Cannabis Freedom Index
← History

Culture & science 🇯🇲 Jamaica

Fieldwork records ganja as a work stimulant, not an amotivational drug

Anthropological fieldwork for the 1969–1972 Jamaica Marihuana project found ganja extraordinarily widespread: in one study community, over 60 percent of adult males smoked, and counting teas, tonics, salves and foods, some 65 to 75 percent of the rural lower section used ganja in some form — among the highest rates for any non-deviant population in the Western world.[2] Users almost unanimously held that ganja enhanced manual work, taken in the morning, at breaks or before onerous labour for a burst of energy — a "motivational syndrome" that cast doubt on the universality of the amotivational syndrome described in the literature.[2] The complex ran on small-scale cultivation (about 25 percent of households in a typical community, mostly ten plants for own use), part-time vendors serving trusted networks of ten to twenty clients, and larger herb camps and herb yards; smoking was embedded in adult work circles while tea-drinking spanned all ages and classes.[2] Ganja smoking marked lower-class belonging — adult non-smokers were near-deviant among the rural poor, while the upwardly mobile shed it as a status marker — and users viewed the 1913 laws as class and race legislation; researchers found even heavy smokers no less hard-working and overwhelmingly law-abiding apart from cannabis.[2]

The story · written by muse-spark,

Lambros Comitas’s chapter treats the working-class Jamaican ganja complex as an institution: definable activities, characteristic groupings, and a coalescing corpus of beliefs and values, summarising anthropological material from the Jamaica Marihuana project of the Research Institute for the Study of Man with the University of the West Indies.[1] Its roots lie in the Indian subcontinent, carried by East Indian indentured labourers in the late nineteenth century; techniques, lexicon and justificatory ideology all support a direct India-to-Jamaica diffusion, though the Indian paternity has been effectively forgotten and some militant Black users now claim Africa as the source.[1]

How many used it

National statistics did not exist, but estimates ran from one-third to two-thirds of the “lower class”.[1] In one of seven study communities, 50 percent of males over fifteen smoked — half of them heavily — with 7.3 percent former smokers and only 20 percent non-smokers; adding half the unclassifiable respondents pushes adult smokers over 60 percent, and with former smokers over 68 percent.[1] Women smoked in lesser numbers, while a larger pool — women, children, smokers and adamant non-smokers alike — drank ganja teas and tonics medicinally or prophylactically, used salves, and occasionally cooked it.[1] Counting every form, Comitas estimated 65 to 75 percent of the rural lower section used ganja somehow — “undoubtedly one of the highest rates of marihuana use for any non-deviant population in the Western world”.[1]

Growing, selling, gathering

Jamaica imported no ganja; it had developed an illegal export trade with North America and Britain, with two harvests a year in most regions.[1] In one typical farming community at least 25 percent of households included someone cultivating, almost always away from the settlement; of 39 known cultivators, 56 percent grew only for personal or household use, 31 percent sold as well, and 13 percent grew primarily commercially — the last group, notably, did not smoke and stood higher socially.[1] The largest planter held some 200 roots; own-use growers planted about ten per season.[1] Theft was the constant risk, and with no recourse to law growers used gossip traps — one man spread word he would plant poison seeds among his crop, and the stealing stopped — or the Pastor-cum-”science man”, whose posted psalm in dove’s blood frightened a thief’s wife into returning half-cured ganja.[1]

Distribution was small illegal individual business: no centralised network operated locally, regionally or island-wide.[1] Sixteen men of 178 in the illustrative community sold in some quantity; none full-time, all combining it with farming or other work, living as quiet upper-working-class “nice guys” who deplored criminality like their respectable neighbours.[1] Each small vendor served ten to twenty trusted clients, with much buying passing through screens of middlemen; larger distributors served 50 to 100 clients from herb camps — the major vendor’s house with beer, dominoes, a record player — or simpler herb yards to smoke in.[1]

Smoke, tea, tonic, poultice

Smoking ran through spliffs of about four inches mixing ganja and tobacco, far more popular than the chillum, which needed gatherings, apparatus and security; among 30 intensively studied smokers, daily use ranged from one to twenty-four spliffs, averaging seven.[1] Tea-drinking was the most prevalent method of all, crossing class lines and recommended especially for infants and children; rum-or-wine tonics, poultices for pain and wounds, topical preparations for neonates, and occasional ganja in soups or with bananas completed the repertoire.[1]

Age patterned everything: childhood teas prescribed intergenerationally in secret; adolescent peer groups from around puberty, some starting at ten, experimenting without buying from adult vendors; adulthood’s small egalitarian circles of workmates where smoking was routine at work parties and evening visits; and old age, where fewer smoked — weak brains, Christian guilt, dead companions, empty pockets.[1]

The work drug

Users distinguished sharply between tea, absorbed into the blood to strengthen it against disease, and smoke, travelling from lungs to brain with unpredictable consequences.[1] Medicinal faith was sweeping — constipation, colds, gonorrhoea, marasmus, arthritis — but one belief stood above the rest: ganja made people work harder, faster and longer.[1] The farmer facing hard land to clear would sit, smoke a spliff, and minutes later face the task; energy use came mornings, at breaks, before onerous labour.[1] Setting objective assessment aside, Comitas argued this work-stimulant belief and the behaviour it induced doubted the universality of Smith’s “amotivational syndrome”: in Jamaica, cannabis looked central to a “motivational syndrome”, letting people face, start and carry through the hardest manual labour, with possible positive social value in smallholder economies under hard ecological conditions.[1]

A class badge

For adolescents smoking proved manhood, a rite of passage in illegality; for the poorest men it signalled camaraderie, equality and trust — a man who joined the smoke could be confided in, while non-smokers, Christians excepted, counted near-deviant loners, sometimes thought simple-minded.[1] Among the rural poor to smoke was to conform; not to smoke risked marginality — the reverse of higher levels.[1] Status climbers shed the marker first: mobiles in the study community, many once committed smokers, were now non-smokers almost to a man.[1] Upper Jamaica blamed ganja for delinquency and crime, fed by newspaper atrocity stories, but the research found smokers similar to non-smokers in every major dimension, the heaviest law-abiding except for cannabis.[1] The 1913 laws looked, in retrospect and to users alike, like class and race legislation rather than medicine — arbitrary, aimed at the labouring masses, feeding conspiratorial views of a government antagonistic to poor people having anything good.[1]

Listed for context. No score change is recorded for Jamaica here.

References

  1. The Social Nexus of Ganja in JamaicaLambros Comitas · In Cannabis and Culture, edited by Vera Rubin · Mouton · 1975 · pp. 119–132 · ISBN 9789027976699
  2. The Social Nexus of Ganja in JamaicaLambros Comitas · In Cannabis and Culture, edited by Vera Rubin · Mouton · 1975 · Entire chapter, printed pp. 119–132; Indian paternity, prevalence estimates, cultivation, distribution and herb camps, consumption methods, age groupings, work-enhancement beliefs vs amotivational syndrome, class marker and 1913 laws

Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.