The story · written by gpt-6,
Growers and people holding cannabis faced criminal offences under Sierra Leone’s colonial drug law, while medicinal preparations followed a separate regulated route.[1] Adopted in 1926 to implement the Geneva Opium Convention, the law covered both the Colony and the Protectorate.[1] Its later revised edition shows the system that growers, traders and chemists faced.[1]
Diamba was already part of local life
Cannabis had been described in Sierra Leone in 1851, when colonial surgeon R. O. Clarke wrote about diamba cultivation and smoking.[2] The local plant had a history well before international controls arrived.[2]
Yet knowledge of it was uneven.[2] Historian Chris Duvall recounts how the president of Sierra Leone’s Chamber of Commerce told an inquiry in 1899 that there was nothing resembling bhang or Indian hemp in the colony.[2] The international names could obscure a plant already known to local growers and smokers.[2]
The law reached plants as well as resin
The 1925 Geneva convention provided the stated reason for the ordinance.[1] Its definition of Indian hemp described dried flowering or fruiting tops of female cannabis plants whose resin had not been removed, whatever commercial name they carried.[1]
The revised law’s offences reached further.[1] Growing the plant, possessing it or any part of it, and selling or otherwise dealing in it were offences, with an exception for medical preparations.[1] Separate rules prohibited importing or exporting cannabis resin and made producing, holding or dealing in resin offences.[1] The controls therefore reached farmers, holders and traders along the supply chain.[1]
Medicines followed pharmacy rules
Medicinal extracts and tinctures came under another part of the law.[1] Their imports and exports required licences.[1] The governor could regulate manufacture, possession and distribution, including prescriptions and the records kept by people making or supplying the drugs.[1]
Qualified sellers of poisons had a route to prepare and dispense these medicines within their pharmacy businesses.[1] That professional channel sat alongside the offences covering the plant and its resin.[1]
Officials eventually named the local drug
In 1933, an official drug report identified diamba as Cannabis sativa and described it as the colony’s only known illegally used dangerous drug.[2] The report connected local use with the vocabulary of international drug control.[2]
The colonial law remained important long afterwards.[3] Sierra Leone’s 2008 drug law repealed it, created a national enforcement agency and gave officers specific powers to destroy cannabis crops.[3] Control in Sierra Leone had developed from a colonial treaty law into a national enforcement system.[3]
Score by segment 0 to 10
- Possession · 25%10 → 0−10
- Personal cultivation · 25%10 → 0−10
- Punishment & enforcement · 20%10 → 1−9
- Sharing & gifting · 10%10 → 0−10
- Consumption · 10%10 → 1−9
- Legal access · 10%10 → 0−10
The bar shows the score after the change; the tick marks where it stood before. Sierra Leone's scores have changed again since.
References
- Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Chapter 154, revised textGovernment of Sierra Leone · pp. 1619–1623, sections 1–2 and 9–13; 1926 ordinance with amendments of 1928 and 1932 listedarchived
- The African Roots of MarijuanaChris S. Duvall · Duke University Press · 2019 · p. 191; chapter 9 notes 47–53, pp. 316–317 · ISBN 9781478004530
- National Drugs Control Act, 2008, No. 10Government of Sierra Leone · 2008 · Sections 2–3, 43 and 92archived
- The African Roots of MarijuanaChris S. Duvall · Duke University Press · 2019 · p. 191 and chapter 9 notes 51–53, pp. 316–317 · ISBN 9781478004530
Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read. The score before the change is an editorial estimate.