Cannabis Freedom Index

Changelog f6a2dec

Extend Yemen history through Aden controls and verified Arabic law

5 history entries added1 history entry edited1 country profile edited1 article written1 article edited2 files of code, design or docs +453 −83 lines

History changes.yaml

Added 5

Edited 1

Yemen sets five years for personal use and death for drug supply

date

1993-03-30

title

Yemen's narcotics law provides sets five years for thepersonal use and death penaltyfor drug supply

description

Law 3 of 1993 on illicit trafficking in and use of narcotics punishes import, export and productionYemen’s drug law set five years for trade with death, and tradingholding or giving drugs to a user with death or 25 years. Holding or growing cannabis for personal use carries five years, with residential treatment possibleavailable instead for a person proved dependent.[@1,2] Unpaid supply could bring death or twenty-five years, while importing or manufacturing narcotics for trade carried death.[@1] Cannabis plants were expressly listed among prohibited crops; stalk fibres and seeds treated to prevent germination were exempt parts.[@1,2] The law took effect on issuance on 30 March 1993.[@1,2]

sources

Yemen — Law 3 of 1993, Arabic text published by the Public Prosecution Yemen — Law 3 of 1993 with schedules, Arabic text held by the House of Representatives Harm Reduction International — The Death Penalty for Drug Offences: Global Overview 2010 Mohamah.net — Texts of Law No. 3 of 1993 (Yemen, Arabic)

tags

sentencing, treatment, home-growing

related

yemen-aden-growing-ordinance-1961, yemen-sanaa-drug-law-amendment-draft-2025

Countries and states 1 file

Yemen countries/ye.yaml

summary

Personal possessionHolding or growing cannabis for personal use carries five years in prison under Law 3 of 1993, and trading or supplying drugs carrieswith residential treatment possible instead. Unpaid supply can bring death or 25twenty-five years. Qat, by contrast, is legal.

segments › possession › text

Article 38 of Law 3 of 1993 punishessets five years in prison for holding, or buying drugs, or growing listed plants, for personal use with five years in prison. TheA court maycan order an addict into a clinicresidential treatment instead for a person proved dependent, with a stay of at least six months instead, and no case is brought against a. A user who comes forward forvoluntarily enters treatment on their own. The copy read does not include the schedulesis protected from prosecution under that provision, so it does not show which plants are in Table 5with release decided by a committee after a stay of six months to two years.[@law93, l3]

segments › possession › sources

law93, l3

segments › cultivation › text

ArticleArticles 28 bans–29 prohibit growing or dealing in the Table 5 plants in schedule 5, which expressly includes male and female cannabis. Growing them for tradepersonal use carries death or 25five years (Article 34)under article 38; growing for personal usetrade carries death or twenty-five years (under article 34. Article 38)30 allows government departments and scientific institutes to obtain growing licences for research.[@law93, l3]

segments › cultivation › sources

law93, l3

segments › enforcement › text

The statute sets five years for personal Personal-use holdings and allowsgrowing carry five years, with residential treatment possible instead (Article 38); the court may reducefor a sentence only to the next lower penalty (Article 37)person proved dependent. How it is applied is not shown byUnpaid supply carries death or twenty-five years; importing or manufacturing narcotics for trade carries death.[@law93] The internationally recognised government’s reported drug-use cases for 2025 are recorded below; those figures cover the textgovernorates it controls.[@ym26]

segments › enforcement › sources

law93, ym26

segments › sharing › text

Article 35 punishes givingsets death or twenty-five years for supplying drugs to a userfor consumption without payment, or makingfacilitating their use easier, withoutside the authorised circumstances. Article 34 also applies death or 25twenty-five years in prison, the same asto trading (Article 34)and running or preparing premises for drug use.[@law93]

segments › consumption › text

Article 38 punishessets five years for holding or buying drugs, or growing listed plants, for consumption or personal use or consumption, with five yearsa residential-treatment alternative for a person proved dependent. Article 40 sets up to one year for knowingly being present where drug consumption is taking place in prisonpremises prepared for it, with treatment possible insteadspecified family exceptions.[@law93] Qat, a mild stimulant leaf chewed daily by most Yemeni men, is legal and central to social life.[@albab]

segments › access › text

None for personal useArticle 2 prohibits unauthorised possession and drug transactions. Imports forArticles 3–4 restrict imports to authorised medical and scientific use need prior written permission from the health ministry (Article 3)channels, while article 14 requires a medical prescription for pharmacy dispensing. There is no recreational cannabis supply route in these provisions.[@law93]

context › death penalty › text

ArticlesArticle 33 to 35 of Law 3 of 1993 punishprescribes death for importing, producing or trading in drugs, and supplying a user, withmanufacturing narcotics for trade. Articles 34–35 prescribe death or 25twenty-five years in prisonfor trading, growing for trade, unpaid supply and preparing premises for drug use.[@law93]

context › consequences › text

The retained sources do not establish collateral consequences beyondArticles 36 and 43 provide for confiscation of criminal proceeds, drugs and equipment or vehicles used in offences. A conviction for an offence also bars a person from obtaining the penaltiesdrug-trading licence described abovein article 8.[@law93]

context › consequences › sources

law93

context › planting › text

Law 3 of 1993 bansArticles 28–29 prohibit growing the listed plants (Article 28) and, dealing in Article 29, importing, owning, holding, buying or selling them at anyevery stage of growth, as well asincluding their seeds; plant parts named in a separate schedule are exempt. The Minister of Agriculture may license onlySchedule 5 expressly names male and female cannabis. Schedule 6 exempts stalk fibres and cannabis seeds treated so they cannot germinate. Article 30 limits research-growing licences to government departments and scientific institutes to grow them or import seeds.[@law93, l3]

context › planting › sources

law93, l3

context › clubs › text

No cannabis clubs are known, and the law leavesThe statute provides no room for them: growingrecreational cannabis and-club route. Growing for personal use carries five years; supplying it to another person are both prohibited,drugs without payment and the law providespreparing premises for theconsumption carry death penalty for the most serious drug offencesor twenty-five years.[@law93]

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreational supplyUnauthorised possession for anyonepersonal use carries five years, sowith residential treatment possible for a visitor has no lawful way to buy cannabisperson proved dependent. Unpaid supply can bring death or twenty-five years, and imports for trade can bring death. The sources behind this profile describestatute provides no separate rule for visitorsrecreational supply route.[@law93]

sources

Yemen — Law 3 of 1993 with schedules, Arabic text held by the House of Representatives Yemen — Law 3 of 1993, Arabic text published by the Public Prosecution قانون رقم (3) لسنة 1993م بشأن مكافحة الاتجار والاستعمال غير المشروعين للمخدرات والمؤثرات العقلية (University of Minnesota Human Rights Library, PDF) Mohamah.net — Texts of Law No. 3 of 1993 on combating illicit trafficking in and use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (Yemen, Arabic) 2 unchanged

Articles and atlas entries 2

yemen-narcotics-law-1993 articles/yemen-narcotics-law-1993.md

text

Yemen'’s Law No. 3 of 1993 joined ordinarydrug law set five years in prison for possessing or growing cannabis for personal -use imprisonment. Giving drugs to capital punishmentanother person for some supply offences. Cannabis is covered through the law's controlled plants and substances consumption without payment could bring death or twenty-five years, although the reproduced text's searchable body does not display the annexed schedules themselves while a person proved dependent could be sent to residential treatment instead of prison.[@1,2] ## A national drugThe law named cannabis directly The law concerns illicit trafficking and use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. It was issued in Sana'atook effect on issuance on 30 March 1993 and took effect from its date of issue. Articles 28 Its schedules covered cannabis as a drug and 29 prohibit cultivating specified scheduledexpressly named male and female cannabis among the plants whose cultivation was prohibited.[@1,2] An earlier [Aden ordinance](/history/yemen-aden-growing-ordinance-1961/) had already prohibited cannabis growing within that colony and handling them or their seedscontrolled imports and exports through acts including importlicences. The 1993 text set out personal-use, export, transport, possession, purchase, saletrading and exchangetreatment rules under Yemen’s national drug law.[@1,3] The agriculture minister may license government bodiesplant provisions reached every stage of growth and included seeds. Stalk fibres and seeds treated so they could not germinate were exempt parts. Government departments and scientific institutes to cultivate a prohibited plantcould obtain growing licences for research, subject to imposed conditions.[@1,2] ## Five yearsKeeping cannabis for yourself carried five years The personal-use Article 38 applies where a person possesses provision covered holding, buysbuying, producesproducing or manufactures a narcotic drug—or grows, possesses or buys a scheduled plant—preparing drugs and growing listed plants for consumption or personal use without lawful, outside the authorised medical or statutory authorisationlegal circumstances. The punishment isIt prescribed a five years in-year prison sentence.[@1,2] The court may order an addictedlaw also punished knowingly being present where drugs were being consumed in premises prepared for that purpose, with up to one year in prison. It exempted specified close relatives of the person intowho prepared the premises.[@1] ## Treatment involved living in a centre A court could replace the personal-use sentence with commitment to a treatment institution insteadcentre when dependence was established. SomeoneA committee decided when the person could leave, and the stay had to last at least six months.[@1,2] The law also offered protection from prosecution to a user who voluntarily presents forentered treatment is not prosecuted, but. That person likewise remained until the law specifies institutional stays committee decided on release, within a period of at least six months and no more thanto two years for that route.[@1,2] ## Capital offences Article 33 imposes deathUnpaid supply faced the harshest penalties Supplying drugs for unauthorised export or import with intent to trafficconsumption without payment, and for producing, extracting, separating or manufacturing narcotics with that intent. Article 34 permits facilitating consumption outside authorised circumstances, carried death or twenty-five years for conduct including possession, sale, delivery and transport with intent. The same alternatives applied to traffic,trading and for operatingpreparing or running premises for drug consumption. Article 35 applies the same Importing or manufacturing narcotics for trade carried death.[@1] In December 2025, [officials in Sana’a reviewed proposed amendments](/history/yemen-orsanaa-twentydrug-fivelaw-year range to giving narcotics for consumption without payment or facilitating their useamendment-draft-2025/). Harm Reduction International independently summarised those provisions and recorded that at least one drug trafficker was executed in 2008. It also The Justice Ministry reported death sentences from that periodcalls for deterrent penalties and clearer procedures, while cautioning through its evidence that practice cannot be inferred merely fromwith further steps needed to submit the statutory maximumdraft. The law remains the basis of the severe framework described on the [Yemen profile](/country/ye/). In sets out the indexpersonal-use, 1993 tightens enforcement from an already prohibited baseline:growing and supply provisions of the recorded score falls from 3 to 1 because death became an available drug penalty1993 law. The other five segment scores remain unchanged. [@4]

sources

Yemen — Law 3 of 1993, Arabic text published by the Public Prosecution Yemen — Law 3 of 1993 with schedules, Arabic text held by the House of Representatives Aden — Dangerous Drugs Ordinance 13 of 1960, original gazette supplied to the UN Sana’a Justice and Human Rights Ministry — review of a draft amendment to the 1993 drug law, 17 December 2025 Harm Reduction International — The Death Penalty for Drug Offences, Global Overview 2010 Yemen — reproduced text of Law No. 3 of 1993 (Mohamah.net, Arabic)

Code, design and documents 2 files

docs/DATA-MAINTENANCE.md +11 −0
@@ -1486,2 +1486,13 @@ verified growing and supply penalties correct its exact score from 13.5 to 10.
 The original pre-1964 cannabis scope remains open, and the research note records
 the limits of the aggregate estimate and enforcement snapshot.
+
+A [Yemen and Aden history pass](research/history-yemen-gap-2026-10-25.md) on
+25 October 2026 adds Aden’s 1942 cannabis trade ban, its 1947 preparation-list
+extension, reported fines in 1952, the replacement ordinance published in 1961,
+and Sana’a’s 2025 amendment proposals. Two articles explain the Aden framework
+and Yemen’s 1993 penalties and treatment routes. The 1993 law now uses its Arabic
+issuance clause to date commencement to 30 March. The profile gains verified
+cannabis schedules, non-germinating-seed exceptions and collateral consequences;
+its score remains 2. Aden’s territorial limits and the open northern/South Yemeni
+sequence are recorded in the research note. The English translation’s treatment
+and commencement errors were resolved against Arabic page images.

docs/research/history-yemen-gap-2026-10-25.md +109 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# Yemen: Aden controls and the national drug law
+
+Research date: 25 October 2026. Yemen had four history entries, including a broad
+first-restriction estimate. This pass adds five entries and an Aden article, rewrites the 1993 article, and
+provides a more precise, primary-sourced account of the national law. Maintenance, writing, score
+levels and book-research rules were reviewed before drafting. No book was used.
+
+## Sources read and applied
+
+- [Aden's government report for 1952](https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1631392/files/E_NR-1952_30-EN.pdf),
+  E/NR.1952/30, all four PDF pages read. Printed pp. 2–3 describe the 1942 drug
+  ordinance and explicitly say cannabis imports and sales were prohibited. They
+  record eight hemp cases, 1.75 kg seized, fines for all eight accused, confiscation
+  and destruction. The report gives 145 shillings but does not make clear whether
+  this is each fine or a total; the event does not resolve that ambiguity. Ethiopia
+  as the principal source is attributed to the accused, not independently verified.
+  The cover calls this the annual report for 1952, prints a 13 July 1952 document
+  date, and also “New York, 1953.” The enforcement event uses reporting year 1952,
+  not an invented publication day. Its opium-register population figures are
+  internally inconsistent and are not applied. The 1942 entry is verified against
+  this later government account, not an original 1942 statute that was not found.
+- [Aden Government Notice 54 of 5 April 1947](https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1296144/files/e-nl-1949-58-59-e.pdf),
+  reproduced in E/NL.1949/58–59, printed p. 5/PDF p. 4. All pages read; notice
+  visually checked. It adds preparations made from cannabis extract or tincture
+  except those capable only of external use. The other notice on the page concerns
+  different drugs in 1948. The event uses year precision: the notice is dated
+  5 April, but a separate gazette publication/commencement date was not established.
+- [Aden Ordinance 13 of 1960 in the original gazette reproduction](https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1296146/files/e-nl-1961-26-e.pdf),
+  E/NL.1961/26, all 13 pages read, compared with the complete
+  [UNODC transcription](https://www.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/yem/dangerous-drugs-ordinance-1960_html/Dangerous_Drugs_Ordinance_13-60.pdf).
+  Governor C. H. Johnston assented on 22 December 1960; the gazette is dated
+  5 January 1961. Sections 3–9 govern raw cannabis, resin, imports/exports,
+  growing and powers to regulate possession/production/distribution. Section 22
+  gives ten years/20,000 shillings in the Supreme Court or twelve months/5,000
+  shillings in a magistrate's court, with fine alternatives or combinations.
+  Section 28 repeals the old ordinance and preserves compatible rules and licences.
+  The schedule retains the internal/external cannabis-preparation distinction.
+  Neither the text nor a separate commencement notice established the exact start;
+  the year-1961 event expressly describes publication. It is not a claim that
+  cannabis growing was lawful before this replacement law.
+- [Yemen's 1993 Arabic law on the Public Prosecution website](https://www.agoye.gov.ye/page.php?id=304)
+  read through all articles and the relevant schedules; compared with the
+  [House of Representatives Arabic PDF](https://yemenparliament.gov.ye/uploads/posts/documents/2018/10/1019201893432579.pdf).
+  The full PDF was text-extracted; relevant pages 8, 10, 16 and 38 examined, and
+  pages 8, 10 and 38 rendered for visual verification. Article 38 provides five
+  years for personal-use holdings/growing, possible residential treatment for
+  established dependence, and protection from prosecution for a user voluntarily
+  entering treatment. Court-ordered treatment has a six-month minimum. Voluntary
+  admission is six months to two years, with committee release. Article 56 says
+  the law operates from issuance; the signature is 30 March 1993. The prosecution
+  copy identifies Gazette issue 6 of 1993, but no original gazette image was read.
+  Schedule 1 names cannabis; schedule 5 includes male and female plants; schedule 6
+  exempts stalk fibre and seeds treated against germination. Articles 33–35 specify
+  the different capital/25-year supply penalties. Articles 36, 43 and 8 support
+  the added collateral-consequence section. Existing qat context remains separately
+  sourced and was not used to infer a cannabis rule.
+- [English translation held by UNODC](https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/yem/1993/law_on_control_narcotics_93_html/LAW_3-93control_of_illicit_trafficking_and_abuse_or_narcotics.pdf)
+  read for comparison at articles 28–40, 56 and cannabis schedules. It incorrectly
+  renders the court-ordered treatment minimum as a maximum and article 56 as
+  starting on publication. The two Arabic copies agree on the wording; the Arabic
+  PDF images confirm the minimum and issuance clause. The English version is
+  therefore not the authority for those claims. It also differs in details of
+  repeat admissions and schedule 6; those details are not inferred from it.
+- [Sana'a Justice Ministry account of 17 December 2025](https://moj.gov.ye/NewsD/11896)
+  read in full, alongside its [28 July 2024 committee report](https://moj.gov.ye/NewsD/2199).
+  The later account describes a draft amendment, explanatory memorandum, proposals
+  for deterrent penalties and procedural changes, and further submission procedures.
+  This supports a proposal entry, not a claim that penalties changed. Officials are
+  identified by their Sana'a institutional setting. This account is separate from
+  the internationally recognised government's existing 2025 enforcement figures.
+
+## Scope, scoring and unresolved work
+
+The four Aden entries concern the colony only. They are context on today's Yemen
+timeline and do not impose the colony's rules on northern Yemen or the surrounding
+protectorate. The 1942 and 1961 entries make their dependence on a later official
+account and a replacement text clear in the source locators. The 1947 entry concerns
+a product-list extension; the 1952 report is an enforcement observation. Explicit
+unscored reasons accompany the legal-change categories. National scores remain
+unchanged at 2, and the 1993 snapshot keeps the existing 5-to-2 transition. This
+pass improves its date and explanation rather than inventing a newly verified
+pre-1993 national regime.
+
+The original 1942 ordinance, its precise commencement, pre-1942 Aden controls,
+the separate northern regime and post-independence South Yemen remain priority
+gaps. The national 1925–1961 aggregate estimate remains provisional. The 1993 law
+is not presented as the first prohibition. Search did not establish a subsequently
+enacted amendment; the December 2025 ministry report still calls the changes a
+draft. This is not an exhaustive 2026 legislative or case-law audit, and the
+profile's reporting figures remain limited to the territory stated by their source.
+
+An incidental search result identified Oman's September 2026 replacement drug law
+([Decree 67/2026](https://qanoon.om/p/2026/rd2026067/)); it is a priority lead for a
+separate current-law pass. Its full provisions have not been checked here.
+
+## Validation
+
+All 37 history tests and six answer/profile tests passed. The final production build
+passed with 4,127 pages. Parsed comparisons confirmed five new checked events,
+only one revised existing event, unchanged current scores and preserved unrelated
+profile context. Both articles have 350–500 words, four headings and valid cited
+source lists and history links. Rendered checks validated 69 citation targets,
+internal history links, clean JSON/CSV exports, the final country summary and the
+unchanged score chain; the chain audit reports no flagged steps. Desktop checks
+covered both articles, mobile checks the 1993 article and Yemen profile, with no
+horizontal overflow. The Aden desktop and 1993 mobile screenshots were visually
+inspected for headings, article text, score panels and references.
+Local source files and page images remain in ignored `tmp/history-yemen-gap-2026-10-25/`.
+Existing staged/unstaged source-archive changes are excluded from the content commit.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.