Mayer and Zignago (2011)
+  url: https://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/bdd_modele_item.asp?id=6
+  data_url: https://www.cepii.fr/distance/geo_cepii.xls
+  data_label: geo_cepii.xls
+  when: compiled 2011
+  about: >-
+    The countries that ruled each country as a colony for a long time, as CEPII records them for
+    its trade studies, up to four per country; those whose rule was short or light are listed
+    apart. Licensed under Etalab 2.0.
+  origin: >-
+    Downloaded unchanged on 21 October 2026. scripts/extract-cepii.py keeps one row per country
+    and writes the colonisers as country file names.
+  profile:
+    headline: "Once ruled by {colonizer_names}"
+  country: { column: country, by: id, aliases: { tp: tl, yu: rs, zr: cd } }
+  fields:
+    colonizers: { column: colonizers, type: text, about: "Former colonial rulers, as country file names: Charts page" }
+    colonizer_names: { column: colonizer_names, type: text, format: text, about: "Their names, for the profile" }
+  pages:
+    - { label: the Charts page, path: charts/#empire }
+- id: canada_sourcing
+  file: health-canada-cannabis-sourcing.csv
+  original: health-canada-cannabis-usual-source.csv
+  name: Where people in Canada get their cannabis
+  publisher: Health Canada
+  title: Health Canada — Cannabis use (non-medical) in Canada, Canadian Cannabis Survey, figure 3 (usual source)
+  url: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/cannabis/
+  data_url: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/src/data/cannabis-use/cannabisUsualSource.csv
+  data_label: figure 3 data (CSV)
+  when: 2018 to 2024
+  about: >-
+    The usual source of cannabis of people who used it in the past year, in per cent: a legal
+    store or website, friends and family (social), an illegal seller, growing it themselves, or
+    another source. The 2018 survey came before the first legal stores opened, so it has no legal
+    figure.
+  origin: >-
+    The CSV behind the figure was downloaded unchanged on 21 October 2026 and is kept as
+    health-canada-cannabis-usual-source.csv; scripts/extract-canada.py (sourcing) writes one row
+    per year.
+  profile:
+    headline: "{legal} bought from a legal source"
+    details: "{social} from friends and family · {illegal} illegally · {grown} grew it · {year}"
+    each: "{legal} in {year}"
+  country: { column: country, by: id }
+  year: { column: year }
+  fields:
+    legal: { column: legal, format: percent, about: "Bought from a legal store or website: Charts page and profile" }
+    social: { column: social, format: percent }
+    illegal: { column: illegal, format: percent }
… 39 more lines
datasets/geo_cepii.xls +0 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

docs/research/history-cnmi-gap-2026-10-21.md +42 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# Northern Mariana Islands history gap, 21 October 2026
+
+## Scope and sources
+
+Eight new events and four articles fill the gap between an estimated early ban, the 2018 legalisation and the 2021 retail opening. Rechecked `docs/WRITING.md` and current category/tag definitions. All new and rewritten events carry supported tags. Research and build verification live in `tmp/history-cnmi-gap-2026-10-21/`; research files are retained and the generated site is deleted after verification.
+
+Primary statutes and current posted code actually read:
+
+- https://www.cnmilaw.org/pdf/public_laws/20/pl20-66.pdf : 2018 legalisation, governor's signing statement and item vetoes, definitions, household/gift rules, registry, licensing framework, offence thresholds, repealer and effective date. Approval 21 September 2018 is visible on final PDF page 67 and cover. Visually inspected PDF pages 1, 24, 25 and 67. Six mature AND twelve immature plants are household/site limits, not an either/or choice. Medical allowance twelve mature/twenty-four immature requires physician necessity and documentation. Noncommercial gifts up to one ounce usable cannabis, 16 oz solid, 72 oz liquid, 5 g extracts or six immature plants expressly permitted; recipient acceptance required. Do not repeat the profile's former claim that gifts are unclear.
+- https://www.cnmilaw.org/pdf/public_laws/21/pl21-05.pdf : full 2019 amendment and signing statement. Effective on approval, 21 August 2019, visually checked final page 16. Registry clause and $75 fee visually checked page 10. The governor vetoed proposed $5 registration, flat business fees and tax terms in 2018; do not present crossed-out text as enacted. Amendment supplies varied business fees, 15% excise and retailer surtax of 15%, 7.5% for medical revenue. Public school allocation is a quarter of the relevant appropriation, not necessarily a quarter of all gross retail sales. Protects compliant home cultivation while rules unavailable, card required when available. Age 18–21 patient-sales exception includes valid nonresident country-of-origin recommendation. Governor's letter flags inconsistent medical exceptions in public/minor-presence rules; this batch does not resolve them judicially.
+- https://www.cnmilaw.org/pdf/public_laws/21/pl21-25.pdf : full hemp Act, approved 18 May 2020 despite short title '2019'. Division of Agriculture gains primary production oversight and power to set licence requirements consistent with federal plan requirements, cannabis commission hemp remit removed. 0.3% definition includes additional product/THCA language; don't simplify it to a certified delta-9-only testing protocol. Negligent violations correction plan, 3 in 5 years yields five-year ineligibility; wilful up to 1 year OR $2,500 OR both. Visually checked PDF pages 6–7. No claim of USDA plan approval, active hemp farms or unrestricted hemp sales from this Act alone.
+- https://cnmilaw.gov/docs/cmc_section/T4/53006.pdf : current posted three-page codification, full text; source note attributes gift and household section to 2018, without a later substantive amendment. Confirms home-growing, medical and gifting correction today.
+- https://cnmilaw.gov/docs/cmc_section/T4/53012.pdf : current posted registry code, full text, source note 2018 and 2019. Statutory annual fee $75; profile calls it statutory because later regulatory reductions may affect payable fees.
+
+## Implementation and reporting dates
+
+- https://governor.cnmi.gov/archived-news/press-releases-archive/cnmi-cannabis-commission-adopts-emergency-regulations/ : official release 11 March 2020, unanimous commission meeting 10 March. Emergency adoption, subject to governor concurrence and maximum 120 days. Reserved medical, lab and edible rules for future work. Economic rationale COVID revenue shortfall/diversification attributed to officials, not asserted as measured economic result. September 2019 organisational meeting; no day invented.
+- https://governor.cnmi.gov/archived-news/press-releases-archive/saipan-select-llc-becomes-first-cannabis-producer-class-iii/ : official release 13 May 2021 explicitly gives licensing on 12 May. FY2021 report instead lists Saipan Select licensed 13 May. Event uses contemporaneous release's explicit action date; difference retained here. More than twenty applications/seven approvals in principle at that point; many waiting for premises inspections/construction. August 2020 application intake, March 2021 first producer. Approval in principle is not an operating licence.
+- https://opd.gov.mp/library/reports/cannabis-ccr-2021.pdf : commission's FY2021 report, full relevant page 2 visually inspected. First Class I producer Slider Marianas/T-Marianas 11 March 2021. Saipan Select and Lumar/CanaMariana's follow. Commonwealth Cannabis retail licence 16 July, lounge licence 21 July; this conflicts with news account giving both on 21 July. No exact first lounge-opening day established. Fifteen active homegrown cards, three retail and three producer licences plus one lounge in September 2021 snapshot, not current counts.
+- https://www.mvariety.com/business/first-cannabis-store-opens-doors-to-saipan-community/article_48e87c4c-e85d-11eb-8dad-1f1aea8d7909.html/ : 20 July 2021 on-site report with grower/staff tour and customer photographs. Soft opening 14 July, grand opening 16 July; earlier event/profile used only 16 July. Corrected first-access date to 14 July. Five-thousand-square-foot farm, one-ounce maximum purchase, smaller sizes. Opening article omits advertised medical efficacy claims.
+- https://www.mvariety.com/news/nmis-first-cannabis-lounge-opens-in-garapan/article_a8a8f5f2-fd53-11eb-919f-57eb93c81806.html/ : 16 August 2021 report/interview with general manager Alexis Hofschneider and acting commission director Janina Maratita. Report says first lounge now open, bring-own/purchase next door, 21+ checks. Event explicitly dated to report, not a fabricated opening day. July licence date alone does not establish consumer access.
+- https://www.justice.gov/archive/ndic/pubs5/5047/5047p.pdf : NDIC October 2003 assessment, printed pp. 5–6 read. Describes 2000–2001 crop eradication reducing local supply and greater imports, resulting price increase, enforcement shifting to controlled purchases/interdiction. It expressly says survey data insufficient to quantify use. Event date is assessment publication, not a precise raid date. Historical prices not entered as current national price data or compared as equivalent to gram retail flower.
+
+## Score correction
+
+The current profile's gift score 3 (grey area) contradicted the original and current codified rule permitting capped noncommercial adult gifts. Corrected sharing to 5, matching the rubric. Updated the 2021 shop's `before.sharing` to 5 so the right attaches to the 2018 legalisation, not a fictional 2021 change. Current overall rounded score 53 → 55 is a factual correction, not a new 2026 reform.
+
+The old shop entry bundled access and consumption gains. Added a separate first-lounge event with `before.consumption: 3` and access already 6. Retail opening now moves only access 0 → 6; lounge report marks the evidenced subsequent consumption 3 → 4. The date is a latest verified operating date, not the precise start of lounge service. Other numerical components and the existing FREE and pre-2018 vectors are preserved, not newly certified. Intended chain: 100 → 11 → 48 → 54 → 55. Pre-2018 law/first-restriction reconstruction remains open.
+
+Categories: 2018, first shop and first lounge legalisation; 2003 practical enforcement; 2020 hemp specialised hemp category; mixed 2019 financial/registry amendment, rulemaking and business licences other. No premature score for an application, approval in principle, hemp remit transfer or business licence preceding actual consumer supply.
+
+## Earlier court history added
+
+Read the full original Commonwealth v. Atalig decision of 13 February 1987, https://www.cnmilaw.gov/pdf/cr/vol2/2-CR-1006.pdf , printed pp. 1006–1015; visually inspected PDF pages 4, 7 and 9. The case concerns a 12 September 1981 Rota–Saipan flight, boxes of deer meat and five pounds of cannabis, a fruit-fly quarantine and a no-contest possession conviction. Sentence one year suspended except thirty days and $1,000. A 1983 jury-rights reversal was itself reversed by the Ninth Circuit in 1984; the 1987 judgment addresses the separate search question. Do not call the 1983 outcome final or assume five pounds were for personal use. The search holding depends on a valid administrative quarantine, indiscriminate inspection of affected arrivals and no criminal-investigation pretext, not a general power to search any domestic cannabis traveller. Case category enforcement, with court/police-powers/sentencing tags; no numerical step. Article adds the named person and full outcome rather than a generic prohibition claim. Original Trust Territory drug law remains a retrieval lead.
+
+## Verification
+
+Scoped source verifier passed: four articles at 426/402/385/400 words, four sections each, all internal destinations, unique event IDs, categories/tags and country-source references. Eight new events bring the CNMI timeline from three to eleven entries. Whole repository at verification: 2,765 events and 649 articles. CNMI gift correction and separate retail/lounge score transitions verified; unchanged other profile segments/context and pre-2018 vectors checked against pre-edit baseline. Concurrent non-CNMI work was left intact.
+
+Isolated Astro build passed: 3,506 pages in 26.51 seconds. Generated history export, country timeline, tag routes, article headings, citations and internal links passed. Generated score export confirms sharing 5, overall 55 (54.5 exact); generated history confirms 11→48 for 2018, 48→54 for retail and 54→55 for lounge. Initial verifier assumed lowercase score-export IDs; corrected the verifier to the observed uppercase `MP` schema and reran successfully without rebuilding.
+
+Deleted `tmp/history-cnmi-gap-2026-10-21/site/` after successful verification. Final temporary build-directory and generated-history-page audits returned no matches. PDFs, research text/renders, pre-edit baselines, build log and verifier retained.

docs/research/history-congo-gap-2026-10-21.md +206 −113
@@ -1,113 +1,206 @@
-# DR Congo: consumption offences and the basis for medical licensing
-
-21 October 2026. This pass prioritises a country with a large population and
-only nine existing events. Its timeline jumped from a colonial 1903 restriction
-to recent medical regulations, with treaty accessions between. Added the
-1917 consumption amendment and 2018 statutory medical/scientific exception;
-wrote a 1917 article; corrected the 1903 article and the 2021 entry.
-
-Baseline: `tmp/history-congo-gap-2026-10-21/changes-before.yaml`.
-The prior 1903 article is also saved there. Source downloads, text and page
-images are in `tmp/pdfs/congo-gap-2026-10-21/`.
-
-## 1903 and 1917 must be separated
-
-Downloaded the complete *Les Codes Larcier, République démocratique du Congo,
-Tome II: Droit pénal* from the university library mirror. The file was saved
-locally with `code2004` in its name, but its title/copyright and page footer
-establish the **2003** edition, ISBN 2-8044-0968-6. The legal reproduction is
-on printed **p. 255, PDF p. 267**, read in full and visually inspected.
-
-Its article 1 and the second paragraph of article 3 are explicitly bracketed
-as amendments of **10 March 1917**. These provide the express consumption
-prohibition and confiscation of consumption equipment. The rest of the text
-contains the compensation window, penalties, village-chief liability with an
-exception for reporting offences, and destruction provisions. The amended
-text is reproduced without amendment dates on Leganet; its Belgian-domain
-page was read in full while the Congolese-domain URL timed out.
-
-Reread Duvall, *The African Roots of Marijuana* (2019), pp. 188–189, from the
-retained full book text. This independently attributes farming, sale, transport
-and possession restrictions and the compensation offer to 1903 and discusses
-the suppression of informal networks. It supports the narrower description of
-the original law and context for the rewritten article. Neither new prose nor
-the category claims consumption was previously free of every possession rule.
-
-The old 1903 article incorrectly placed the entire later consolidated text in
-1903 and used that attribution to explain the index score. Replaced it under
-the current writing guide, preserving its URL, removing the numeric scoring
-explanation and separating the later consumption/equipment clauses. Existing
-historical score vectors remain unchanged **without revalidation**: the 1903
-step still carries a consumption decrease which needs separate reconstruction.
-The new `tightening` event has an explicit `unscored` explanation. Its date is
-the amendment date in the legal collection; an independent 1917 publication
-or commencement date was not recovered.
-
-The League of Nations scan `unodc0586f.pdf` was discovered as an indexed lead,
-with a 1917 amendment on p. 7 and a 1933 pharmacy summary on p. 8. The UN file
-and record routes returned 403, inaccessibility or empty files; no claims are
-credited to having read that PDF. The 1917 entry instead cites the actual legal
-collection obtained. The 1933 pharmacy law remains a follow-up gap rather than
-an event made from snippets. A pharmacy-code search result on Manualzilla
-mixes the colonial text with later Burundian laws; it was not treated as an
-original Congolese enactment.
-
-## 2018 precedes the 2021 licensing conditions
-
-Downloaded and read the Droitcongolais reproduction of **Law 18/035 of
-13 December 2018**. Visually checked PDF pp. 17–19, especially articles
-118–122, 132, 143 and 144. The law allows cultivation, production, possession
-and commercialisation of narcotics/psychotropics only for medical and scientific
-purposes and requires permission and ministerial conditions. It also supplies
-record/inspection rules. The statutory instrument's date is **promulgation**;
-article 144 defers operation for three months. The description states this
-delay rather than claiming immediate commencement or guessing a counting rule.
-The 2018 event is `medical`, without an invented access vector or an assertion
-that patients received cannabis then.
-
-Downloaded the complete **2021 ministerial order**, including its cover
-letters. Read the preamble and relevant provisions; visually checked printed
-pp. **3–4, 8 and 27**, PDF pp. **5–6, 10 and 29**. Articles 1–5 reserve the
-channel to medical/scientific purposes, require Congolese legal entities and
-industrial cultivation, and specify medical cannabis with at most 0.2% of the
-substance the text calls THC and a high CBD content. Article 23 supplies the
-five-year cultivation/production authorisations. Article 101 makes the order
-effective on signature; the signature page visibly reads **27 February 2021**.
-The forwarding letters refer to 2 March, which was not substituted for the
-signed act's date. The order's preamble expressly cites the 2018 law.
-
-The old 2021 description conflated industrial **scale** with a permitted
-nonmedical industrial **purpose**. The original order's article 1 permits
-medical and scientific purposes only. Corrected that distinction and replaced
-the Wikipedia-only basis with the original order, retaining the existing date,
-category and stable ID. No current-country profile was changed, and no current
-sentencing conclusion is drawn from article 132's general drug offence.
-
-## Categories, tags and coverage limits
-
-1903 remains the existing `ban`, with colonial, eradication and sentencing
-tags. The 1917 extension is `tightening`, with colonial, sentencing and
-advertising/paraphernalia tags, the last for consumption equipment.
-The 2018 event is `medical`; the patient tag is not assigned to a general
-permission statute with no documented patient case, group or supply service.
-The 2021 event is `medical` and tagged CBD for the specified cannabis varieties.
-Earlier/later links connect 1903 → 1917 → 2018 → 2021 → 2022.
-
-The 1933 pharmacy system and most post-independence enforcement history remain
-substantive gaps. This pass improves the legal sequence without presenting
-the country as comprehensively covered.
-
-## Verification
-
-Preservation checks passed: all 2,650 baseline events remain, every prior
-`before` vector is unchanged, and only the existing 1903 and 2021 events were
-edited. The two additions bring the dataset to 2,652 events and 590 articles.
-Article metadata, controlled tags, related IDs and internal links passed;
-the rewritten 1903 article has 405 words and the new 1917 article 378 words,
-each with four sections.
-
-The isolated production build succeeded: 3,383 pages in 26.47 seconds.
-Checked all four touched events against the generated JSON export, both
-articles' rendered source and internal links, and the assigned tag routes and
-tag-page membership. The temporary `site/` build was deleted after verification;
-the baseline, prior article, source files and build log were retained.
+# Republic of the Congo: institutions, child protection and the 2025 law, 21 October 2026
+
+## Coverage and changes
+
+Added six events: judicial-police drug service (1992), interministerial committee (1994),
+three-city survey (2004), child-protection law (2010), Owando arrests (2024), and the Senate
+vote (April 2025). Added articles for 1994 and 2010 and rewrote the existing 2025 article.
+The country now has ten entries and three articles. The articles have 394, 385 and 393 words,
+four sections each, and links to earlier/later events and the country profile.
+
+Read the current `docs/WRITING.md`, category hierarchy and tag definitions. The 1994, 2010
+and 2025 laws are `other`: the complete immediate predecessor penalties were not recovered,
+so a consistent national tightening/easing has not been proved. The survey is `culture`
+with science tag; the Owando case is enforcement without a court tag; the Senate stage is
+`debate`. Every added/edited event has tags. Added colonial tags to the two older entries
+without changing their underlying facts or score vectors.
+
+Corrected the profile's omission of **fine-only alternatives** in possession, cultivation,
+sharing and consumption, supplied concrete pre-2025 enforcement evidence, and added foreigner
+expulsion and sentence-execution restrictions. Preserved six current scores, recreational/
+medical categories and all planting, club and visitor status values. These inherited scores
+were **not newly validated**. Unrelated staged/unstaged work, including chart/layout/styles
+and source-archive edits, was left untouched.
+
+## Primary government report, published in 2010
+
+https://www.sgg.cg/JO/2010/congo-jo-2010-03-sp.pdf
+
+Downloaded the full official **special edition 3 of 10 November 2010**; extracted/read the
+complete drug-policy section, printed pp. 75–76; visually inspected page 76. The same report
+was later circulated as CRC/C/COG/2-4, submitted 11 November 2010 and circulated 18 September
+2012. The local gazette is the retained source. An attempted UN PDF download returned an
+empty file; no successful PDF retrieval from that URL is claimed.
+
+The report provides retrospective institutional dates:
+
+- Judicial-police drug service created in **1992**, staffed by **two officers at the time of
+  the report**, not necessarily two at creation. It updated a register of drug users and
+  their addresses between **1998 and 2003** and lacked operational resources.
+- Interministerial technical committee created by **94-578 of 25 October 1994**. Objectives:
+  prevention, care, social integration, information and research; support government decisions.
+  In 2010 it faced major operating difficulties, the national anti-drug project was no longer
+  operational, and police/customs lacked training/detection equipment. The report calls for
+  reactivation and stronger capacity. The original 1994 decree was not recovered; event date
+  and remit rely on the government's full later report, not an asserted reading of the decree.
+- **2004 survey** in **Brazzaville, Dolisie and Ouesso**, **239 people** encountered through
… 161 more lines
docs/research/history-djibouti-gap-2026-10-21.md +235 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+# Djibouti: colonial controls, criminal law and national institutions, 21 October 2026
+
+## Coverage and corrections
+
+Country coverage grew from four events/no articles to eleven events/three articles. Replaced
+`djibouti-drug-law-1996` with `djibouti-penal-code-1995`, dated **16 April 1995**, and added
+seven events: 1932 colonial controls, the local 1971 publication of France's drug law, a July
+1971 cannabis conviction, the 1984 pardon exclusion, national treaty approval in 1992, the
+2000 coordination committee and the 2003 free-zone exclusion. No incoming repository links
+or article referred to the removed ID. The false law is not retained as a cannabis event.
+
+New articles cover 1932, 1971 and 1995, within 350–500 words, four sections each and links to
+country and earlier/later events. Re-read the current writing and category instructions.
+Every added/rewritten event has validated topic tags. The existing 2026 Balbala event now
+has enforcement/trafficking tags and an additional primary public-broadcaster source; its
+custody wording follows that source rather than asserting judicial pretrial detention.
+
+The profile now incorporates **general sentencing discretion**, separates statutory ceilings
+from mandatory sentences, supplies actual recent enforcement evidence and describes the
+foreign-exclusion clause's restricted scope. Scores and country/status fields are unchanged.
+Unrelated staged and unstaged work, including source-archive updates, was preserved.
+
+## The supposed 1996 drug law was a biodiversity ratification
+
+The old entry attributed drug offences to **113/AN/96**. The official text is instead a
+ratification of the Convention on Biological Diversity, dated **3 September 1996**:
+https://www.journalofficiel.dj/texte-juridique/loi-n113-an-96-3e-l-portant-ratification-de-la-convention-sur-la-diversite-biologique/
+
+Read the complete primary text and corroborating September 1996 journal contents. It has
+no drug offences or five-year personal-use provision. A commercial cannabis-law site repeats
+the same false identification; it is not independent evidence.
+
+## Colonial controls: full official 1932 text
+
+Read the complete official electronic reproduction, including the replacement table:
+https://www.journalofficiel.dj/texte-juridique/arrete-n-18-427-1932-commerce-detention-et-vente-des-substances-veneneuses-a-la-cote-francaise-des-somalis/
+
+The portal labels the page an arrêté, but the reproduced text is the **presidential decree
+of 25 May 1932**, signed Albert Lebrun and colonies minister de Chappedelaine. A separate
+local promulgation, dated **16 June 1932**, signed acting governor Antonin, identifies the
+same decree:
+https://www.journalofficiel.dj/arabe/texte-juridique/arrete-n-17-427-1932-promulquant-a-la-cote-francaise-des-somalis-le-decret-du-25-mai-1932-modifiant-les-dispositions-du-titre-ii-du-decret-du-26-fevrier-1923-reglementant-le-commerce-la-det/
+
+Both appear in local journal **427 of 30 June 1932**. The history entry uses the local
+promulgation date, without claiming an independently established commencement calculation.
+The local order has an isolated 1925 reference where its heading/preamble and the decree
+itself give 1923; do not silently treat that isolated typo as a different predecessor law.
+
+- Preamble cites **22 December 1916** extension of France's 12 July 1916 poisonous-substances
+  law and **26 February 1923** local regulations. Those original instruments were not
+  recovered in full. They are background evidence, not a verified first cannabis ban date.
+- New Articles 30–31 apply permit controls to manufacturing, extraction, preparation,
+  possession, offer, distribution, brokerage, buying, selling, imports/exports and industry.
+  Governor permits are personal, with hygiene-council advice; a trafficking conviction
+  prevents grant/continuation. Permits identify substances and industrial annual quantities.
+- Registration of a public pharmacist's diploma serves as permission for preparation and
+  dispensing in that pharmacy. Unauthorised purchasers need a therapeutic prescription;
+  hospitals and laboratories have special supply arrangements. No claim of actual cannabis
+  prescribing or patient numbers is made.
+- Article 32 requires per-operation import/export permissions; export certificates retained
+  three years. Article 33 requires labelling and locked storage except coca leaves, with
+  seizure of quantities outside storage; regulates postal shipments with professional
+  exceptions. Articles 34–36 require purchase/transfer records, including gifts; retain ten
+  years. Articles 38–39 regulate renewals and specified prescriptions exceeding seven days.
+- Article 2's replacement Table B explicitly lists **Indian hemp, resin, resin preparations,
+  extract and tincture**. This is direct local cannabis-classification evidence.
+- Transitional Article 4 grants six months from publication for certain new obligations
+  under Articles 31, 33 and 34. Do not generalise it into six months' freedom for all cannabis
+  activity. The text contains several typographical errors, including 1932 in a 1923 cross-reference.
+
+Category `other`: earlier restrictions demonstrably existed, but full 1923 terms/old table
+are missing. A new first ban or an across-the-board tightening/easing is not proved.
+The inherited 1900–1920 first-ban estimate remains an unverified legacy scoring anchor;
+replacing it requires the original 1916/1923 controls and their cannabis schedules.
+
+## French law locally published in February 1971
+
+Read complete official electronic reproduction:
+https://www.journalofficiel.dj/arabe/texte-juridique/loi-n-70-1320-relative-aux-mesures-sanitaires-de-lutte-contre-la-toxicomanie-et-a-la-repression-du-trafie-et-de-lusage-illicite-des-substances-veneneuses-j-o-r-f-du-3-1-1971-p-74/
+
+French Law **70-1320 of 31 December 1970**, national JORF 3 January 1971, appears in local
+journal **3 of 10 February 1971**. The event explicitly describes local publication, not
+signing the French law on 10 February or a separately proved day of local commencement.
+
+Article 4 expressly applies Article 2's criminal/therapeutic rules to overseas territories
+and leaves treatment arrangements in specified territories, including the French Territory
+of the Afars and Issas, to local assemblies. No evidence of a working local treatment
+service or a particular local treatment deliberation was recovered.
+
+- L627: ordinary trafficking **2–10 years OR fine OR both**; production/manufacture/import/
+  export prison range **10–20 years**; facilitation and false-prescription offences.
+- L628: illicit use **2 months–1 year OR fine OR both**. The local transcription is damaged
+  in the fine-only wording, but retains the alternative; later French primary case law also
+  quotes the same use/fine-only structure. No later French fine amounts are imported into
+  the 1971 local event. Monetary values are omitted because colonial currency application
+  was not independently reconstructed.
+- L628-1: prosecutorial treatment/medical supervision, successful completion preventing
+  prosecution under its conditions. First-offence provisions and discretion for repetition
+  matter; it is not a universal repeat-offender immunity.
+- L628-2 onwards: court-ordered care, sanctions for evasion, and other treatment rules.
+- Foreign-exclusion and doubled repeat penalties are described at their historical scope.
+
+Original French law landing page (scanned issue link):
+https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000000321402/
+
+Parallel primary judicial quotation of L628's 2-month–1-year/fine/either structure:
+https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000007063047
+(14 November 1988; later French fine wording is not used as a 1971 local amount).
+
+Category `other`: the full prior local criminal scheme was not recovered, so no invented
+whole-point direction is assigned from the later national ceiling alone.
+
+## A named cannabis conviction and later pardon exclusion
+
+https://www.journalofficiel.dj/arabe/?p=110055
+
+Read complete order **72-295 of 24 February 1972**, local journal 5 of 10 March. It identifies
+**Mohamed Aden Darar**, born around 1950 in Djibouti, convicted **29 July 1971** of cannabis
+possession and sale: **six months and a three-year residence ban**. Detained 10 July 1971,
+released 10 January 1972. The order bars residence in Djibouti district and the Obock and
+Tadjourah circles. No weight, personal-use intent or named sentencing statute is supplied;
+none is invented. The entry is a court/sentencing/enforcement event dated to conviction,
+not a new national cannabis ban or an assumption about all users.
+
+https://www.journalofficiel.dj/texte-juridique/decret-n84-123-pre-portant-mesure-de-graces-collectives-collectives/
+
+Read complete decree **84-123**, dated **13 November 1984**, journal of 15 December.
+Article 1 remits eligible firm sentences of eight months or less for offences before
+15 October 1984; Article 2(d) excludes convictions under public-health-code L626–L630-2
+as drafted by the French 1970 law. Article 4 marks the Islamic New Year and makes it
+immediately enforceable. No number of people excluded is stated. This supports continued
+reference to French legislation after independence; it does not prove every 1970 clause
+survived unchanged until 1995. Category `other`, tags amnesty/sentencing: a legal exclusion
+from a new pardon, without an adult-cannabis score change.
+
+## 1992 national treaty approval and 2000 coordination
+
+Full official texts read and retained locally:
+
+- https://www.journalofficiel.dj/texte-juridique/loi-n199-an-92-2el-portant-adhesion-de-la-republique-de-djibouti-aux-conventions-sur-les-stupefiants-et-substances-psychotropes-et-contre-le-trafic-illicite-des-stupefiants/
+  National approval dated **14 April 1992**, journal 15 April, signed **Hassan Gouled Aptidon**.
+  Article 1 covers 1961/1971 conventions, 1972 protocol and trafficking convention. Its
+  transcription gives a malformed 1989 date for the latter; no false international
+  convention date is repeated. National approval is distinct from the UN accessions in
+  the existing **22 February 2001** treaty entry. Category international, tag ratification.
+- https://www.journalofficiel.dj/texte-juridique/decret-n2000-0027-pr-mjslt-portant-creation-dun-comite-national-de-lutte-contre-les-drogues/
+  **3 February 2000**, journal 15 February, signed **Ismaïl Omar Guelleh**. Preamble cites
+  **9–11 February 1999 youth colloquium** and a 1992 national accession instrument.
+  Prime minister chairs; youth minister is vice-chair. Articles 2–5 cover prevention,
+  awareness, coordination, supply/demand monitoring, data collection/archive/dissemination;
+  justice, interior, health, education, defence, police, gendarmerie and anti-drug office
+  representation. No demonstrated programme outcomes are inferred. Category other.
+
+## 1995 Penal Code: read general sentencing rules with drug offences
+
+Complete 130-page copy downloaded; relevant sections read and PDF pages **17–18 and 79–80**
+visually inspected:
+https://www.vertic.org/media/National%20Legislation/Djibouti/DJ_Code_Penal.pdf
+
… 77 more lines
docs/research/history-gambia-gap-2026-10-21.md +197 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+# Gambia: enacted penalties and gaps in the modern timeline
+
+Research and edits: 21 October 2026. Current writing rules, maintenance
+rules, categories and tags were read. Baselines are retained in
+`tmp/history-gambia-gap-2026-10-21/changes-before.yaml` and
+`profile-before.yaml`. Preserve unrelated staged edits.
+
+## Important correction: the 2014 enacted scale differs from news reports
+
+Recovered the **complete four-page enacted amendment**, Act 9/2014, from
+the government's security-legislation archive. Read all four pages using
+local Vision OCR, then visually checked PDF pp. **2–3**, containing the
+complete scale and certification. This is the printed enacted text,
+not an August bill summary. Assent/bracket date **9 October 2014**;
+Gazette supplement **16 October**; parliamentary passage **25 August**.
+
+For first-time cannabis possession, section 5 inserts a new section 35(2):
+
+| Quantity, literally printed | Fine (GMD) | Prison |
+|---|---|---|
+| 0.1–150 g | 50,000–100,000 | **1–2 years** |
+| 151–500 g | 100,000–150,000 | **2–5 years** |
+| 501 g and above | 150,000–250,000 | **3–10 years** |
+
+**Each band allows a fine OR prison OR both.** Do not publish the former
+six-month–one-year / one–two-year / two–three-year scale as enacted law.
+Those figures occur in The Point and JollofNews's **27 August 2014** reports
+of passage. Both reports were read in full. They are retained as evidence
+of Ousman Sonko's reasons: reducing youth imprisonment, burdensome fines,
+prison overcrowding and public expense. No explanation for the tariff
+conflict was recovered; the enacted text takes priority. Do not speculate
+that a particular drafting stage or amendment caused the discrepancy.
+No fractional-gap interpretation is invented between the literally printed
+150/151 g and 500/501 g bands.
+
+Official text:
+https://ons.gov.gm/security-legislation/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Drug-Control-Amendment-Act-2014.pdf
+Passage report:
+https://thepoint.gm/africa/gambia/article/penalty-reduced-for-first-time-cannabis-offenders
+Comparison report:
+https://jollofnews.gm/gambia-reduces-penalties-for-cannabis-possession/
+
+The Act also renames the agency, changes Board meeting frequency, extends
+sections 36–41 to “controlled or prohibited” drugs, and adds First Schedule
+references in sections 34, 36, 37, 40 and 41. Cannabis is in the First
+Schedule. Keep the article focused on the first-offender change while
+acknowledging the wider amendments. The event retains easing for its
+separate first-offender scale; do not treat every change in this mixed
+amendment as a lighter penalty.
+
+## Primary 2003/2005 consolidated law
+
+Recovered **90 scanned pages**, *Drug Control Act*, Chapter 13:05,
+**Issue 1/2009**, Act 15/2003 amended by Act 11/2005. Native extraction is
+empty; ran English Vision OCR. Read the commencement, definitions,
+agency-establishment provisions, sections 31–38, 41–44, 69, 139 and
+First Schedule as relevant. Visually checked PDF **29** / printed **31**
+(possession and shared premises) and PDF **35** / printed **37** (quantity
+presumption). This is **not an unamended 2003 original**. Footnoted 2005
+changes are not silently attributed to initial enactment.
+
+https://ons.gov.gm/security-legislation/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/DROG-CONTROL-ACT.pdf
+
+Commencement **3 October 2003**; section 139 expressly repeals Decree
+80/1996 and has transitional prosecution rules. The article dates the
+replacement law, then explicitly labels detailed tariffs as the published
+law incorporating the 2005 amendments. Category other replaces the vague
+unsupported tightening claim because the predecessor's precise penalty
+comparison was not recovered.
+
+Cannabis/resin are prohibited drugs in the First Schedule. Definitions
+cover plant, resin, extracts and tinctures. Section 33 broadly prohibits
+unauthorised production, growing, supply, transport, acquisition, use and
+possession, with tightly limited authorisation for approved persons in
+medical/scientific establishments. These general authorisations do not
… 123 more lines
docs/research/history-liberia-gap-2026-10-21.md +46 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

docs/research/history-mauritania-gap-2026-10-21.md +160 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

docs/research/history-niger-gap-2026-10-21.md +136 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

docs/research/history-puerto-rico-gap-2026-10-21.md +50 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

docs/research/history-seychelles-gap-2026-10-21.md +152 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

docs/research/madagascar-prohibition-duration-2026-10-21.md +104 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

scripts/extract-canada.py +53 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

scripts/extract-cepii.py +38 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

scripts/extract-wastewater.py +36 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

source-archive.json +236 −4

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

src/components/AverageChart.astro +15 −7

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

src/components/HomePage.astro +9 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

src/layouts/Base.astro +1 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

src/lib/facts.js +1 −1

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

src/pages/charts.astro +1308 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

src/pages/sitemap.xml.js +1 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

src/pages/video.astro +1 −1

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

src/styles/global.css +294 −0

Not shown: a picture, a generated file, or past the length shown per change.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.