Cannabis Freedom Index

Changelog 15a713a

Correct Timor-Leste’s enacted drug law and extend its history

6 history entries added2 history entries edited1 country profile edited2 articles written1 file of code, design or docs +558 −78 lines

History changes.yaml

Added 6

Edited 2

Timor-Leste’s president urges a different approach to cannabis

title

Timor-Leste'’s president calls forurges a different drug policyapproach to cannabis

description

President José Ramos-Horta gave a speech calling for a more progressive drug policy that wouldurged Timor-Leste to distinguish cannabis from narcoticsmethamphetamine and heroin, and to reconsider the costs of punitive prohibition.[@1] Speaking to Parliament after cannabis investigations in Dili, he criticised procedural failures that could undermine the presumption of innocence and argued for considering medical and economic uses.[@1] His intervention followed the justice minister’s call for tougher penalties; in November he again advocated medical cannabis in his independence-anniversary address.[@2,3]

sources

President José Ramos-Horta — Address to the National Parliament, 15 September 2022 TATOLI — Justice minister asks Parliament to amend the drug law, 17 August 2022 President José Ramos-Horta — Independence anniversary address, 28 November 2022 Wikipedia — Cannabis in East Timor

tags

patients, treatment, court

related

timor-leste-dili-drug-arrests-2022, timor-leste-drug-penalty-call-2022, timor-leste-drug-law-2017

Timor-Leste sets separate penalties for personal cannabis use

date

2017-01-26

tags

sentencing, thresholds, treatment, home-growing

title

Timor-Leste passes its own drug lawsets separate penalties for personal cannabis use

description

Law 2/2017 on combatingTimor-Leste’s drug trafficking andlaw made illicit use filled a gap in the legal system. Until then the authorities had applied Indonesia's Law 5 of 1997, which the new law's preamble said produced results contrary to the principle of humanity. The law punishes trafficking, including unauthorisedpossession and growing, with 5 solely for personal consumption punishable by up to 15 yearsone year in prison (Article 7), and use or possession for personal use with upa 120-day fine, rising to six monthstwo years or a 240-day fine (Article 26);above five daily reference quantities.[@1] Courts may waive punishment for an occasional user may be let offin the penaltylower band, and people seeking treatment have confidentiality protections.[@1] The law replaced reliance on inherited Indonesian legislation, kept trafficking penalties of five to fifteen years, and took effect the day after its 25 January publication.[@1]

sources

Timor-Leste — Law 2/2017, final text in Jornal da República, 25 January 2017 Ministério da Justiça de Timor-Leste — Lei n.º 2/2017

related

timor-leste-drug-bill-passed-2016, timor-leste-cannabis-plants-conviction-2017, timor-leste-ramos-horta-speech-2022

Countries and states 1 file

Timor-Leste countries/tl.yaml

summary

Illegal;Cannabis use, possession and growing solely for personal use carriesconsumption are criminal offences, punishable by up to six monthsone year in prison or a fine, and trafficking 5with a higher ceiling above the statutory quantity threshold. Courts may waive punishment for an occasional user in the lower band. Trafficking carries five to 15fifteen years, while the law provides confidentiality and treatment options for people who use drugs.

segments › possession › text

Illegal for all purposes. Under Article 26 of Law 2/2017, a person who holdsIllicit possession or acquires cannabis onlyacquisition solely for personal use facescarries up to six monthsone year in prison or a fine ofassessed over up to 60120 days. Above five times the daily reference amount inquantities the law'sceiling rises to two years or a 240-day fine; the annex (sets daily references of 1 g of herbal cannabis, 0.5 g of resin, and 0.25 g of oil) the ceiling rises to one year or a fine of up to 120 days. An occasional user may be let offin the penaltylower band may have punishment waived.[@law]

segments › possession › sources

l2law

segments › cultivation › text

Growing without authorisation is trafficking under Article 7, with 5 to 15 years in prison. Growing onlysolely for one's own usepersonal consumption falls under Article 26the personal-use offence: up to six monthsone year in prison or a 120-day fine of up, rising to 60 daystwo years or a 240-day fine above the quantity threshold.[@law] Unauthorised cultivation outside the personal-use offence falls under trafficking, with five to fifteen years in prison.[@law]

segments › cultivation › sources

l2law

segments › enforcement › text

The president has said publicly that drug policy should distinguishPrison is used in cannabis from more dangerous drugs —cases: Lusa reported a rare signalthree-and-a-half-year sentence for Australian resident Tony Crean in the region — but theOctober 2017, followed by a planned defence appeal.[@conviction] In a different 2022 drug case, nine suspects were placed under identity-and-residence declarations and periodic reporting.[@release] The law has not changedallows fines, waiver for occasional users in the lower band and suspension of prison for a person with drug dependence who voluntarily accepts treatment.[@law]

segments › enforcement › sources

mbconviction, release, law

segments › sharing › text

Offering, selling, distributing or giving controlled cannabis to another person is traffickingwithout authorisation falls under Article 7 of Law 2/2017trafficking, punished with 5normally five to 15fifteen years. Where the wrong is[@law] A considerably smaller, Article 11 sets 1less serious case carries one to 5five years, and a person who deals onlywhile dealing exclusively to obtain drugs for personalthe dealer’s own use facescarries up to two years or a fine under Article 12.[@law]

segments › sharing › sources

l2law

segments › consumption › text

Consumption itselfIllicit consumption is ana separate offence under Article 26 of Law 2/2017, withcarrying up to six monthsone year in prison or a 120-day fine of up to 60 daysin the lower band; courts may waive punishment for an occasional user may be let off the penaltyin that band. A user who asks[@law] People seeking help from a doctor or health institution for help is guaranteed anonymity under Article 27have confidentiality protections, and medical staff are not required to report their identity or treatment to the criminal authorities.[@law]

segments › consumption › sources

l2law

segments › access › text

NoneThe drug law provides no recreational retail exception. Law 2/2017 treats unauthorised growingIt requires Health Ministry licensing, authorisations and supply as trafficking and punishes growingsupervision for one's own use as wellhandling substances in its controlled-drug tables, under rules to be set in a separate instrument.[@law] The 2025 pharmaceutical law continues to define narcotics and psychotropic substances by reference to those tables.[@pharma]

segments › access › sources

l2law, pharma

context › production › text

NoneCultivation, manufacture, trade and imports of controlled cannabis require the relevant authorisation; unauthorised production and supply outside the personal-use offence attract trafficking penalties.[@law] In June 2022, police reported seizing a suspected marijuana parcel sent from Ireland and referring its recipient for an initial court hearing.[@police]

context › production › sources

wikilaw, police

context › products › text

NoneTable I-C controls cannabis leaves and flowering or fruiting tops, resin, oil and cannabis seeds not intended for sowing.[@law] The 2025 pharmaceutical rules define narcotics and psychotropic substances through the 2017 drug law’s schedules.[@pharma]

context › products › sources

wikilaw, pharma

context › medical › text

NoThe law places controlled-drug handling under Health Ministry licensing and supervision and provides for separate implementing rules.[@law] In his November 2022 independence-anniversary address, President José Ramos-Horta advocated legalising medical cannabis.[@nov]

context › medical › sources

wikilaw, nov

context › consequences › text

Under Article 17 of Law 2/2017, the owner or manager of aA hotel, restaurant, café, club or venue operator who allows it to be used forpermits illicit drug use, production or trafficking, or knowingly fails to prevent it, faces 2two to 8eight years in prison.[@law] A foreigner convicted under the law may also be expelled for up to twenty years.[@law]

context › consequences › sources

l2law

context › planting › text

Law 2/2017 listsThe final law expressly schedules cannabis as theseeds not intended for sowing, alongside leaves and, flowering or fruiting tops of the plant, resin and its articles do not mention seedsoil. Growing without authorisation is trafficking under Article 7;[@law] It also punishes growing onlysolely for one's own use falls under Article 26,personal consumption with up to six monthsone year in prison or a fine in the lower band. Unauthorised cultivation outside that offence falls under trafficking; personal growing remains a criminal offence.[@law]

context › planting › sources

l2law

context › clubs › text

No cannabis clubs are known, and theThe drug law leavesprovides no room for them: growing cannabis-club exception to its unauthorised growing and supplyingsupply offences.[@law] A club or venue operator who permits illicit use or trafficking, or knowingly fails to stop it, may face two to another person are both prohibitedeight years in prison.[@law]

context › clubs › sources

wikilaw

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreational supply for anyone. Possession for personal Personal-use ispossession remains a crime under Article 26 of Law 2/2017criminal offence, withcarrying up to six monthsone year in prison or a fine in the lower band.[@law] Unauthorised imports outside the personal-use offence fall under trafficking, and a foreigner convicted under the drug law may also be expelled for up to twenty years.[@law]

context › visitors › sources

l2law

sources

Timor-Leste — Law 2/2017, final text in Jornal da República, 25 January 2017 Lusa via RTP — Australian sentenced to three and a half years in Timor-Leste, 20 October 2017 RTTL — Student movement challenges court supervision of nine drug suspects, 19 August 2022 Timor-Leste — Decree-Law 2/2025 on pharmaceutical trade, 22 January 2025 Timor-Leste National Police — Suspected marijuana parcel referred to court, reported June 2022 President José Ramos-Horta — Independence anniversary address, 28 November 2022 Lei n.º 2/2017 — Lei de Combate ao Tráfico e Consumo Ilícito de Droga, Portuguese and Tetum (Timor-Leste Customs Authority copy) Wikipedia — Cannabis in Timor-Leste Macau Business (Lusa) — Timor-Leste drug policy should distinguish cannabis from dangerous drugs, says president

Articles and atlas entries 2

Code, design and documents 1 file

docs/research/history-timor-gap-2026-10-23.md +143 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+# Timor-Leste: final drug law and enforcement history — 23 October 2026
+
+This batch adds six events, revises the 2017 law and September 2022 speech entries,
+writes two articles and converts thirteen profile blocks to inline citations.
+The principal correction is replacing an unfinalised bilingual copy with the
+actual enacted law. Source files, full extractions, scripts and logs are retained
+in `tmp/history-timor-gap-2026-10-23/`; exact metadata is in `sources.json`.
+
+## Final law versus the former source
+
+The former Ministry of Justice translation and Customs copy were downloaded and
+examined (`law.pdf/.txt`, `customs.pdf/.txt`). They have blank approval fields,
+a different preamble, different final article numbering and lower personal-use
+penalties than the published Act. The Council of Ministers approval date is blank.
+Their formal-looking law number does not make those versions reliable evidence
+of the final enacted provisions.
+
+The official Jornal da República, Série I No. 4 of **25 January 2017**, was then
+downloaded (`gazette2017.pdf`, layout and raw extractions). Law 2/2017 occupies
+printed pages 60–82. Relevant definitions, schedules and articles 6–7, 11–17,
+22–29 and 49–50 were read with surrounding text. PDF page 8, printed page 66,
+was visually inspected to confirm the personal-use rules and treatment provisions.
+
+The final article 26 differs materially from the former source:
+
+| Rule | Former bilingual copy | Final gazette |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Personal-use lower band | Six months / 60-day fine | One year / 120-day fine |
+| Above five daily reference quantities | One year / 120-day fine | Two years / 240-day fine |
+| Occasional user in lower band | Possible waiver | Possible waiver |
+| Final commencement article | 53 | 50 |
+| Cannabis seeds in Table I-C | No separate seed entry | Seeds not intended for sowing expressly included |
+
+The daily reference table retains 1 g herbal cannabis, 0.5 g resin and 0.25 g oil.
+These are reference quantities for penalty tiers, not lawful possession allowances.
+The text keeps the multiplier rather than inventing a THC-adjusted calculation.
+Growing solely for personal consumption is expressly within article 26; cultivation
+outside that offence falls within unauthorised trafficking under article 7.
+
+Article 50 commences the law the day after publication, establishing **26 January
+2017**. The final text records parliamentary approval on **18 October 2016** and
+promulgation on **23 January 2017**. The trade portal's December date is not used.
+The new passage event uses the government's contemporary account, corroborated by
+the final gazette, and remains debate until the enacted law's commencement.
+
+The final preamble discusses inherited Indonesian Law 5/1997 and constitutional
+incompatibilities. It does not establish that Timor-Leste could lawfully impose
+capital punishment before 2017: it expressly notes the constitution's existing
+absolute prohibition. No death-penalty abolition event is invented for 2017.
+
+## Case reporting and political debate
+
+- Lusa's full 31 January 2017 report, hosted by RTP, was downloaded and read
+  (`pretrial2017.html/.txt`, plus body extract). It describes a five-plant case,
+  initial reporting/passport conditions, a prosecution appeal and pretrial custody.
+  Testing and alleged conduct were disputed. Pretrial detention is not described
+  as a conviction or a final finding of trafficking.
+- Lusa's full 20 October 2017 trial report was read (`conviction2017...`). It names
+  Tony Crean, reports a three-and-a-half-year prison sentence for possession and
+  trafficking, acquittal of consumption after a negative urine test and a planned
+  defence appeal. The judgment and later appeal outcome were not recovered. The
+  report's account of prosecution requests is not substituted for statutory maxima
+  or used to resolve which historical provisions applied to alleged 2016 conduct.
+- The National Police's complete June 2022 release was read (`police-import...`).
+  It gives seizure on **1 June**, a press conference/court referral on **3 June**,
+  and publication on **6 June**. A 43-year-old recipient was detained after a
+  suspected marijuana parcel arrived from Ireland; the quantity was still under
+  examination. The Tetum wording about propagation material does not establish
+  a precise botanical form, seed viability or quantity. The event therefore says
+  suspected marijuana parcel and is tagged trade/enforcement, not a proven seed
+  import or a settled ruling about seed legality.
+- TATOLI's full Indonesian-language 15 August report was read (`arrests2022...`).
+  It places a joint operation on **11–12 August**, involving nine suspects and
+  reported cannabis/methamphetamine seizures. Ambiguous hashish quantity wording
+  is not converted into an invented weight. The event has month precision to cover
+  the two-day operation. Allegations are not presented as established guilt.
+- RTTL's complete 19 August report was read (`release2022...`). It records identity/
+  residence declarations and periodic reporting, plus student opposition announced
+  on Thursday 18 August. The custody decision is distinct from an acquittal.
+- TATOLI's full Tetum report of **17 August** was read (`minister2022...`). Justice
+  Minister Tiago Amaral Sarmento sought increased penalties and different trial
+  arrangements, criticising the prosecution while acknowledging the judge's role.
+  His reported description of article 7's penalties does not match the final law;
+  only his policy request and attributed criticism are used, not that legal claim.
+- The president's original **15 September 2022** parliamentary address was downloaded
+  and read at its police-procedure/drug-policy passages, printed pages 10–12
+  (`speech-sep.pdf/.txt`). It replaces the old Wikipedia citation. Ramos-Horta links
+  Dili cannabis investigations to police legitimacy, argues for distinguishing
+  cannabis from methamphetamine/heroin and advocates reconsidering prohibition.
+  His clinical/economic claims and forecasts are not presented as verified outcomes.
+- His original **28 November 2022** independence-anniversary address was downloaded;
+  its relevant justice/drug-policy passage was read (`speech-nov.pdf/.txt`). It
+  renews the medical-cannabis argument. It is supporting follow-up context, not
+  another entry implying an implemented programme.
+- Decree-Law 2/2025 was read at its opening and article 4(h) in the official
+  **22 January 2025** gazette (`pharma2025.pdf/.txt`). It defines narcotics and
+  psychotropic substances by reference to the 2017 law's Tables I–IV. That generic
+  definition neither excludes cannabis from control nor establishes a cannabis
+  patient-access programme. No such inference is made from general pharmacy rules.
+
+## Profile and score treatment
+
+The profile now uses the final law for possession, growing, consumption, sharing,
+medical licensing, consequences and planting. Broad unsupported “None” product/
+production claims and Wikipedia citations were replaced with specific statutory
+rules. The seeds text now reflects the explicit final schedule entry. Existing
+seed/clone classifications are preserved; an unlisted sowing purpose is not treated
+as proof of a lawful import or a right to cultivate.
+
+The enforcement section now uses actual reporting about a prison sentence and a
+separate supervised-release decision, together with the statute's waiver, fine and
+treatment options. These examples are not a nationwide sentencing-frequency study.
+The six numeric scores remain possession 1, cultivation 1, enforcement 1, sharing 1,
+consumption 1 and access 0 (overall 9). Further sentencing-practice evidence is
+needed to strengthen the enforcement calibration. Medical remains none: general
+licensing powers and presidential advocacy do not prove an operating patient route.
+
+The penalty correction is a correction to what the 2017 law already enacted,
+not a new 2026 tightening. The 2017 event remains `other`: the inherited regime's
+cannabis-specific penalties have not been independently reconstructed well enough
+to assign an aggregate directional score change. The first-restriction estimate
+stays in place; the exact colonial prohibition is still an open research gap.
+
+## Validation and commit scope
+
+The scoped verifier passes for eight touched events, valid categories/tags, title
+lengths, related links, source identity deduplication and inline citations. The
+articles have **411 and 386 words**, each with four headings and country plus
+contextual history links. All thirteen profile text blocks pass citation checks.
+Current numeric scores and status/classification fields match the starting snapshot;
+the score-chain check flags no transitions.
+
+The production build passed: **3,881 pages in 46.02 seconds**. Rendered checks
+passed for **73 citation links**, eight tag pages, history exports and the country
+API with six segments and seven context blocks. The exact exported score remains
+9, medical None. `git diff --check` passed. Generated site output is deleted after
+verification; evidence and logs remain.
+
+A separate Git index assembles only this batch's eight history objects, Timor-Leste
+profile, two articles and this note. A parent-to-commit semantic audit checks that
+all unrelated history entries are unchanged. The shared main index already contains
+staged versions of some of these edits; refreshing it must preserve any unrelated
+staged history objects and source-archive work rather than resetting the index.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.