Cannabis Freedom Index
← History

Other law 🇷🇸 Serbia

Serbia keeps hemp growing under licence and bans high-THC crops

Parliament adopted a controlled-substances law allowing licensed hemp crops for fibre, animal-feed seed, propagation and specified seed activities. It prohibited growing cannabis varieties capable of containing more than 0.3% THC and required landholders to destroy wild drug-producing plants. The law replaced earlier drug-production and trade legislation; detailed hemp permit conditions followed in 2013.[1][2][3]

The story · written by gpt-6,

Serbia’s parliament adopted a controlled-substances law on 22 December 2010 that kept hemp cultivation under agricultural licence and prohibited cannabis varieties capable of exceeding 0.3% THC. Farmers growing permitted crops had to meet specified fibre-and-seed purposes, while unauthorised drug cultivation remained subject to criminal penalties.

A wider licensing law sat beside the criminal offences

The 2009 Criminal Code amendment had separated small personal possession from production and supply and expressly addressed growing psychoactive cannabis. The new controlled-substances law organised licensing, imports, exports, medical handling and plant controls.

It replaced earlier legislation on drug production and trade. For farmers and businesses, it set out which authority could permit activity and what a permitted hemp crop could be used for.

Criminal sentencing remained governed by the Criminal Code, which then prescribed six months to five years for unauthorised cannabis cultivation.

Fibre and seed crops needed an agriculture permit

The law allowed hemp growing for fibre, seed for animal feed, further propagation, processing, seed-quality testing and seed trade. Both individuals and businesses needed a permit from the ministry responsible for agriculture.

The licensing route involved a production and purchase contract with a registered hemp business, or the grower’s own registration for the relevant activity. Permission was connected to a declared agricultural purpose and an authorised business relationship.

Growers also had to tell the agriculture and interior ministries about circumstances suggesting that the crop or its parts might be diverted to illicit drug production.

Landholders had to remove wild drug-producing plants

The law required destruction of wild plants from which controlled substances could be obtained. Responsibility fell on whoever owned, possessed or used the land.

If the plants remained seven days after an official destruction order, the agriculture ministry could destroy them. This placed an obligation on landholders alongside the prohibition on deliberately cultivating drug-producing plants.

Cannabis varieties capable of containing more than 0.3% THC were expressly prohibited. The law left the permitted varieties and detailed conditions for hemp cultivation to a ministerial rulebook.

Detailed permit rules followed in 2013

Agriculture Minister Goran Knežević’s 2013 rules required registered varieties below 0.3% THC, documented seed and an application before sowing, by 30 April. A permit covered one production year.

During later consultations, the government accepted objections to lowering the hemp THC ceiling, citing the consequences for varieties already grown in Serbia. Licensed agricultural hemp and the separate offences for psychoactive cannabis continue to shape Serbia’s cannabis rules.[1][2][3][4][5]

Listed for context. No score change is recorded for Serbia here.

References

  1. Serbia National Assembly — Act on Psychoactive Controlled Substances, adopted 22 December 2010Original parliamentary PDF inside ZIP; articles 5, 58–60 and 116–117; adoption date confirmed by Assembly’s enacted-laws indexarchived
  2. Serbia — Act on Psychoactive Controlled Substances, consolidated through 2018, reproduced by ParagrafArticles 5, 58–60, 66 and 87: general controls, plant prohibition, licensed hemp purposes and reportsarchived
  3. Serbia Agriculture Ministry — Rulebook on conditions for growing hemp, 2013, reproduced by AgroklubArticles 1–9; Gazette 64/2013, published 24 July; article 9 operates on the eighth day, 1 August; signed by Goran Knežević on 15 Julyarchived
  4. Serbian public prosecution service — Criminal Code consolidated through Gazette 94/2016Articles 246–247; annotations identify 2009 changes: small personal possession, six-month-to-five-year cultivation offence and three-to-twelve-year production/supply offencearchived
  5. Serbia Government — proposed controlled-substances amendment and consultation report, 2018Printed pp. 26–27: consultation events, acceptance of objections to lowering hemp THC ceiling and rejection of proposals to legalise medical cannabis oilarchived

Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.