The story · written by gpt-6,
Serbia’s top court upheld Marko Luković’s three-year prison sentence on 23 January 2019 after finding that drying and packaging cannabis for sale amounted to drug production. The case showed how preparing harvested material could expose a person to the production-and-supply offence alongside the separate cultivation rules.
The code separated growing from producing a drug
The 2009 amendment expressly addressed growing psychoactive cannabis, with six months to five years in prison. Production and supply carried three to twelve years.
The production-and-supply wording covered several acts: making or processing a drug, selling or offering it, and holding or carrying it for sale. An offence could therefore depend on what someone did with the plant material after it had been harvested.
The code also separately addressed small quantities held for personal consumption, with a fine, up to three years or possible waiver of punishment.
Flowers collected near the Morava were dried for sale
Luković had collected flowers from mature cannabis plants near the Morava, taken them home, dried them and packed them in a plastic sack. He later carried the prepared cannabis to Kraljevo for sale.
His lawyer challenged the conclusion that those acts amounted to production. The court rejected that argument and left the three-year sentence in place.
The decisive conduct included processing the harvested flowers and preparing the resulting drug for sale. The judgment described the stages of handling the material as part of its explanation.
Processing added a legal question beyond tending plants
The court distinguished sowing and caring for a plant through its growing period from further work such as drying, breaking up or packaging harvested material. In this case, it found production and possession for sale.
That distinction mattered because the code assigned different prison ranges to cultivation and production. The supply wording also covered holding or carrying a drug for sale, without requiring the case to begin with a completed transaction.
Licensed agricultural hemp had a separate route under the 2010 controlled-substances law, with permits tied to specified fibre-and-seed purposes.
Cultivation sentences rose later that year
The December 2019 amendment raised the cultivation range to two to eight years. It also added a longer sentence for possessing a large quantity of drugs, while retaining the smaller-personal-possession offence.
Serbia’s current profile reflects those separate questions: cultivating a crop, preparing a drug, holding it for sale, and possessing it for personal use can lead to different offences and punishments.[1][2][3][4][5]
Listed for context. No score change is recorded for Serbia here.
References
- Serbia Supreme Court of Cassation — Kzz 1521/2018, judgment of 23 January 2019Pages 1–3: Marko Luković’s three-year sentence; cannabis flowers collected near the Morava, dried and packaged for sale; production distinguished from cultivationarchived
- Serbian public prosecution service — Criminal Code consolidated through Gazette 94/2016Articles 246–247; annotations identify 2009 changes: small personal possession, six-month-to-five-year cultivation offence and three-to-twelve-year production/supply offencearchived
- Serbia Constitutional Court — Bulletin 2/2009Printed pages 62–64, especially p. 63: former drug offence, existing personal-use waiver and 11 September 2009 separation into two offencesarchived
- Serbia National Assembly — Criminal Code amendment, Gazette 35/2019Articles 21–23 and 42: cultivation raised to two–eight years; large possession three–ten years; commencement 1 December 2019archived
- Serbia National Assembly — Act on Psychoactive Controlled Substances, adopted 22 December 2010Original parliamentary PDF inside ZIP; articles 5, 58–60 and 116–117; adoption date confirmed by Assembly’s enacted-laws indexarchived
Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read.