Cannabis Freedom Index

Changelog ac6737e

Extend Curaçao history and clarify cannabis exemptions

5 history entries added2 history entries edited1 country profile edited2 articles written1 article edited1 file of code, design or docs +537 −148 lines

History changes.yaml

Added 5

Edited 2

Curaçao renews guidance to drop most cases involving up to 25 grams

tags

thresholds, sentencing

title

Curaçao applies a new drug-prosecution guidelinerenews guidance to drop most cases involving up to 25 grams

description

Guideline 2018/01 took effect, replacing the July 2015Curaçao’s renewed prosecution guideline. Its cannabis table called for directs seizure and a dismissal, potentially conditional, dismissal for cannabis in theits 0–25 g band, with exceptions for other offencesand a fine request up to NAf 500 in its 25–50 g band.[@1] Exceptions cover minors, repeat offending, signs of dealing, minorsanother offence and specified circumstancessettings such as carnival parades, workplaces or government buildings.[@1] The 25–50 g band specified a fine demand upguideline replaced July 2015 instructions and leaves cultivation cases to NAF 500individual assessment; larger amounts used halfCuraçao’s later replacement law kept the cocaine/heroin demand. Cultivation remained prohibitedunderlying possession and required individual assessmentgrowing bans. These are prosecution instructions[@1, not a lawful possession allowance or mandatory court sentences.2]

sources

Curaçao — Opiumlandsverordening 2024, Publicatieblad 2024 No. 74 1 unchanged

Curaçao keeps its cannabis ban and prohibits sales advertising

category

othertightening

title

Curaçao bringskeeps its replacement Opium Ordinance into forcecannabis ban and prohibits sales advertising

description

The Opiumlandsverordening 2024 replacedCuraçao’s replacement drug law kept the earlier ordinance. It retained a banbans on cannabis cultivation in Article 2agrowing, possession and restrictions on cannabisuse, resinand prohibited public messages promoting controlled-drug sales or supply, preparationsexcept purely medical or scientific information.[@1] It also gave the government a route to create exemptions by decree, extractssubject to prior parliamentary approval and tinctures in Articles 3a and 4, alongside statutory exceptiona 30-making powersday period in which Parliament can request legislation to govern commencement. This was a replacement legal framework rather than Curaçao's first cannabis prohibition.[@1] The gazette records issue on 5 July 2024law retained medical exceptions for licensed professionals and Article 18 specifies operation the following daylawfully obtained personal treatment supplies, establishingand took effect on 6 July commencement, the day after publication.[@1]

related

curacao-prosecution-guideline-2018, curacao-replacement-opium-law-1964, curacao-opium-exemptions-advice-2024

tags

retail, trade, patients

unscored

The added advertising restriction concerns commercial promotion where recreational supply remains prohibited; a future exemption requires a separate decree. Neither changes a whole personal-freedom segment by itself.

Countries and states 1 file

Curaçao countries/cw.yaml

summary

On paper cannabis is treated like cocaineCannabis possession, with maximum penalties up to life imprisonmentuse, under an Opium Ordinance renewed in 2024growing and supply remain prohibited. In practiceProsecutors’ guidance calls for confiscation and dismissal in the prosecution guideline is mild: up to 0–25 g is confiscated and the case droppedband, and upsubject to 50 g ends inexceptions, and a fine. Medical cannabis was proposed request in 2019 and the ordinance lets doctors and pharmacists supply hemp25–50 g band. The law provides medical exemptions for authorised professionals and lawfully obtained treatment supplies. A proposed medical purposes, but no working programme has been confirmed-cannabis industry was still awaiting parliamentary approval in April 2023.

segments › possession › text

The Opium Ordinance 2024 bans importing, possessing and dealing in hemp andPossession of cannabis or resin, punishable, if is prohibited. For intentional offences the statute permits life imprisonment, bya fixed term up to 24 years or life in prison or, a fine of up to NAf 6.25 million, or the fixed term and fine together. The prosecution guideline in force since December 2018[@law] Prosecutors’ guidance is farmuch milder: up to 25 g is confiscatedconfiscation and a potentially conditional dismissal in the case dismissed, conditionally or not, and 0–25 to 50 g bringsband, and a fine ofrequest up to NAf 500 in the 25–50 g band. Exceptions are possession together with another offenceinclude minors, repeat offencesoffending, signs of dealing indications, minors,another offence and placesspecified settings such as carnival parades, workplaces or government buildingsworkplaces.[@guide]

segments › possession › sources

opl24law, om18guide

segments › cultivation › text

Growing plantsany plant of the genus Cannabis is banned outrightprohibited. The guideline leaves sentencing for grows to case-by-case assessment[@law] Prosecutors assess grow cases individually, given the range ofconsidering plant numbers and, location, professionalism and involvement.[@guide] The government may create exemptions through a separate decree, subject to prior parliamentary approval; the ordinance itself sets no personal plant allowance.[@law]

segments › cultivation › sources

opl24law, om18guide

segments › enforcement › text

Small amounts are confiscated withoutThe prosecution, guideline calls for confiscation and only larger quantities lead to prison demandsdismissal in the 0–25 g band, set atsubject to exceptions; from 50 g upwards it uses half those forthe cocaine/heroin sentencing request. First[@guide] Its general instructions favour partly suspended requests for first offenders who are residents are usually given partly suspended sentences, with a three years'-year probation period.[@guide] These are prosecutors’ instructions; the statute retains much higher maximum penalties.[@law]

segments › enforcement › sources

om18guide, law

segments › sharing › text

SupplyingThe law prohibits supplying cannabis is dealing underextracts and tinctures without the ordinancerelevant authorisation, with no exception for sharing without payment; signsand prohibits possessing or using herbal cannabis and resin outside its exceptions.[@law] The prosecution guideline removes its small-quantity dismissal approach where there are indications of dealing remove the leniency for small amounts.[@guide]

segments › sharing › sources

opl24law, om18guide

segments › consumption › text

The ordinance bansexpressly prohibits using (aanwenden) cannabis as well as possessing it, but small personal amounts are not prosecutedresin and extracts outside its exceptions. There is no legal place to use[@law] Prosecutors’ cannabis table provides a small-quantity dismissal approach, but excludes minors and possession atcircumstances including carnival parades or in public, workplaces, government buildings is excluded from the leniencyand detention facilities.[@guide]

segments › consumption › sources

om18law, guide

segments › access › text

No legal adult-use source. The ordinancelaw exempts authorised pharmacists and dispensing doctors who supply hemphandling extracts and tinctures for medical purposes, and patientssubject to the applicable medicines rules. It also exempts people who need itcan show that lawfully obtained amounts are needed for their own medical use and obtained it lawfully. A 2019 bill to set up a medical cannabis system with a Medicinal Cannabis Curaçao Office went to parliament, but a working programme has[@law] Recreational possession and use remain prohibited; the prosecution guideline’s small-quantity dismissal policy does not been confirmedprovide a licensed retail route.[@law,guide]

segments › access › sources

opl24law, cc19guide

context › production › text

No licensed cannabis productionCannabis cultivation is knownprohibited. The minister may grant licenceslaw provides permissions for specified scientific purposesor medicines-related activities and a separate route for exemptions by decree, to wholesale medicine tradersrequiring prior parliamentary approval.[@law] The 2019 bill proposed a dedicated medical-cannabis bureau and to manufacturers of medicinesgrower system; opposition lawmakers were still seeking approval in April 2023.[@bill19,opposition]

context › production › sources

opl24law, bill19, opposition

context › products › text

No legalThe ordinance controls herbal cannabis products. Extracts and resin separately from extracts and tinctures. Medical professionals’ handling of hempextracts and tinctures, and lawfully obtained amounts needed for personal treatment, fall within specified exemptions.[@law] Public messages promoting controlled-drug sales or supply are banned under a separate article of the ordinanceprohibited, with an exception for purely medical or scientific information.[@law]

context › products › sources

opl24law

context › medical › text

Under the 2024 ordinance,Authorised pharmacists and dispensing doctors may prepare, hold and dispense hemp forhave medical purposes,-purpose exemptions for handling extracts and patients may hold what theytinctures, subject to medicines rules. People who establish their need for their own medical use if obtained lawfully obtained personal treatment supplies also have an exemption. In September[@law] The 2019 industry proposal concerned a bill went to parliament to build a medical cannabis system,bureau working with a Medicinal Cannabis Curaçao Office to deal with growers and sellers; whether patients can actually obtain cannabis could not be confirmedit remained a bill awaiting approval in the April 2023 reporting.[@bill19,opposition]

context › medical › sources

opl24law, cc19bill19, opposition

context › consequences › text

The 2024 ordinance replacedreplacement law retained the 1960 Opium Ordinance to implement the UN conventionscannabis prohibitions and to ban recreational use of nitrous oxide. Minors found withmedical exceptions, added a user amount of cannabis are prosecutedsales-advertising restriction and provided a route for future exemptions requiring parliamentary approval.[@law] The earlier medical-production bill had stalled after two parliamentary discussions, so that treatment can be imposedprompting opposition calls for answers in April 2023.[@opposition]

context › consequences › sources

opl24law, om18opposition

context › clubs › text

NoThe ordinance provides no recreational club exemption from the cannabis clubs are known,possession and there is no coffeeshop toleranceuse bans.[@law] Prosecutors’ small-quantity dismissal policy excludes cases with signs of dealing.[@guide]

context › clubs › sources

om18law, guide

context › visitors › text

There is no legal supply for anyone. Importing cannabis is an offence under the ordinanceUnauthorised importation, possession and theuse remain prohibited.[@law] The prosecution guideline treats’s preference for partly suspended requests concerns resident first offenders; it generally does not seek a probation report for non-residents differently when it comes to suspended sentences.[@guide]

context › visitors › sources

opl24law, om18guide

sources

Curaçao Chronicle — Opposition parties want approval of medical cannabis bill, 7 April 2023 3 unchanged

Articles and atlas entries 3

curacao-prosecution-guideline-2018 articles/curacao-prosecution-guideline-2018.md

text

On 1 December 2018, a regional Curaçao renewed its drug-prosecution guideline took effect for Curaçao, Sint Maarten and the Caribbean Netherlandsguidance on 1 December 2018. ItsFor cannabis table combined seizure within the possibility of dismissal for small quantities0–25 g band, while retaining exceptionsit directs confiscation and a separate approach to cultivationdismissal that may carry conditions. It replaced a guideline dated 1 July 2015. The 2018 document therefore records next band, 25–50 g, calls for prosecutors to seek a particular versionfine of prosecution policyup to NAf 500, rather than proving the first introduction of leniency in these jurisdictionswith exceptions for circumstances including minors, repeat offending and suspected dealing.[@1] ## A shared instructionpolicy for the Dutch Caribbean The prosecutor-general addressed the chief prosecutors of Curaçao, [Sint Maarten](/history/sint-maarten-prosecution-guideline-2018/) and Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba. The new document identified itself as an instruction under the statutory framework for the public prosecution service. Its tables concerned the demandsreplaced instructions dated 1 July 2015 and set out how prosecutors should make. They should be distinguished from the underlying offencesapproach drug cases and from the sentences courts ultimately imposesentencing requests. The general discussion described quantity as[@1] Quantity was a guide that could be supplemented by evidence about, alongside matters such as a person’s role, the duration of dealing and other the money earned. For repeat offending within five years, the requested penalty could increase by 50–100%, depending on the circumstances.[@1] ## Small quantities could end with dismissal The cannabis table In the 0–25 g band, the table called for seizure provided confiscation and dismissal, which could bepotentially conditional. The next dismissal in its lowest band, 25–50 g, specifiedthen a fine demand up to NAF 500, with a corresponding US-dollar figure forrequest in the jurisdictions using that currencynext. From 50 g upwards, it referred toused half the demandsentencing request in the cocaine/heroin table.[@1] These were enforcement bands operated within a prohibition frameworkcriminal drug law. They did not create a lawful retail market or a legal allowanceCuraçao’s later consolidated ordinance continued to keepprohibit cannabis without possession and use, while containing specified medical exceptions.[@2] The guideline also began its general case-handling section with instructions to arrest and hold people found with controlled drugs, subject to decisions required by the risk of seizureparticular circumstances. A dismissal could therefore follow an encounter with the criminal-justice system.[@1] ## Circumstances could overrideExceptions changed the tableresponse The smalllow-quantity responses had express exceptions. These includedcannabis approach excluded cases involving another offence, repeat offending, indications of dealing and cases involvingor minors. The footnote It also named special settings, includinglisted possession during carnival processionsparades, workplaces at work, in government buildings andor in detention facilities. The document's broader provisions allowed increased demands for repeat offences. Consequently[@1] For minors, weight alone did not settle how prosecutors should handleeven a case. ## Cultivation remained separate A dedicated passage stated that cannabis cultivation0–5 g user quantity was prohibited and that growto be prosecuted to support assistance from addiction-care or other services. Grow cases required individual assessment. It identified, taking account of plant numbers, location, professionalism and involvement as relevant considerations.[@1] ## Prosecutors’ requests remained distinct from the law The personalguidance favoured partly suspended sentencing requests for resident first offenders, with a three-quantity table therefore supplied no equivalent small-plant allowanceyear probation period. Nor should it be assumed that a kilogram or gram category could simply be converted into a permitted number of plants. For [Curaçao's timeline](/country/cw/)It generally did not seek probation reports for non-residents, while allowing the event documentsdefence to put relevant personal circumstances before the rules governing prosecution decisions from a verified commencement datecourt. The later [@1] Curaçao’s [2024 replacement ordinancelaw](/history/curacao-opium-ordinance-2024/) is a separate legislative development within kept its cannabis prohibitions, medical exceptions and high statutory maxima. The [country profile](/country/cw/) explains that historylaw alongside the separate instructions governing prosecutors’ requests.[@3]

model

gpt-6

sources

Curaçao — Opiumlandsverordening 1960, consolidated text published 15 May 2019 Curaçao — Opiumlandsverordening 2024, Publicatieblad 2024 No. 74 1 unchanged

Code, design and documents 1 file

docs/research/history-curacao-gap-2026-10-23.md +126 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+# Curaçao history gap and statutory exemptions — 23 October 2026
+
+This batch adds five entries to a three-entry timeline: the inherited ordinance's
+1964 commencement, the 2019 medicinal-industry advisory opinion and subsequent
+bill, opposition demands in 2023 and the 2024 review of exemption powers. It
+revises the 2018 prosecution-policy entry and the 2024 replacement-law entry,
+adds articles to the 2019 advice and 2024 law, and rewrites the existing 2018
+article. All six segment explanations and six context blocks now use inline
+citations. Numerical scores and all status classifications are preserved.
+
+## Primary sources and chronology
+
+Research downloads, extraction scripts and verification evidence are retained in
+`tmp/history-curacao-gap-2026-10-23/`. Exact source metadata is in `sources.json`.
+
+- Overheid.nl's original-ordinance metadata was downloaded and read. It records
+  signature on 28 March 1960 and commencement on **1 June 1964** under the
+  decree of 29 April 1964. The archived Antilles consolidation identifies the
+  replaced ordinance as that of 30 July 1929. Curaçao's own 2019 consolidation
+  identifies the inherited law and its acquisition of Curaçao-law status in 2010.
+  These sources establish continuity and commencement, not the original 1960
+  wording of every cannabis definition, penalty or medical exception.
+- The official Curaçao 2019 consolidated ordinance was downloaded in full
+  (`oldlaw2019.pdf/.txt`). Its relevant definitions, cultivation prohibition,
+  extracts/herbal-cannabis provisions, medical exceptions and penalties were read.
+  It is used as a later consolidation, without backdating those detailed rules
+  to 1964. It has no counterpart to the 2024 advertising article.
+- The original 2018/01 prosecution guideline was reread at pages 1–3 and 5–6
+  from the retained `tmp/pdfs/dutch-caribbean-2026-10-20/` download. It provides
+  confiscation and potentially conditional dismissal in the printed 0–25 g band;
+  the next printed 25–50 g band requests a fine up to NAf 500. The overlapping
+  endpoints are retained rather than silently resolving a boundary the table
+  does not resolve. From 50 g the cocaine/heroin requests are halved. Minors,
+  repeat offending, dealing indications, another offence and listed settings
+  are exceptions. The separate minor discussion covers even 0–5 g and assistance
+  services. General instructions include arrest/custody, resident first-offender
+  requests and differing treatment of non-residents. These are instructions,
+  not measured practice or mandatory judicial sentences.
+- The Advisory Council's complete 2019 substantive opinion was downloaded and
+  read (`advice2019.pdf/.txt`, printed pages 1–8). Its appendix was consulted for
+  context but editorial corrections there were not turned into events. Although
+  the PDF filename contains September, the signed opinion is dated **16 July
+  2019**, visually verified on PDF page 8. The catalogue says publication on
+  17 July. The opinion questions economic substantiation, licensing procedures,
+  financing of harvest purchases, repayment guarantees and the proposed bureau's
+  legal capacity. Its request for changes is not a veto or a refusal of a licence.
+- The full Curaçao Chronicle report of 18 September 2019 was downloaded and
+  read (`news2019.html/.txt`). It says the bill reached Parliament the preceding
+  week, so the bill event uses month precision, not the report date as an invented
+  exact filing day. It describes a proposed office, conditional on approval.
+- The full 8 October investor-interest report was read (`investors2019.html/.txt`).
+  Alvin Daal's nine applications/business plans and job/revenue projections do not
+  establish issued cultivation licences, actual jobs or realised revenue. It is
+  supporting context in the article, not a separate scored reform.
+- The full 7 April 2023 opposition report was downloaded and read
+  (`opposition2023.html/.txt`). It identifies MAN/KEM demands, Michelangelo
+  Martines, Giselle McWilliam and the earlier role of Suzanne Camelia-Römer.
+  It establishes that the bill was still awaiting approval then. It does not
+  certify its status throughout 2026. NU.CW's page returned a verification screen;
+  that search snippet was not substituted for a read source.
+- The 2024 Advisory Council opinion was downloaded as complete HTML
+  (`advice2024.html/.txt`); relevant general discussion, exemption procedure and
+  article 8a comments were read. The body dates signature to **15 May 2024**,
+  while the page labels publication as 6 June. The opinion describes pressure
+  from the planned financial-action evaluation and asks for explanation and
+  examples supporting the proposed broad exemption power. A guessed PDF address
+  returned 404 and is not presented as a recovered PDF.
+- The official 2024 law PDF, retained in the October 20 Dutch Caribbean research
+  directory, was reread at definitions, articles 2a–8a, 11 and 15–19. The final
+  text requires prior parliamentary approval for the government's intention to
+  create exemptions by decree, with a 30-day opportunity for Parliament to ask
+  that commencement be governed by legislation. This must not be replaced by
+  contemporary reporting about a draft suggesting no parliamentary role.
+  Articles 17–18 repeal the old ordinance and commence the new one the day after
+  publication: issued **5 July**, effective **6 July 2024**.
+
+## Profile corrections and scoring
+
+The former profile confused prosecutors' requests with actual sentences, treated
+medical professional exemptions too broadly and asserted no legal products or
+production without evidence of actual availability. The revised text states the
+specific rules instead. Article 3a handles extracts/tinctures, article 4 herbal
+cannabis/resin, and article 7 supplies specified exemptions. Professional handling
+of extracts and tinctures is subject to medicines rules; lawful personal treatment
+supplies require proof of need and lawful acquisition. An exemption is not proof
+of an operating pharmacy programme, patient registry or stock availability.
+
+The cultivation prohibition remains in article 2a. General exception-making power
+is not itself a personal plant allowance or a grant of a cultivation licence.
+The new advertising restriction excludes purely medical/scientific information;
+its breach has up to four months' detention or a fourth-category fine, or both.
+The 2024 event is now tightening, with an explicit unscored explanation: promotion
+of supply in an already prohibited recreational market changes no whole personal
+freedom band, while any future exemption requires a separate decree.
+
+The six current scores remain possession 4, cultivation 1, enforcement 4, sharing 1,
+consumption 2 and access 1. Medical remains `limited`. The score chain has no
+flagged transitions. The date when small-quantity leniency first began remains
+unresolved: 2018 replaced 2015 instructions, so it is not scored as the first
+introduction of leniency. Recovering earlier instructions and reconstructing the
+historical vector remains work for a future pass.
+
+The first-ban estimate remains in place. Searches found leads to the 1929 law,
+a 1935 international-control amendment and a 1956 penalty amendment, but did not
+recover enough original cannabis-specific coverage to replace the estimate or
+backdate a cannabis penalty. The later ordinance and 1929 replacement reference
+alone do not prove the first cannabis ban.
+
+## Validation and commit isolation
+
+The scoped verifier checks all seven touched entries, category and tag validity,
+titles, checked flags, related links, inline citation keys and use of listed
+sources. It checks source-identity deduplication across event and article text.
+Articles contain 358, 383 and 380 words, each with four headings and country and
+contextual history links. All twelve profile blocks have valid inline citations;
+current scores, dependency and status classifications match the starting snapshot.
+
+The production build passed: **3,872 pages in 34.20 seconds**. All **84 checked
+rendered citation links** resolved to unique numbered references; six tag pages,
+history exports and the profile API passed. The exact exported score remains
+**24.5**, medical Limited. `git diff --check` passed. Generated `site/` output
+was deleted after checking; source material and scripts remain. A separate Git index assembles the commit from only these seven
+history objects, the Curaçao profile, three articles and this note. Parent-to-commit
+semantic checks ensure unrelated history entries are unchanged. Concurrent edits,
+including Ohio history/profile changes and the source archive, remain outside
+this commit.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.