Cannabis Freedom Index

Changelog eb87435

Extend Marshall Islands history and verify drug-law amendment dates

4 history entries added2 history entries edited1 country profile edited1 article written2 articles edited1 file of code, design or docs +404 −130 lines

History changes.yaml

Added 4

Edited 2

Marshall Islands requires reports of witnessed drug activity

date

2025-10-06

title

Marshall Islands adds a duty to reportrequires reports of witnessed drug activity

description

Public Law 2025-37 added section 912A to the Prohibited Drugs Act. Anyone who witnesses drug activityactivities involving drugs must report itthem to national or local police; failing under an amendment effective on 6 October 2025. Failure to report can bringcarries a $1,000 fine, while good-faith reportsreporters receive confidentiality and protection from civil or criminal liability.[@1] The amendment also expressly added marijuana and marijuana concentrate to the definition of a prohibited drug.[@1]

sources

Marshall Islands — Prohibited Drugs (Prohibition and Control) (Amendment) Act 2025 Marshall Islands Parliament — Prohibited Drugs (Prohibition and Control) Act 1987, consolidated through P.L. 2025-37

tags

police-powers, enforcement

unscored

The reporting duty concerns witnesses, and the express definition addition is not evidence of a new whole-point change to the existing ordinary cannabis penalties.

related

marshall-islands-drug-asset-seizure-2020, marshall-islands-student-cannabis-survey-2022

Marshall Islands prohibits cannabis under its national narcotics law

title

The Marshall Islands pass theirprohibits cannabis under its national narcotics actlaw

description

The act commencednational narcotics law took effect on 20 March 1987. It and prohibited cannabis possession, cultivation and distribution, with specified professional and medical and professional exceptions. The current consolidation[@1] In an early prosecution under that law, renamed the Prohibited Drugs Act in 2020, gives marijuana a penalty ladder and retains prescription exceptionsman received two years for marijuana possession; it does not by itself verify an operating patient servicethe Supreme Court later overturned the conviction because his right to a lawyer had been denied.[@2]

sources

Marshall Islands Supreme Court — Republic v Sakaio, 18 October 1989 Wikipedia — Cannabis in the Marshall Islands 1 unchanged

tags

home-growing, trade, sentencing

related

marshall-islands-sakaio-counsel-1989, marshall-islands-drug-asset-seizure-2020

Countries and states 1 file

Marshall Islands countries/mh.yaml

medical

nonelimited

summary

A first offence with an ounceCannabis offences carry fines or less carries a $1prison,000–5,000 fine or six months to a year with higher penalties for larger amounts and repeat convictions.

segments › possession › text

Illegal under the Narcotic Drugs (Prohibition and Control) Act 1987. AFor a first marijuana offence involving one ounce or less carries, the statutory range is a fine of $1,000–5,000 fine or six months to aone year in prison, or both; more. More than an ounce on a first offence, or an ounce or less after a previous conviction, carries $5,000–25,000 or one to five years, or both. Penalties rise steeply for repeat offences.[@law]

segments › possession › sources

wiki, law

segments › cultivation › text

Section 903(b) prohibits knowinglyKnowingly planting or cultivating a prohibited drug is an offence. Section 902Marijuana includes growing cannabis plants, seeds and growing plants in marijuanaresin; the law provides no ordinary personal plant allowance.[@law]

segments › enforcement › text

Under the 1987 ActThe law allows a first offence involving one ouncefine, imprisonment or less carriesboth for the smallest first marijuana offences.[@law] A January 2020 newspaper report described a fine of at leastsix-month suspended sentence and a $1,000 or at least six months in prisonfine for a personal marijuana import.[@journal] The minimum fine alone is large relative2025 amendment also requires witnesses to local incomesreport drug activity, and prison is an option even forwith a first small offence$1,000 fine for failing to do so.[@reporting]

segments › enforcement › sources

law, journal, reporting

segments › sharing › text

Distribution includes giving, transferring and, delivering to another, bartering and exchanging drugs. The general marijuanaMarijuana offences follow the quantity and conviction-history penalty ladder in section 909 applies; an unpaid transfer is not a separate legal route, with additional penalties for supplying someone under eighteen.[@law]

segments › consumption › text

Section 903(c) prohibits selfSelf-administration except as the Act permits. Consumption is therefore expressly coveredprohibited outside the law’s exceptions.[@law] In a March–May 2022 high school survey, rather than merely inferred from possession13.8% of participants reported marijuana use in the preceding thirty days.[@survey]

segments › consumption › sources

law, survey

segments › access › text

No recreational route. Sections 904–907 allowThe law permits specified professional handling and possession under a valid medical prescription exceptions; their existence does not establish. Licensed practitioners obtain drugs through the government, which is the sole importer and distributor for that cannabis medicines are supplied in practicechannel.[@law]

context › production › text

NonePlanting, cultivation, production and manufacture are prohibited outside the Act’s exceptions. Practitioners handling drugs for professional work, approved research, teaching or analysis require licences specifying the drug and quantity.[@law]

context › production › sources

wikilaw

context › products › text

NoneThe law separates marijuana from marijuana concentrate, including hashish and THC, with different penalty bands. Both are expressly included in the current prohibited-drug definition.[@law]

context › products › sources

wikilaw

context › medical › text

Sections 904–907 provide prescriptionThe Act expressly extends its medical and professional-use exceptions, with to marijuana and concentrates. It recognises licensed professional handling and possession under a valid prescription. Practitioner licences specifyingidentify the drugs and exact quantities and last one year; receipt and dispensing records must be retained for two years. Actual cannabis-medicine availability was not established.[@law]

context › consequences › text

Sections 909–910 provide confiscation and forfeitureDrugs may be confiscated, includingand property used in an offencedrug transport, with procedures for innocent ownership claimsimport or export can be seized and forfeited. Owners have one month to seek recovery through the High Court.[@law] The 2020 amendment expressly added cash to seizure powers.[@amendment]

context › consequences › sources

law, amendment

context › clubs › text

NoOrdinary cannabis clubs are knowncultivation and distribution, including gifts and the law leaves no room for them: growing cannabis and supplying it to another persontransfers, are both prohibited. The Act’s exceptions concern licensed professional or prescribed medical handling.[@law]

context › clubs › sources

wikilaw

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreational supply for anyone. British travel advice says thereImporting and possessing cannabis are severe penalties for all drug offencesprohibited outside the Act’s specified exceptions. A small first marijuana offence can bring a fine, including long prison sentencesimprisonment or both, and heavy fineslarger quantities or previous convictions raise the penalty range.[@law]

context › visitors › sources

wiki, fcdolaw

context › planting › text

Section 902Marijuana includes seeds and any part of a growing cannabis plant, growing or otherwise. Section 903The Act prohibits possession, planting, cultivation and distribution outside the Act’sits specified exceptions; no personal seed or cutting exemption was identified.[@law]

sources

Marshall Islands — Prohibited Drugs (Prohibition and Control) (Amendment) Act 2020 Marshall Islands — Prohibited Drugs (Prohibition and Control) (Amendment) Act 2025 Marshall Islands Journal — Gandhi fined $1,000 for marijuana import, 3 January 2020 Marshall Islands Ministry of Health and Human Services — Rapid High School Survey 2022 GOV.UK (FCDO) — Foreign travel advice: Marshall Islands, safety and security Wikipedia — Cannabis in the Marshall Islands 1 unchanged

Articles and atlas entries 3

marshall-islands-drug-reporting-duty-2025 articles/marshall-islands-drug-reporting-duty-2025.md

text

A 2025 amendment People who witness activities involving drugs must report them to thenational or local police under a Marshall Islands' principal drug statute added an unusually broad public reporting rule amendment effective from 6 October 2025. It does not legalise or reclassify cannabis; it requires witnessesFailing to notify the police about drug activityreport carries a $1,000 fine. ## A new section in an old act The Prohibited Drugs (Prohibitionsame law promises confidentiality and Control) Act beganprotection from civil or criminal penalties for reports made in 1987 and has since been amended several timesgood faith. Its current official consolidation identifies Public Law 2025-37 as[@1] ## The obligation reaches people who witness drug activity The reporting rule creates a duty for witnesses alongside the source of new section 912A, headed “Reportingexisting offences for handling drugs. It directs information to either national or local police and Obligationsattaches a financial penalty to non-compliance.” The consolidated document does not give Good faith is the amendment'condition attached to the reporter’s exact enactment dayprotection from liability.[@1] For someone witnessing activity, so the history entry records only 2025amendment therefore sets out both an obligation to report and safeguards for supplying the information. It also does not reproduce a separate statementIts confidentiality clause guarantees protection of legislative purpose. What can be established directly is the dutyinformation given under the amendment insertedreporting requirement.[@1] ## Everyone who witnesses activity Section 912A says any person who has witnessed activities involving drugs is obligatedCannabis was expressly added to report them to national or local police. the drug definition The language does not limitamendment also inserted marijuana and marijuana concentrate into the duty to professionals, public officials, serious trafficking, or a specified listdefinition of controlled substancesa prohibited drug. Failure It referred back to comply is an offence punishable by a $1their existing definitions elsewhere in the Act,000 fine which distinguish ordinary marijuana from concentrates such as hashish and THC. The section contains no prison term for [@1,3] This followed [the reporting offence2020 revision](/history/marshall-islands-drug-asset-seizure-2020/), which renamed the narcotics law, expressly covered methamphetamine, MDMA and does not define a separate penalty accordingsynthetic cathinones, and expanded seizure powers to the quantity or kind of include cash. The new 2025 wording placed cannabis and concentrates expressly within that revised prohibited-drug witnessedlist.[@1,2] ## Protection for the report The same section saysexisting penalties still depend on quantity and record The consolidated law sets a person who reports information in good faith is not liablefirst marijuana offence involving one ounce or less at a $1,000–5,000 fine, six months to criminalone year in prison, or civil penalties for doing so both. It also guaranteesLarger amounts and previous convictions move the confidentiality of the informationoffence into higher bands. The text does not describe the procedure police must use[@3] Supplying marijuana to receivesomeone under eighteen attracts additional penalties: a report or set out exceptions for family relationships$25, medical confidentiality000–50,000 fine, five to fifteen years in prison, or selfboth. Concentrates have a separate weight-incriminationbased scale with much heavier potential sentences.[@3] The reporting duty sitstherefore operates beside the statute's longstanding cannabis prohibitions andsubstantial penalties for the drug activity itself. Those remain described inIts $1,000 fine applies to a person who fails to meet the article on the witness-reporting requirement.[1987 Prohibited Drugs Act@1,3] ## School survey evidence supplied another view of cannabis use A [2022 high school survey](/history/marshall-islands-narcoticsstudent-actcannabis-1987survey-2022/) found that 13.8% of participating students reported marijuana use in the previous thirty days. Researchers collected confidential, anonymous substance-use responses from pupils in grades nine to twelve during March–May.[@4] That study recorded young people’s reported behaviour, while the later amendment addressed drug definitions and onwitnesses’ legal obligations. Parliament passed the amendment in September 2025; it took effect when the Speaker certified it on 6 October. The [Marshall Islands profile](/country/mh/). In the index, the reporting amendment is a context event and moves no score. It expands an enforcement obligation around the prohibited market, but it does not alter the statutory penalty used to score explains how those obligations fit alongside possession, cultivation, sharing, consumption or accesssupply and medical exceptions.[@1,3,4]

sources

Marshall Islands — Prohibited Drugs (Prohibition and Control) (Amendment) Act 2025 Marshall Islands — Prohibited Drugs (Prohibition and Control) (Amendment) Act 2020 Marshall Islands Ministry of Health and Human Services — Rapid High School Survey 2022 1 unchanged

marshall-islands-narcotics-act-1987 articles/marshall-islands-narcotics-act-1987.md

text

The Marshall Islands' Prohibited Drugs Act created a nationwide cannabis ban. It commenced’ national narcotics law took effect on 20 March 1987. It prohibited cannabis possession, cultivation and still suppliesdistribution while allowing specified professional and prescription exceptions. An early marijuana prosecution under the core prohibitions, although the official text is now consolidated withlaw later amendmentsproduced a Supreme Court ruling on the right to a lawyer.[@1,2] ## Cannabis throughout the statute The act definesAn early possession case tested defendants’ rights George Sakaio pleaded guilty to marijuana broadly as any part ofpossession without a cannabis plant, growing or not, including its seedslawyer and resin and preparations made from themreceived two years in prison. Hashish and tetrahydrocannabinol are separated intoHe immediately asked to withdraw the definition of “marijuana concentrate”; both categories are prohibited drugs. Section 903 prohibits possessingplea, selling or disposing of a prohibited drugbut the High Court refused. It later also prohibits knowingly planting, cultivating, producing, manufacturing or controlling one, along with prescribing, selfrefused to let the Public Defender represent him because he had already been convicted.[@2] In [the 1989 appeal](/history/marshall-administeringislands-sakaio-counsel-1989/), importing, exportingthe Supreme Court reversed the conviction and transporting it except wheresent the act provides otherwisecase back. It required police and courts to protect access to legal assistance, and judges to ensure a defendant understood a guilty plea and any decision to give up a lawyer.[@2] ## Penalties by amountMarijuana and record The consolidated section 909 gives marijuana its ownconcentrates have different penalty bands Later versions of the law give ordinary marijuana a quantity-based ladder. AThe [2020 amendment](/history/marshall-islands-drug-asset-seizure-2020/) set out a first offence involving one ounce or less carriesat a fine of $1,000 to $–5,000 fine, six months to one year in prison, or both.[@3] More than onean ounce on a first offence—, or onean ounce or less after an earlier conviction—raises the range to $5,000–$25,000 or one to five years carries higher penalties. A later conviction involving more than one ounce can bring five to fifteen years. Concentrates are subject to different thresholds such as hashish and much heavier maximumsTHC have their own weight bands. Supplying any marijuana to a person under eighteen also attracts an additional fine of $25penalty.[@1,000–3] A January 2020 newspaper report illustrates a different outcome from Sakaio’s immediate prison sentence. Gandhi Heine received a six-month suspended sentence and a $501,000 or fivefine after pleading guilty to fifteen years, or botha marijuana import. These are the current consolidated bands; the document identifies amendments in 1991, 1992, 2020 and 2025, so not every present detail should be attributed His lawyer said it had been intended for personal use to the original 1987 enactmentrelieve back pain.[@4] ## A narrow medical exception The act exempts licensed medical practitionersMedical handling prohibited drugs foris tied to professional work, approved research, teaching or chemical analysis. It alsocontrols The Act recognises licensed professional possession and possession obtained under a valid medical prescription. Practitioner licences identify the drug and exact quantity and last one year. The government is the sole importer and distributor for that lawfulcontrolled channel. Those clauses create controlled professional authority[@1] Practitioners must keep records of drugs received, not proof that patients can presently obtain cannabis medicines in practiceadministered or dispensed, retaining them for two years. The act remains Approved research, teaching and chemical analysis also fall within the foundation of the strict professional exceptions.[Marshall Islands profile@1](/country/mh/) ## Later amendments widened enforcement powers The 2020 revision expressly added cash to property liable to seizure in drug transport, import or export cases. A later Owners have a defined period to seek recovery through the High Court.[@3] In [October 2025 amendment](/history/marshall-islands-drug-reporting-duty-2025/) added a public reporting duty. In the index, the 1987 ban moves the country from an unregulated scoreanother amendment required reports of 58witnessed drug activity and expressly added cannabis and concentrates to 6 across the six segmentsprohibited-drug definition. It is the The [Marshall Islands' only recorded score-changing cannabis event profile](/country/mh/) brings those later rules together with the ordinary possession, cultivation and supply penalties.[@1,5]

sources

Marshall Islands Supreme Court — Republic v Sakaio, 18 October 1989 Marshall Islands — Prohibited Drugs (Prohibition and Control) (Amendment) Act 2020 Marshall Islands Journal — Gandhi fined $1,000 for marijuana import, 3 January 2020 Marshall Islands — Prohibited Drugs (Prohibition and Control) (Amendment) Act 2025 1 unchanged

Code, design and documents 1 file

docs/research/history-marshall-gap-2026-10-23.md +55 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Marshall Islands: cannabis cases, asset seizure and reporting duties — 23 October 2026
+
+Adds four events, revises two, adds one article and rewrites the two existing law articles. All thirteen profile blocks now have inline citations. The six scores remain unchanged at **11 overall**, as do recreational `illegal` and access 0. Medical classification is corrected from `none` to `limited`. Categories and tags follow the current writing/data rules.
+
+Local PDFs, catalogue pages, text extractions, OCR, images, the batch and exact source objects are retained in `tmp/history-marshall-gap-2026-10-23/`. Public text distinguishes an enacted date from a reporting date and preserves fines/suspended sentences as distinct from immediate custody.
+
+## The 1989 marijuana appeal
+
+The judiciary’s **Marshall Islands Law Reports, volume 1**, was downloaded (`court1.pdf/.txt`). **Republic v Sakaio**, Supreme Court criminal appeal 88-01, **18 October 1989**, occupies printed pp. **182–191**. The full relevant judgment was read, including the facts, missing trial record, police/court advice duties, informed guilty plea, waiver of counsel, requested withdrawal and disposition. It is the primary source, not the headnote alone.
+
+George Sakaio pleaded guilty to marijuana possession under P.L. 1987-11 without a lawyer and immediately received two years. He asked to withdraw the plea and was refused. At a hearing five days later, the Public Defender was refused permission to represent him because he had already been convicted. The Supreme Court reversed and remanded for further action. It found denial of legal assistance and insufficient assurance that the plea/waiver were understood. It did not acquit him, grant a cannabis exemption or change the substantive penalty ladder. Quantity and conviction history are not supplied in this opinion, so the two years are not described as the standard punishment for a first small amount. The event is case-specific enforcement under existing constitutional rights, tagged court/sentencing/police powers, rather than a new score step.
+
+## Signed 2020 and 2025 amendments
+
+The official parliament index and public-law library supplied the original scans. A file advertised as the initial 1987 version (`initial-version.pdf`) actually includes the 2020 amendment; it is not treated as the original enactment. Guessed older amendment paths returned 404 and were not cited as recovered sources.
+
+**P.L. 2020-12** was recovered through the parliament’s 2020 download link (`amend2020.pdf`). Its preamble, definitions, possession/control wording, marijuana penalty scale, seizure provisions, minor-supply rule and effective-date/certification clauses were reviewed with local Vision OCR (`amend2020-ocr.txt`). The final certificate was visually checked: parliamentary passage **21 May 2020**, certification **4 June 2020**. The operative clause makes certification the commencement date.
+
+The amendment renames the law, expressly covers methamphetamine, MDMA and synthetic cathinones, and adds cash to drug-transport/import/export seizure powers. It republishes the separate marijuana and concentrate ladders and the penalties for supplying minors. Its preamble refers to changing proof burdens, but the public text does not turn that statement into a broader unsupported description of the operative owner-recovery procedure. It states the positive cash addition and the one-month recovery procedure. The event is `tightening`, with an explicit unscored reason: this property rule is not evidence of a whole-point change to ordinary adult possession/use/supply scores. It does not claim this was the first forfeiture authority.
+
+**P.L. 2025-37** was downloaded from the parliament’s amending-act folder (`amend2025.pdf`). All three pages were read through OCR, with the certificate visually checked. This caught an OCR error that rendered the day as 1: the signed date is **6 October 2025**, after passage **19 September 2025**. Section 103 commences the Act on certification. The existing year-only history event is corrected to **2025-10-06**. The existing reporting-duty article is rewritten around the recovered original, including the definition addition omitted from its earlier account.
+
+The amendment does two things: it expressly adds marijuana and marijuana concentrate to the prohibited-drug definition, and creates section 912A’s reporting duty. The latter requires people who witness activities involving drugs to report to national or local police, protects good-faith reporters against criminal/civil penalties, guarantees confidentiality of the information and sets a $1,000 fine for non-compliance. The public text follows that wording; it does not invent a reasonable-suspicion standard, reporting deadline or witness immunity beyond good faith.
+
+The explicit definition addition matters because the 2020 revision’s new prohibited-drug list did not expressly name cannabis even though marijuana definitions, the older deeming clause, penalty bands and minor-supply rules remained. No binding decision establishing a legal cannabis interval was recovered. No decriminalisation interval is invented from that drafting issue, and the 2025 addition is not called the first cannabis prohibition. The reporting duty concerns witnesses; it and the definition clarification have a documented unscored reason.
+
+## A reported personal-import sentence
+
+The publisher’s **Marshall Islands Journal issue of 3 January 2020**, printed p. **15**, was opened and its full short item **“Gandhi fined $1,000 for marijuana import”** read in the publisher’s FlipHTML5 text version. Direct shell download returned 403; the browser-search tool’s opened page and text version were readable. The viewer’s **5 February upload date** is not confused with the printed newspaper date.
+
+The report names Gandhi Heine, Chief Justice Carl Ingram, Chief Public Defender Russell Kun and Assistant Attorney General Meuton Laiden. It describes a guilty plea under a negotiated agreement, a **six-month sentence entirely suspended**, a **$1,000 fine**, probation conditions and marijuana found in an envelope at the Uliga post office. The relief-of-back-pain explanation is attributed to the defence lawyer; no valid prescription or medical exemption is inferred. The new entry uses **3 January 2020 as the reporting date**, explicitly stating that it is a newspaper report. The relative Friday reference is not converted into an exact judgment date without the court order. The original order and any later probation outcome remain retrieval tasks.
+
+Fewer than 200 derived words from this newspaper item are used across its event, the profile and the rewritten 1987 article. The remaining legal claims are supported by the actual statutes or court judgment.
+
+## School survey evidence
+
+The Ministry of Health and Human Services’ **Rapid High School Survey 2022**, hosted by PIHOA, was downloaded (`survey2022.pdf/.txt`). The ministry introduction, **methodology p. 7**, sample section and **marijuana findings p. 13** were read. Fieldwork was **March–May 2022**, covering public/private high schools and pupils in grades 9–12 who were present on survey days. Substance-use responses were completed confidentially and submitted anonymously.
+
+The report gives **13.8%** reporting marijuana use in the preceding thirty days. The culture event is dated to the **2022 fieldwork**, not the later hosting date. Public text consistently refers to participating high school students, not all residents, all youth or a clinical diagnosis. The report has conflicting sample totals in its contents and sample heading (2,621 versus 2,811), so neither is promoted as an independently resolved denominator. No sex/atoll comparisons or trend claims are needed. Fewer than 200 derived words from this report are used across the event, profile and reporting-duty article. The study supplies historical context; it is not asserted to have caused the 2025 amendment.
+
+## Profile, original-law article and remaining gaps
+
+The current parliament consolidation (`current.pdf/.txt`) was read for definitions, prohibitions, medical/professional exceptions, licensing/records, penalties, forfeiture and reporting. It retains commencement **20 March 1987**, but carries 1991, 1992, 2020 and 2025 changes. No modern band is backdated wholesale to 1987. The rewritten article links the early Sakaio prosecution to later dated amendments and identifies the current/2020 scales as later versions. Its stale static score statement is removed.
+
+The profile replaces unsourced “None” production/product text and the unsupported comparison with local incomes. It describes the separate concentrate bands, government-controlled professional channel, prescribed possession and ordinary prohibitions. Section 902(2) expressly extends the relevant medical/professional provisions to marijuana and concentrates, and the current prohibited-drug definition also explicitly includes both. This legal authority fits the schema’s `limited` category, which includes non-operating frameworks, so medical is corrected from `none` to `limited`. No operating patient service or issued cannabis licence was verified; access stays 0. The correction does not date a new programme or infer actual dispensing from a generic exception. Small-case fines and suspended custody are case-specific, not a national sentencing distribution. Clubs and visitors statuses remain unchanged; seed/cutting restrictions are tied to the actual broad plant definition and control provisions.
+
+The pre-1987 history remains open. **Trust Territory v Bermudes**, 7 TTR 80 (1974), was retrieved from the CNMI Law Revision Commission (`1974-case.pdf/.txt`). It concerns the **Mariana Islands District**, regulatory delegation and unequal marijuana penalties under territorial law. It is not automatically transplanted into a dated Marshall Islands legalisation or first-ban entry. Reconstructing the relevant Trust Territory law, its Marshall Islands application, the 1974 ruling’s scope and later replacements is still necessary. The existing 1987 FREE-before editorial baseline is preserved, **not treated as proof that the islands were unregulated until 1987**. An earlier first restriction must be added and the trajectory rebased when the applicable sources are established.
+
+Likewise, the original **1991 and 1992 amending instruments** were not recovered. Consolidated section notes identify those changes, but do not safely establish every earlier clause or penalty before them; no guessed first forfeiture or penalty increase is created. Micronesian Seminar’s older field report was retrieved as a lead but not used in public claims. A 2025 judiciary-report search lead is not used as a cannabis conviction count without reading and reconciling the full report.
+
+## Verification and commit scope
+
+The batch verifier checks four additions, two revisions, tags/categories, source use, citation punctuation, article lengths and links, all thirteen profile blocks, unchanged numeric scores/recreational classification and the corrected limited medical classification. Articles contain 419, 419 and 423 words with four sections each. The country chain remains 100 → 11 at the existing first event with no direction warning. The full production build and rendered citation/API/export checks are run before committing; the generated `site/` directory is then deleted. Only these six history IDs, the Marshall Islands profile, three article files and this memo are committed; unrelated shared-file objects and index entries are preserved.
+
+Verification completed: four additions, two revised entries, one new article and two rewritten articles pass tag/category/source/inline-link checks; all three article files meet the 350–500-word/four-section requirements. Thirteen profile blocks resolve their keyed citations. The production build passed with 3,912 pages. Rendered checks validated 68 citation links, tag/internal links, clean machine exports and matching API/CSV score 11 with the corrected Limited medical classification. The country chain has no direction warnings, and `git diff --check` passed. The generated `tmp/history-marshall-gap-2026-10-23/site/` directory was deleted after verification.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.