Fill Kyrgyzstan history gaps and correct small-offence profile

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+# Kyrgyzstan: filling the hemp, personal-offence and court-guidance gaps
+
+Reviewed 24 October 2026. Seven new events, three rewritten events, five new
+articles and a revised country profile. The country previously had five history
+entries and no articles. New and revised text uses inline citations and tags.
+
+## Reading and source provenance
+
+Local source files, extracts and verification helpers are retained in
+`tmp/history-kyrgyzstan-gap-2026-10-24/`.
+
+- Read the original 27 October 1934 Soviet decree as reproduced from the 1948
+  collected laws on Istmat: the Indian-hemp restriction, medical/scientific
+  exception, criminal-responsibility/confiscation direction and express
+  commencement from 1935. The first search result used an obsolete certificate
+  hostname; the normal `istmat.org/node/42491` page worked.
+- Downloaded and extracted the Interior Ministry Academy’s 2024 collection.
+  Read Malabaev and Zholdoshbek kyzy Aigerim’s chapter, especially printed
+  pp. 88–90, and visually checked p. 90 against the extraction. The chapter
+  quotes the June 1964 instruction to stop southern Chuy hemp sowing from 1965
+  and describes conversion of farms and research stations. This is an attributed
+  historical account reproducing the operative quotation; the original Soviet
+  decision and local implementing decree were not retrieved. Its unrelated,
+  strongly polemical claims about the 1916 uprising and drug harms are not used.
+- Read Nazaraliev’s organisation’s 15 January 2014 statement, identifying his
+  4 January proposal, and RFE/RL’s 7 January original reporting and interviews.
+  The campaign’s prevalence and therapeutic claims are not adopted as facts.
+- Downloaded AFEW’s original report by Olga Ochneva. HTML metadata establishes
+  **8 February 2018**, so the interview warnings are dated before the reform.
+  Predictions about fines and incarceration are attributed to the interviewees.
+  Aybek is a pseudonym, and the hashish case is the lawyer’s account rather than
+  a court judgment reviewed here.
+- Read the repealed 2017 Code of Misdemeanours reproduced by Aqlex from the
+  justice ministry text: commencement note, articles 42–43, 46, 49 and 123–124.
+  It was introduced on **1 January 2019**. The source is its edition at repeal
+  in 2021, with no amendment note changing the relevant special offences.
+- Read the 2021 commencement law reproduced by CIS Legislation, including
+  article 1, the publication record and fifteen-day commencement clause.
+  New codes began **1 December 2021**, following publication on 16 November.
+- Read the FAOLEX reproduction of the Code of Offences, articles 96–97, and
+  checked the provisions against the later Zakon.kg reproduction of justice
+  ministry text, edition **9 October 2026**. The latter warns of deferred
+  amendments, including one effective 1 November; none was used to backdate
+  a drug penalty. Also read article 127 on public consumption.
+- Downloaded the Criminal Code reproduced by Zakon.kg, edition **24 July 2026**;
+  read articles 282–283, 287–288 and 290 and amendment notes. An earlier English
+  translation hosted by Nottingham was useful for orientation, but current
+  claims follow the later Russian text.
+- Read the complete relevant parts of Law 69/2024 on Aqlex, including articles
+  2, 7, 16–17, 21 and 35. It was published 12 March and began **12 September
+  2024**, six months later. The earlier 1998 law was repealed then.
+- Read Cabinet Resolution 152/2025 and relevant parts of annexes 1–3 on Aqlex.
+  The official ministry registry confirms the document identity but its live
+  page returned only an application shell. The publicly readable mirror supplied
+  statutory text, not its separate AI explanations. The narcotic list and
+  quantity annex incorporate the **14 August 2026** amendment. The cannabis
+  entries and quantity column headings appear before the list page’s truncated
+  final living-organisms section. That final section was not used to invent
+  seed rules or plant-count thresholds.
+- Read the complete Russian text of Supreme Court Plenum resolution 31 of
+  **7 November 2025**, reproduced on Aqlex’s Kyrgyz-language catalogue page.
+  Relevant paragraphs: 5–9, 16–17, 24, 36–40. The ruling says it takes effect
+  after publication on the Supreme Court website; that publication date remains
+  unverified. The event records adoption, not an invented commencement date.
+- Read Kaktus.media’s **20 July 2026** report quoting the Interior Ministry
+  about festival-product samples, searches and three suspects. The precise
+  arrest days and final outcomes were not supplied, so the event is dated to
+  the report and describes an ongoing investigation.
+
+## Corrections and the score timeline
+
+The 1934 event now uses **1935**, the decree’s express commencement year. Its
+title and account identify Indian hemp and the medical/scientific exception.
+Removed the false assertion that Kyrgyzstan was already a Soviet union republic
+in 1934; it was then autonomous within the RSFSR. Its existing unregulated
+`before` vector is unchanged. The old broad allocation of other segment drops
+to this first step still needs reconstruction from Kyrgyz republican codes and
+earlier drug legislation; this pass does not certify that all modern restrictions
+began with the Indian-hemp decree.
+
+The former 2019 description incorrectly presented the **old** first/second/third
+offence sequence from AFEW’s pre-reform interview as the new code’s rules. It
+also omitted the actual misdemeanour code. The corrected event follows articles
+123–124: category-II fine and category-I restriction of liberty are listed for
+small personal possession and small growing. For adults, category-I restriction
+means three to six months with probation reporting and travel conditions. General
+articles 42–43 distinguish these penalties from a criminal record and describe
+the court’s sentencing choices; no claim about a universal sentence imposed in
+practice is made. The article’s descriptions of available restrictions are
+statutory, not an estimate of how often probation was used.
+
+The 2021 replacement code places small possession and small cultivation in the
+administrative offences system. Possession carries a 200-calculated-unit fine
+or 40 hours of community work; an individual’s small grow carries 125 units.
+Large or group cultivation remains criminal under article 288.
+
+Current **cultivation 1→2** corrects the previous blanket criminal classification.
+Possession’s current 3 is retained, but its history now distinguishes the 2019
+penal-misdemeanour period (score 1, including liberty restrictions) from the
+2021 administrative response (score 3). The 2019 `before` snapshot uses the
+former profile vector; the new 2021 `before` changes only possession to 1.
+The reconstructed recent steps are **18→13 in 2019**, then **13→20.5 in 2021**.
+The current exact score is **20.5**, previously 18; the displayed rounded score
+is 21. Other current segment scores and both legal-status labels are preserved.
+In particular, the retained sharing/practice score is not independently verified
+as evidence of present tolerance. The public explanation now states the actual
+gift/supply rule and prison range; further practice evidence remains a task.
+
+The profile’s approximately **5 g** cannabis claim was unsupported and is removed.
+The later quantity annex specifies **up to and including 20 g** dried marijuana
+as small, over 20 through 600 g as large, and over 600 g as especially large.
+Dried resin has 3/90 g boundaries; oil preparation 2/60 g; extracts/tinctures
+3/90 g as dry residue. These are preparation-specific legal bands, not permission
+to possess or supply cannabis. The current table is not backdated as proof that
+the 2025 resolution introduced these exact cannabis amounts or increased a prior
+limit. The partially accessible August 2026 amendment could not establish such
+a comparison.
+
+Medical `none` now has direct statutory support: cannabis preparations appear
+in narcotic list IV, and the law/rules prohibit their ordinary medical use.
+Narrow research and official-use exceptions do not establish patient access.
+The seed exclusions in the cannabis-material definitions replace the earlier
+claim that only an unread list could address seeds. Import, seed trade and the
+complete living-organisms list still require review; seed/cloning statuses are
+not changed. No plant-count limit is invented.
+
+Existing seizure and all-drug prosecution statistics are preserved verbatim,
+including their source lists. They do not prove cannabis-specific arrest totals.
+
+## Remaining historical and legal retrieval tasks
+
+The 1965 crop decision is a valuable gap-filler, but original enactments are still
+needed for exact penalties and a fuller distinction between industrial southern
+Chuy hemp, Indian hemp and other cannabis varieties. Its explicit `unscored`
+reason reflects that limitation and the existing prohibited-growing score level.
+
+The 1974 USSR decree located in this search was a **1991 consolidation** containing
+1982 and 1987 amendments. It was not backdated into a new Kyrgyz event or used
+to claim that small-amount administrative rules existed in the original 1974
+text. A separate lead suggests a Kyrgyz drug-possession decree already existed
+in December 1962; obtain it and the republican code before adding a supposed
+first personal-possession offence in 1974. A KRSU historical-document compilation
+returned 403 and was not treated as read.
+
+Nazaraliev’s 2014 event now concerns his own proposal; the old composite sentence
+combining the 1990s, 2014 and 2017 was removed. The separate pre-existing December
+2024/February 2026 Bekeshev entry was not revised in this pass. It remains a
+candidate for splitting after its original parliamentary sources are retrieved.
+
+The July 2026 case involved multiple product types and a supply investigation.
+Four grams of marijuana and seeds found in one search do not prove that small
+personal possession or seeds alone led to the arrests. No convictions or product
+THC percentages are supplied. The profile avoids presenting the report as a new
+law or as a general ban on every hemp-labelled food.
+
+## Verification
+
+Batch checks validate unique IDs, categories, tags, title length, related links,
+inline citation coverage, each article’s 350–500 words and four headings, and
… 11 more lines