Cannabis Freedom Index
← History

Tightening 🇲🇴 Macau

Macau raises personal-use penalties and exposes larger stocks to prison

Macau raised the personal-use penalty on 27 January 2017 from up to three months in prison to three months–one year, with an alternative fine of sixty–240 day-rates.[1][2] Stocks above five daily reference quantities, even entirely for personal use, fell under production, trafficking or the lesser one-to-five-year tier, depending on the case.[1][2] Ordinary production and trafficking minima rose from three to five years; in 2022 the top court used the lesser tier for two people growing one plant.[1][2][3]

Index score

119

−2 points

The story · written by gpt-6,

Macau increased the punishment for cannabis use and personal possession on 27 January 2017. The prison range became three months to one year, with a fine still available, and larger personal stocks could bring the much heavier production or trafficking penalties.[1]

The earlier law allowed a shorter term

Under the 2009 drug law, illicit consumption and specified acts done exclusively for personal use, including growing and possession, carried up to three months in prison or a fine of up to sixty day-rates. The law also had separate ordinary and lesser production and trafficking offences.[2]

The amendment was published in December 2016. Its main penalty changes took effect thirty days later, in January 2017; a separate change to the controlled-drug schedules took effect the day after publication.[1]

Personal-use penalties rose

For consumption and the listed personal-use acts, the new prison range started at three months and reached one year. The alternative fine became sixty to 240 day-rates. A day-rate fine is calculated through the sentencing system, rather than being a fixed cash tariff for everyone.[1]

Ordinary unauthorised production and trafficking also became more severely punished: the minimum rose from three years to five, with the maximum remaining fifteen years.[1][2]

These changes affected people using cannabis as well as people supplying it. A person caught with a personal stock faced a higher basic penalty and, depending on the amount, a different set of offences.[1]

A personal stock could cross into production or trafficking

The amended law directed conduct involving more than five times a listed daily reference quantity to the production, trafficking or lesser-gravity rules, as appropriate. The calculation counted quantities intended entirely for personal use as well as a stock divided between personal use and supply.[1]

For someone keeping a supply at home, proving that it was all for themselves therefore did not guarantee treatment under the basic personal-use offence. The lesser production and trafficking tier, carrying one to five years, remained among the available outcomes.[1][2]

A later court case showed the lesser tier mattered

In 2022, the top court reviewed a single-plant case. Its leaves and flowers weighed 37.208 grams, above the five-day reference quantity. Two first offenders had initially received combined sentences of five years nine months each.[3]

After considering the plant and the circumstances, the court applied the lesser production tier. Their combined sentences fell to one year nine months and two years, both to be served in custody.[3] The distinction between the ordinary and lesser tiers remains central to the penalties set out in Macau’s current profile.

Score by segment 0 to 10

  1. Possession · 25%1 1
  2. Personal cultivation · 25%1 1
  3. Punishment & enforcement · 20%3 2−1
  4. Sharing & gifting · 10%0 0
  5. Consumption · 10%0 0
  6. Legal access · 10%0 0

The bar shows the score after the change; the tick marks where it stood before. The scores after the change are Macau's current scores.

References

  1. Law 10/2016 — higher drug penalties and personal-use quantitiesIn Boletim Oficial, I Series, No. 52, 28 December 2016 · 2016 · pp. 3060–3062 and 3065; Article 1 replacement Articles 7, 8 and 14; Article 4 commencementarchived
  2. Law 17/2009 — original drug offences and penaltiesIn Boletim Oficial, I Series, No. 32, 10 August 2009 · 2009 · Original Articles 7–8, 11, 14 and 42; Table I-C and daily-reference annexarchived
  3. Court of Final Appeal — lesser production offence for a single cannabis plant2022 · Case 79/2022, 4 November 2022; proven facts, lesser-gravity reasoning and final sentences for C and D

Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read. The score before the change is an editorial estimate.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.