Cannabis Freedom Index
← History

Debate 🇦🇫 Afghanistan

Afghanistan promises drug-control cooperation while describing weak enforcement

Afghan foreign minister Musa Shafiq told US secretary of state William Rogers that hashish and opium cultivation were prohibited under Islamic law but that enforcement was difficult, especially in remote mountain areas. He blamed growing demand from foreign tourists and promised cooperation on drug control. The discussion came as Washington worried that successful action elsewhere could push drug production towards Afghanistan.[1]

The story · written by gpt-6,

Afghanistan’s foreign minister told his American counterpart in October 1971 that hashish cultivation was already prohibited, but the government struggled to enforce the prohibition. He promised cooperation as the United States pressed for a wider effort against drugs.

The talks began with drought and economic pressure

Musa Shafiq met Secretary of State William Rogers in New York on 13 October. Afghanistan was suffering a severe drought, and Shafiq described damage across the economy and a water table at its lowest level in living memory.

He also sought help rescheduling debt. Afghanistan wanted to preserve its credit and independence while avoiding deeper financial dependence on the neighbouring Soviet Union. Drug cooperation was therefore part of a broader conversation about assistance and the country’s position between larger powers.

Foreign visitors brought the drug trade into the discussion

Rogers introduced drugs by asking whether hippies continued to pose a problem. Shafiq said foreign visitors had caused little concern in earlier years, but that growing numbers of young travellers were overstaying and engaging in practices the authorities considered harmful.

Rogers warned that a country’s reputation could be shaped by its attitude to drugs. He pointed to Turkey’s poppy cultivation and said successful American-backed programmes there might encourage buyers to look towards Afghanistan instead.

The concern connected visitors’ demand inside the country with a larger international market. Washington wanted cooperation before changes in one source country shifted the business to another.

Prohibition met geography and farmers’ incomes

Shafiq said hashish and opium cultivation were prohibited under Islamic law because they were intoxicants. He acknowledged that enforcement had been uneven and described particular difficulties in remote mountain areas where drugs were grown.

Ambassador Malikyar raised the income problem: poppy provided cash in poor, isolated communities, and those farmers needed another way to earn. The discussion therefore connected enforcement with replacing a rural livelihood.

A stronger commitment followed the next year

By December 1972, Shafiq had become prime minister. An American memorandum recorded his parliamentary promise of stronger measures against trafficking and a proposed programme against illicit opium cultivation with foreign help.

The rising smuggler arrests and renewed prohibition reported in 1973 followed this earlier diplomatic exchange. It shows how foreign demand, enforcement difficulties and the need for outside support had already become intertwined in Afghanistan’s cannabis history.[1][2]

Listed for context. No score change is recorded for Afghanistan here.

References

  1. US Department of State — Rogers and Shafiq conversation, 13 October 1971FRUS document 350, paragraphs 2–8; telegram sent 14 October 1971archived
  2. US Department of State — Afghanistan narcotics control memorandum, 18 December 1972FRUS document 372, Shafiq's parliamentary programme and the American assessmentarchived

Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.