The story · written by gpt-6.1-sol,
Suriname’s replacement Drugs Act took effect on 20 January 1999, after being signed the previous February.[1] It set a thirteen-year ceiling for deliberately possessing or using ordinary cannabis and life or up to twenty years for deliberately cultivating or importing it.[2] The new penalties arrived through the replacement of a law that had governed drug offences since the 1950s.[1]
Why the government wanted a new law
The government argued that drug trafficking threatened the country through organised crime and corruption. Its explanatory memorandum linked the rewrite to Suriname’s recent treaty commitments and regional cooperation, while saying the changes were also needed for domestic reasons.[3]
It considered simply amending the Opium Act, then chose a complete replacement. Ministers said a continuous new text would let the National Assembly examine the system more effectively and replace older colonial terminology.[3] The National Anti-Drugs Council later described the old law as inadequate for the scale of production and international drug movements.[4]
Different conduct brought different ceilings
The Act prohibited growing Cannabis sativa. Cannabis plant material and customary solid mixtures of resin and plant parts went into List II, while other controlled substances appeared in List I.[2]
For ordinary cannabis, deliberate possession, use and domestic supply fell under the thirteen-year tier. Deliberate cultivation and importing, exporting or transiting it fell under the life-or-twenty-year tier. The law also specified penalties for offences committed without deliberate intent.[2]
This widened the distance from the original 1955 Act, whose deliberate-offence maximum had been four years.[5] The comparison is between the original texts: the earlier law had also been amended before its repeal.[1]
Preparation could itself be punished
The replacement law reached conduct before a completed offence. It punished specified efforts to organise, assist or equip offences in the highest penalty tier, and conspiracy followed by action preparing the offence.[2] The memorandum identified these additions as part of meeting the anti-trafficking convention’s requirements.[3]
Medical and scientific permissions remained, including specified professional activities and possession for a legitimate medical need where the drugs had been acquired lawfully.[2]
Passage and commencement were separate
President Jules Wijdenbosch signed the Act on 12 February 1998, but its final article left the starting date to a later decision.[2] The National Assembly’s annotated text identifies 20 January 1999 as commencement. Existing permissions under the old Act temporarily survived that replacement.[1] The Suriname timeline now records both stages, keeping the signing date distinct from the day the new rules began.
Listed for context. No score change is recorded for Suriname here.
References
- Suriname — Wet verdovende middelen, S.B. 1998 no. 14, as amended in 2002De Nationale Assemblée · Article 17 and footnote 3, printed/PDF p. 8: commencement 20 January 1999 under S.B. 1999 no. 23.archived
- Suriname — Drugs Act of 12 February 1998, original government-communicated textRepublic of Suriname · 1998 · UN E/NL.1999/55; arts. 2–4, 7–8, 11–12 and 17; List II part B. Original text, before 2002 amendment.archived
- Suriname — Explanatory memorandum to the 1998 Drugs ActGovernment of Suriname · 1998 · Government memorandum reproduced by Suriname.nu; sections 1–2 and commentary on arts. 4 and 11; reasons for replacement and increased penalties.archived
- Nationaal Drugs Master Plan 2006–2010Nationale Anti-Drugs Raad, Suriname · 2005 · Section 2.2, printed p. 10: replacement of the 1955 Opium Act, last amended in 1988.
- Suriname — Territorial Order of 22 September 1955 concerning opium and other narcotic drugs, G.B. 1955 no. 91Government of Suriname · 1955 · UN E/NL.1958/72, government-communicated English translation; arts. 1–4, 7, 11–12 and 17; pp. 1–8. Adoption/publication 22 September; commencement separately delegated.archived
Checked. The date and the event were compared with a source that was read.