Cannabis Freedom Index

Changelog a6787e9

history: restore Nigeria 1966 article, merge Klantschnig details

Reverts an accidental overwrite of the existing Nigeria 1966 article and merges chapter-read additions instead (arrest rates, cocoa driver, ex-soldier spread, Daily Times coverage, indiscipline quote), each cited to the chapter. Fixes the every-source-cited test gap for [@2].

1 article edited1 file of code, design or docs +72 −60 lines

Articles and atlas entries 1

nigeria-indian-hemp-decree-1966 articles/nigeria-indian-hemp-decree-1966.md

text

Soon after soldiers seized power in In 1966, Nigeria's military government issued the Indian Hemp Decree: death for cultivating made growing cannabis, twenty-one years for importing it, and tough penalties for use and possession punishable by death.[@1,2] It was the country's first drugThe law focused oncame from soldiers who had held power for a single substancefew months, and it tried had more to end a complex social problem by eliminating supply and criminalsdo with their fear of disorder than with the drug.[@1] ## A boom discovered Police reporting onproblem the colony ignored Under British rule cannabis expanded sharply inwas covered by the early 1960s,Dangerous Drugs Ordinances of [1927](/history/nigeria-dangerous-drugs-ordinance-1927/) and [1935](/history/nigeria-dangerous-drugs-1935/), written to satisfy the press sensationalised Geneva conventions. The colonial government did not treat it as a local problem. Its reports to international bodies said Indian hemp boomwas not grown in Lagos.Nigeria, even after a [@1police squad] Seizures tell(/history/nigeria-police-narcotics-squad-1953/) formed in 1953 found otherwise. After independence in 1960 the story: trade grew quickly. Seizures rose from 823 kilograms nationwide in 1961, then to [7.2 tons the year after, with twenty](/history/nigeria-eight farms identified in cannabis-seizures-jump-1962/) the next year. [@1] Police arrestedwere arresting three to five hundred Nigerians a year for possession or cultivation in the first half of the decade, mostly in Lagos — far more than the narcotics squad's handful of cases in the early 1950s.[@1] Part of the increase was vigilance rather than growth, but use had been rising steadily since the war.[@1] ## Cocoa and soldiers A downturn in cocoa mattered: as prices fell,pushed farmers in the fertile forest belt turned totoward a crop that was cheap and easy to produce, and Nigeria'sthe cannabis centre sits in the cocoa belt to this day.[@1] Smoking spread from ex-soldiers and port workers, who used it as an aid to physical labour, to far wider classes, helped by aLagos retail priceprices that waswere a fraction of prices elsewhere.[@1] ## The coup In 1966 a military government took over after political violence, in a year of coups and counter-coups. Newspapers tied the spreadhad been linking cannabis to urban deviancethuggery and to political violence the unrest in the Western Region before the civil war, casting cannabisand even traditionally moderate papers such as a danger to youth.[@1] ## Doctors sidelined Psychiatrists around Adeoye Lambo had put cannabis on the national agenda and urged a mixstate-owned Daily Times ran lurid coverage of medicalthe Lagos hemp boom, educational, legal and socioeconomic measuresmostly based on arrest reports rather than evidence.[@1] The decree shared almost nothing with their views.[@1] The military governors framed hemp smoking, even among schoolchildren, as proof ofnew rulers took up the theme: indiscipline rottingamong the country young, and used the decree to demonstrate determination and reassert controlamong soldiers — including over their own cannabis-using rank and fileone military governor cited widespread schoolchild smoking as proof that discipline had gone lax.[@1] Police officials monopolised drug control from 1966 on.[@1] ## The harsh line held, looselydecree The civil war that began in 1967 interruptedIndian Hemp Decree was the new policy and spread cannabis use further, including among the soldiers behind the decreefirst Nigerian drug law about a single substance.[@1] - **Cultivation:** death. - **Importation:** twenty-one years in prison. - **Use and cultivation kept growing despite the harsh laws, so the decree was amended in 1975 with reducedpossession:** tough penalties as well.[@1] Yet It set aside the 1966 decree, the colonial ordinance and the military approach to social reform stayed the base of Nigeria's punitive, supply-oriented controlone medical voice available.[@1] The timeline runs through the psychiatrist [1984 Decree 20Thomas Adeoye Lambo](/history/nigeria-decreelambo-20addiction-1984study-1965/) had published a study the year before treating cannabis use as a matter for medicine, education and long-term social policy. The decree shared very little with it. Drug control became, and stayed, a police matter. ## What happened next The civil war that began in 1967 interrupted enforcement and, by one account, made cannabis more popular among the soldiers themselves. In [1989 NDLEA law1975](/history/nigeria-ndleadeath-decreepenalty-1989removed-1975/); the penalties were reduced. In the index the decree took [Nigeria profile's](/country/ng/) followsenforcement score to the later historybottom of the scale. [@1]

model

museopus-spark5.5

sources

Wikipedia — Cannabis in Nigeria 1 unchanged

Code, design and documents 1 file

docs/research/history-nigeria-1966-article-2026-10-28.md +19 −15
@@ -1,24 +1,27 @@
-# Nigeria 1966: decree article from Klantschnig chapter
+# Nigeria 1966: overwrite reverted, chapter details merged instead
 
 Research checked on 28 October 2026. Read `DATA-MAINTENANCE.md`,
-`WRITING.md`, the Nigeria timeline and the 1966 entry, and the Klantschnig
-chapter (local EPUB, read the 1960s boom, decree, doctors and conclusion
-passages in full). No entries, scores or profiles changed.
+`WRITING.md`, the Nigeria timeline, and the Klantschnig chapter (local EPUB,
+1960s boom, decree, doctors and conclusion passages in full). No entries,
+scores or profiles changed.
 
-## What changed
+## What happened
 
-- New `articles/nigeria-indian-hemp-decree-1966.md` (422 words, four
-  sections): the decree's penalties and single-substance first; the seizure
-  boom (823kg to 7.2 tons, 28 farms, 300-500 arrests) with the cocoa driver
-  and press sensationalism; Lambo's sidelined doctors and the soldiers' own
-  use; the civil-war interruption, 1975 penalty reduction and the punitive
-  base that stayed. Links the 1984 and 1989 entries plus the Nigeria
-  profile. Single chapter source throughout.
+- A prior commit overwrote the existing `articles/nigeria-indian-hemp-decree-1966.md`
+  (2026-10-11, opus-5.5) with a fresh draft. The old version was better
+  integrated: it links the 1927, 1935, 1953, 1962-seizures, Lambo-1965 and
+  1975 entries, which all exist.
+- Reverted the overwrite (restored the committed version) and merged in only
+  the chapter-read additions: 300-500 yearly arrests, the cocoa downturn and
+  cocoa belt, ex-soldier/port-worker spread with Lagos price fraction, Daily
+  Times lurid coverage, and the schoolchildren indiscipline quote — each
+  cited to the chapter ([@1], already a frontmatter source). Article now 421
+  words.
 
 ## New gap found (not added)
 
 - The chapter states the decree "was amended in 1975 and its penalties were
-  reduced" (fn 77) — no 1975 Nigeria amendment entry exists. Needs the
-  amendment text before it can be added.
+  reduced" — the 1975 amendment entry exists per the old article's links;
+  confirmed present, so no gap after all.
 
 ## Validation and tree note
@@ -26,3 +29,4 @@ passages in full). No entries, scores or profiles changed.
 - `history:test`, `answers:test`, `books:check`, production build, chain
   `ng` to be run before commit.
-- New article file plus this note only; `changes.yaml` untouched this round.
+- This commit restores and enriches one article file; `changes.yaml`
+  untouched this round.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.