docs/research/history-tuvalu-gap-2026-10-23.md +106 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+# Tuvalu: an earlier fine increase, youth reporting and the 2025 penalties
+
+Researched 23 October 2026. Two new entries extend Tuvalu's timeline from two events to four.
+The existing 1948 and 2025 entries are revised with inline sources, tags and related links.
+The existing article is rewritten to explain the 2025 penalties and licensing power with inline citations. All fourteen existing profile
+text blocks now have inline citations; six numeric scores and every classification are preserved.
+
+## Earlier fine amendment and conflicting dates
+
+The original Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2009, Act 4 of 2009, was downloaded
+and read in full. Section 5 and Schedule 2 replace $2,000 with $4,000 in the Dangerous Drugs
+Act's section 39(2)(a). This is the general High Court penalty clause where no specific penalty
+is provided, not a cannabis-specific possession tariff. The later consolidated Act pairs the
+$4,000 fine with ten years' imprisonment; it also contains a separate summary penalty.
+No inference about sentences actually imposed is made.
+
+The original amendment's title and number say 2009, but its first page expressly prints
+Parliament's enactment as **3 July 2010** and commencement as **6 July 2010**. Both extracted
+text and a rendered image confirm the year. The current catalogue and the 2022 drug-law
+endnote instead give 6 July **2009**. The event uses **2010-07-06**, the commencement printed
+on the original amendment. This conflict needs archival gazette or parliamentary confirmation;
+the later footnote is not silently substituted for the original. Its source locator states
+the conflict. The fine increase is unscored: monetary severity changes inside an existing
+prison-backed offence do not justify a separate whole point in the six-segment index.
+
+## Government report: scope and date
+
+Tuvalu's initial child-rights report CRC/C/TUV/1 is dated **16 February 2012** and was
+circulated by the UN on **10 October 2012**. The event uses the report date, not the later
+circulation date. The full relevant sections (paragraphs 342–346 and 359), cover and context
+were read from the official PDF. It cites a **2006** behavioural survey of people aged
+**15–24 in Funafuti**, of whom 5% reported marijuana use. This is neither current national
+prevalence nor a statistic confined to under-18s. The original survey was not independently
+recovered, so the event says the government report cited it.
+
+The report also describes marijuana imports from Fiji, border-control concerns and youth
+programmes addressing alcohol and drugs. Its phrase about three cases involving police is
+ambiguous about the nature of their involvement; no claim of three police officers being
+arrested or convicted is made. The event omits that count. Paragraph 359 identifies updating
+drug laws and coordinated programming as priorities. The report's policy description that
+illicit use was not directly regulated is not applied as current law after the 2025 amendment.
+The report is context, without a score change.
+
+## Colonial continuity and present legislation
+
+The complete relevant 2022 Revised Edition of the Dangerous Drugs Act was read, including
+commencement, definitions, sections 4–10, the medical-drug chapter, penalties and endnotes.
+It confirms **20 October 1948** commencement and lists numerous later amendments. The 1948
+entry now explicitly distinguishes the inherited ordinance from its later consolidated controls;
+no current fine or 2025 penalty is backdated to 1948. Its existing first-ban score vector stays.
+Cannabis covers either Cannabis sativa or Cannabis indica, or any portion of the plant;
+extracts and tinctures also appear separately in Schedule 2.
+
+The 2025 amendment was read directly, including all relevant operative sections, application
+form and the complete cannabis rows of Schedule 3. The penalty table was visually inspected.
+The official catalogue's existing verified **3 July 2025** commencement remains, consistent
+with the Act's commencement-on-publication rule. Its text gives the smallest smoking or
+possession band two to five years, and up to one plant one to five years. These are statutory
+minimums and maximums, not an assertion of observed routine sentencing.
+
+The printed table overlaps its 'not exceeding' rows and leaves amounts over 10 g through
+50 g without a separate smoking/possession row, and four or five cannabis plants without
+a separate growing row. The article and profile state those structural facts. They do not
+interpolate thresholds, infer which overlapping penalty takes precedence or invent a tariff
+for omitted quantities. The law also adds medical/scientific licensing, with application,
+record, security and reporting conditions. An issued licence or operating patient service
+was not verified, so the existing **limited** medical label and access score 0 remain.
+
+The Traffic Act's relevant sections 23 and 25 were independently downloaded and read before
+rewriting the driving block. Impairment by a drug is the offence trigger; the separate 0.08%
+figure concerns alcohol, not THC. The actual penalty and potential disqualification are cited.
+All planting, clubs, visitors and driving status fields match the baseline. No optional context
+section is added merely to repeat a source.
+
+## Rejected lead and retained evidence
+
+The catalogue's 2024 List of Prohibited Imports Regulations was retrieved and read. Its actual
+subject is motorcycles, engines and parts, not cannabis. It therefore produces no cannabis event.
+Earlier amendment numbers listed in the consolidated law remain retrieval leads; a number in
+an endnote alone is not enough to describe a cannabis change.
+
+Downloads, extracted text, inspected images, baseline snapshots, batch scripts and logs remain
+in `tmp/history-tuvalu-gap-2026-10-23/`. The earlier catalogue snapshot is retained in
+`tmp/research-progress-2026-10-15/tv-index.html`. Sources are official statutes and the actual
+state report, not commercial travel pages with unsupported claims about a 1990 drug Act.
+
+## Verification
+
+The scoped verifier checks all four touched events, valid tags/categories, titles, related IDs,
+source use and citation keys. The article has four headings, country/history links and the
+required length. Fourteen profile blocks pass inline-key validation. All score vectors and
+classification fields match their baseline, and the Tuvalu score chain has no flagged steps.
+Build and rendered-export checks are recorded below. Temporary site output is deleted once
+verification is complete; research evidence remains.
+
+The full build passed: **3,834 pages in 35.96 seconds**. All **70 rendered citation links**
+on the four touched history pages and country profile resolve to unique, consecutive targets.
+Seven relevant tag pages and internal history links exist. History JSON/CSV include both new
+events with no raw citation marks. The profile API has six segments and eight populated context
+blocks; its final timeline score matches the exported exact score **5.5** (rounded 6). All six
+exported segment values match the baseline. Medical remains Limited. Home, comparison and score
+exports contain no raw citation marks. The revised article is 390 words with four headings.
+Scoped checks, the score chain and `git diff --check` passed.
+
+Deleted `tmp/history-tuvalu-gap-2026-10-23/site/` after verification. Source documents, texts,
+inspected images, snapshots, scripts and build log remain.