Cannabis Freedom Index
← History

Ban 🇧🇷 Brazil

Rio de Janeiro's council bans pito de pango

Rio de Janeiro’s municipal council prohibited selling and using pito de pango and keeping it on public premises. Sellers faced a fine of 20 milreis; the custodial provision explicitly mentioned enslaved people and other users. França quotes eight days’ imprisonment, while the account of Avelar’s research distinguishes three days in 1830 from eight in 1854. Original code editions remain to be compared; this was a municipal measure, not a national ban.[1][2][3]

The story · written by gpt-6.1-sol,

On 4 October 1830, Rio de Janeiro’s municipal council prohibited the sale and use of pito de pango. The ordinance was local, unevenly documented and of uncertain enforcement, but it became an early marker in the long history of cannabis prohibition in Brazil.

What the ordinance prohibited

The rule appeared among municipal provisions regulating goods, medicines and apothecaries. It forbade selling or using pito de pango and keeping it in public premises. The term referred both to cannabis and to the pipe in which it was smoked.

The penalties treated sellers and users differently. A seller faced a fine of 20 milreis. An enslaved person or anyone else found using it faced eight days in jail, in the code as quoted by historian Jean Marcel Carvalho França. A competing account gives three days in 1830 and an increase to eight in 1854. The language singled out enslaved people even while formally extending the punishment to other users.

The distinction may reflect different versions of the municipal code. Francisco Camargo’s 2014 report of Lucas Avelar’s research explicitly separates the 1830 and 1854 penalties. Until the relevant original code editions are compared, eight days should remain attributed to França rather than presented as an independently verified 1830 tariff.

Cannabis and racial control

França places cannabis consumption among enslaved Africans, their descendants and poorer communities, and discusses names including fumo de Angola, diamba, liamba and pango. The surviving records often come from people condemning the practice rather than from the consumers themselves.

The ordinance emerged in a slaveholding city and directed its custodial penalty explicitly at “slaves and other persons.” The Brazilian Institute of Criminal Sciences describes it as a municipal measure rather than part of a national drug-law system. Brazil’s imperial criminal code, adopted later in 1830, did not itself establish a comprehensive drug prohibition.

A pattern spreads between cities

França describes comparable directives in Santos in 1870 and Campinas in 1876. The surviving record does not establish how consistently these rules were enforced.

This patchwork remained different from a nationwide ban. Brazil did not place cannabis under federal prohibition until 1932, more than a century after Rio’s ordinance.

Why the index did not move

The 1830 entry does not change Brazil’s score. The Cannabis Freedom Index measures the law across the whole country, while this was a rule of one municipal council. It remains in the history because it records an unusually early prohibition and the local, racialised path by which cannabis control began to develop.[1][2][3]

Listed for context. No score change is recorded for Brazil here.

References

  1. História da maconha no BrasilJean Marcel Carvalho França · Editora Jandaíra · 2022 · Chapter 2, O vício dos pretos?, municipal prohibitions and note 15 · ISBN 9786550940133
  2. Maurides de Melo Ribeiro — A evolução histórica da política criminal e da legislação brasileira sobre drogas2016 · IBCCRIM Boletim 286, September 2016; opening historical discussionarchived
  3. Francisco Camargo — Pito do pango?2014 · 13 November 2014; reports Lucas Avelar’s distinction between the 1830 and 1854 codesarchived

Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.