Cannabis Freedom Index

Changelog 6f47a32

Document Turkmenistan drug controls and missing legal history

5 history entries added2 history entries edited1 country profile edited3 articles written1 file of code, design or docs +477 −62 lines

History changes.yaml

Added 5

Edited 2

Turkmenistan reserves controlled cannabis growing for permitted enterprises

date

20172018-1101-2501

title

Turkmenistan replaces its narcotics lawreserves controlled cannabis growing for permitted enterprises

description

A newTurkmenistan’s replacement drug law on narcotic drugsrestricted growing controlled plants to permitted enterprises and institutions within state quotas, psychotropic substanceswith use confined to industrial, precursorsmedical and countering their illegal tradescientific purposes.[@1] It prohibited consuming narcotic drugs without a doctor’s order and provided for court-ordered treatment for diagnosed dependent users who avoided treatment and continued using.[@1] Adopted in November 2017, it replaced the 2004 law on 1 January 2018. It bans cultivation of listed plants except by enterprises with a permit, within state quotas.[@1]

sources

Turkmenistan Parliament — law on narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors Закон Туркменистана «О наркотических средствах, психотропных веществах, прекурсорах и противодействии их незаконному обороту» (FAOLEX PDF)

tags

home-growing, treatment, patients, science

unscored

Replacement control law; enterprise permissions do not establish a personal growing or medical-cannabis access route.

related

turkmenistan-narcotics-law-2004, turkmenistan-drug-allocations-2016, turkmenistan-criminal-code-2023

Turkmenistan adopts a national drug-control law

title

Turkmenistan passes its narcoticsadopts a national drug-control law

description

Law 238-II onTurkmenistan adopted a law covering narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and, precursors set the legal basis for state control and for measures against illicit traffickingtheir illegal trade on 9 October 2004.[@1] It remained the principal drug law until its replacement took effect on 1 January 2018, retaining enterprise permits and state quotas for controlled cultivation.[@1]

sources

Turkmenistan Parliament — law on narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors Council of Europe Pompidou Group — Turkmenistan: drug situation and drug policy

tags

trade, home-growing

unscored

Adoption and later replacement verified; original 2004 operative provisions and earlier controls require retrieval before assigning a score change.

related

turkmenistan-drug-allocations-2016, turkmenistan-narcotics-law-2017

Countries and states 1 file

Turkmenistan countries/tm.yaml

summary

Very strict enforcement with long sentencesCannabis remains illegal. Small-amount possession and use can bring a fine or administrative detention; criminal possession carries up to five years.

segments › possession › text

Illegal underThe Administrative Offences Code covers acquiring or holding a zero-tolerance policyminor quantity without intent to supply, and use, with a fine of one to three base units and confiscation or up to 15 days’ administrative detention; quantities are set in separate regulations.[@admin] The Criminal Code punishes even the use’s ordinary non-supply offence allows a fine of narcotics with40–100 base units or up to five years in prison; someone who voluntarily surrenders a small personal amount may be sparedrepeated or group offending carries three to ten years. Criminal exemption requires voluntary surrender and active help against drug offences.[@code]

segments › possession › sources

wikiadmin, code

segments › cultivation › text

Article 19 of the narcotics law forbidsSowing or growing listedprohibited drug-containing plants; only, expressly including cannabis, allows up to two years’ corrective labour or two to five years in prison, with possible additional residence restrictions. Repeated, group or large-scale offending carries five to ten years.[@code] Controlled cultivation is reserved to permitted enterprises and institutions may be permitted to grow them, within state quotas and solely for industrial, medical and scientific purposes. The sources read give no penalties for growing.[@law17]

segments › cultivation › sources

code, law17

segments › enforcement › text

Among the most closedThe administrative small-amount offence allows a fine or up to 15 days’ detention.[@admin] Criminal drug offences carry longer terms, including five to twelve years for supply and punitive systemsfifteen to twenty-five years in the region, with little independent information on how cases are handledmost serious supply tier.[@code]

segments › enforcement › sources

enadmin, code

segments › sharing › text

Under the narcotics law only licensed enterprisesUnauthorised supply and institutions may releaseholding drugs with intent to supply carry five to twelve years, sellrising to eight to twenty years for repeated, group or distribute narcotics (Article 23)large-quantity offending and fifteen to twenty-five years in the highest tier.[@code] The sources read give no sentences for unlawful supplydrug law defines acquisition to include receiving drugs as a gift or in exchange.[@law17]

segments › sharing › sources

code, law17

segments › consumption › text

Article 45 of the narcotics law forbids consuming narcoticsConsuming narcotic drugs without a doctor'’s prescriptionorder is prohibited. British travel advice says anyone found guilty[@law17] The Administrative Offences Code includes use in its small-amount drug offence, punishable by a fine of possessingone to three base units and confiscation or using illegal drugs could face a lengthy prison sentence in very basic conditionsup to 15 days’ detention.[@admin]

segments › consumption › sources

law17, fcdoadmin

segments › access › text

NoneRecreational supply remains prohibited under the criminal drug-supply rules.[@code] The narcotics law lets only enterprisesgeneral controlled-medicine route requires special prescriptions and institutions acquire narcotics, forlicensed pharmacies in the purposes the law provides (Article 24), and forbids consuming them without a doctor's prescription (Article 45)state healthcare system.[@law17]

segments › access › sources

code, law17

context › production › text

NoneThe drug law allows controlled plants to be grown only by permitted enterprises and institutions, within state quotas and for industrial, medical or scientific purposes. Scientific and educational drug handling is reserved to specially licensed state institutions.[@law17]

context › production › sources

wikilaw17

context › products › text

None. Even nasvayThe drug law places controlled substances in separate lists and restricts their production, a chewing tobacco common across Central Asia, is bannedstorage and supply. Controlled medicines for patients require special prescriptions through licensed state pharmacies.[@law17]

context › products › sources

en, wikilaw17

context › medical › text

The retained sources do not establish whether a medical cannabis programme operatesgeneral controlled-medicine rules require special prescriptions and supply through licensed state pharmacies. The health ministry sets the dispensing and prescription procedures.[@law17]

context › medical › sources

law17

context › consequences › text

Users are registeredThe drug law provides for registration and medical monitoring of people diagnosed with drug dependence. A court can be sent toorder compulsory treatment where a diagnosed person avoids observation and treatment and continues using; specified occupations can be restricted after medical assessment, with a right to challenge the decision.[@law17]

context › consequences › sources

enlaw17

context › planting › text

Article 19 of the 2017 narcotics law bansThe cultivation of listed plants, defined asrule covers sowing and growing, controlled plants and allows it onlyreserves permission to enterprises holding a permit,and institutions within state quotas.[@law17] The lawCriminal Code expressly names hempcannabis among narcotic-containingthe plants and does not mention seedscovered by the unauthorised cultivation offence.[@code]

context › planting › sources

law17, code

context › visitors › text

There is no legal recreationalRecreational drug supply remains prohibited.[@code] The administrative code permits a fine or detention for anyonesmall-amount possession and use.[@admin] British travel advice says a person found guilty of possessing or usingwarns that illegal drugs could face adrug possession or use can lead to lengthy prison sentencesentences in very basic conditions.[@fcdo]

context › visitors › sources

wikicode, admin, fcdo

context › clubs › text

No cannabis clubs are known,Controlled cultivation is limited to permitted enterprises and the law leavesinstitutions, within state quotas; drug consumption requires a doctor’s order.[@law17] Unauthorised supply is a criminal offence, leaving no room for them:lawful recreational growing cannabis -and supplying it to another person are both prohibited-sharing club route.[@code]

context › clubs › sources

wikilaw17, code

sources

Turkmenistan Parliament — law on narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors Turkmenistan Parliament — Criminal Code, new edition Turkmenistan Parliament — Administrative Offences Code Закон Туркменистана «О наркотических средствах, психотропных веществах, прекурсорах и противодействии их незаконному обороту», 25 November 2017 (FAOLEX PDF) Wikipedia — Cannabis in Turkmenistan Eurasianet — Turkmenistan struggles to combat drugs 1 unchanged

Articles and atlas entries 3

Code, design and documents 1 file

docs/research/history-turkmenistan-gap-2026-10-24.md +47 −0
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Turkmenistan: missing criminal-law and control-law history
+
+Reviewed 24 October 2026. Five new entries, two revised entries and three new articles. The country previously had four history entries and no articles. All revised profile text now uses inline citations. No score or existing score vector changed.
+
+## Sources read and findings
+
+Downloads and text extractions are retained in ignored `tmp/history-turkmenistan-gap-2026-10-24/`.
+
+- `code2023.html/.txt`: Parliament's Russian Criminal Code, new edition approved by law of 17 April 2022, commencement expressly 1 January 2023. Read enabling law, articles 327–330, 333–335 and the relevant amendment notes. The official page includes later amendments, rather than being an untouched 2022 document. No amendment note is attached to the cited articles 327–330; the drug chapter's 12 April 2025 amendment note concerns article 333, not those penalty ranges. Parliament is used as the primary citation.
+  - Article 327: supply or possession with supply intent 5–12 years; repeated/group/large-quantity 8–20; highest tier 15–25. Additional confiscation and residence restrictions are possible. The ordinary and middle-tier surrender exemption requires both voluntary surrender and active cooperation.
+  - Article 328: ordinary non-supply offence fine 40–100 base units OR up to five years; repeated/group 3–10. Criminal exemption similarly requires surrender AND active assistance, not simply handing over a small amount.
+  - Article 330: expressly includes sowing/growing cannabis, ordinary corrective labour up to two years OR 2–5 years in prison, with possible residence restrictions; repeated/group/large quantity 5–10. The official Parliament page has a malformed highest-tier phrase equivalent to “fifteen five” in part 3. Do not quote a definitive highest cultivation ceiling from that text; retrieve original gazette or authoritative correction.
+- `adminpage.html/.txt` and `admin.pdf/.txt`: Parliament's current Administrative Offences Code and Justice Ministry PDF. Read enabling laws, article 22(4), article 82 and amendment notes. Article 82 covers minor-quantity acquisition/possession without supply intent, and use: fine 1–3 base units plus confiscation OR administrative detention up to 15 days. Quantity limits come from separate regulations. Administrative surrender exemption does not include the criminal code's additional cooperation test. Article 22(4) makes administrative liability conditional on the conduct not attracting criminal liability.
+  - Code commenced 1 January 2014, but article 82 has amendments dated 1 March 2014, 2 February 2015 and 3 June 2017. Those amending texts were not recovered. The current article is therefore NOT backdated to January 2014, and no invented 2014 cannabis reform event was created.
+- `law2018.html/.txt`: Parliament's complete Russian drug-control law, signed 25 November 2017, commencement 1 January 2018 under article 54. Read definitions, scheduling, enterprise allocation/cultivation/handling rules, articles 26–31 and 45–54. Cannabis is expressly named among drug-containing plants in the acquisition definition. Article 19 reserves controlled cultivation to permitted enterprises/institutions within state quotas; cabinet sets procedure and industrial/medical/scientific uses. This is statutory permission architecture, not proof that growers have been licensed or a patient cannabis programme operates.
+  - Articles 28–29 give the general controlled-medicine dispensing/prescribing rules; articles 45–49 give use prohibition, examination, registration, voluntary care, compulsory treatment and occupational restrictions. Court-ordered treatment concerns diagnosed dependent users who avoid treatment/observation and continue using. Anonymity requested for voluntary treatment has an official law-enforcement request exception.
+  - Article 54 expressly identifies the 9 October 2004 law and repeals it from January 2018. This supports the revised 2004 entry's adoption/replacement facts, not detailed claims about the original law's contents. Original 2004 text remains a retrieval task; the pre-existing Council of Europe source returned 403 and was replaced with the primary repeal/adoption citation for these narrow facts.
+- `amend2016.html/.txt`: State news agency publishes the law signed 12 January 2016, portal date 25 January. Read complete amendment. It changes the definition of distribution to institutional allocation in specified amounts under cabinet procedures. The history date is ADOPTION; commencement is official publication, whose exact gazette date is not independently established here. Do not equate the portal date with gazette commencement.
+- `moratorium.html/.txt`: Parliament's complete law signed 6 January 1999. Paragraph 1 bars courts from imposing death from 1 January; paragraphs 2–3 cover people already sentenced and special-regime custody. Event date is the law's signing/adoption, with the earlier application date stated. Do not claim a specified new prison term, release or automatic pardon.
+- `ombudsman2017.pdf/.txt`: official national Ombudsman report, printed page 11, read relevant passage. Gives January moratorium and full abolition on 28 December 1999. Its constitutional article numbering differs from some other historical accounts; public entry does not repeat a number. This is retrospective official evidence of abolition, not the original December instrument. Treaty accession/ratification dates are not inferred from its rhetoric.
+- Amnesty International Report 1997, Turkmenistan, read complete relevant account on Refworld through web tool (direct scripted download returned 403). It reviews events in 1996, despite its 1997 title and catalogued January 1997 date. Reports 123 executions solely for drug trafficking, absence of published official statistics, and concern that the overall number was higher. Event is dated 1996 and explicitly attributed to Amnesty. This is ALL-DRUG reporting: no cannabis-only execution count or named cannabis defendant is claimed. The Mary prison disturbance was read as wider context but omitted from the final article to keep its focus on sentencing.
+- FCDO current Turkmenistan safety-and-security page, illegal-drugs paragraph, rechecked through web tool. It warns of lengthy sentences and basic conditions for illegal possession or use. It supplies practical travel context, not statutory fine/quantity detail.
+
+## Additional sources and rejected leads
+
+`codeold.pdf/.txt` is UNODC SHERLOC's 1997 code consolidated through 9 November 2013, not the original 1997 edition. Read header and old drug articles 292–293: supply 3–10 and ordinary non-supply possession up to five years. It cannot by itself establish the immediately pre-2023 ranges or that every subsequent change occurred in 2023; the new event states the verified new-code ranges without claiming an unverified comparison.
+
+Justice Ministry's code web page downloaded as `minjustcode.html/.txt` did not expose the full code to the local parser. Its indexed drug provisions corroborated Parliament; Parliament supplies the cited full text. No repeated download workaround was needed.
+
+An Amnesty appeal concerning Ashirgeldy Sadyyev was an OPIUM case, so no separate cannabis history event was added. Neither general all-drug execution reports nor a drug-law licence route establish cannabis-specific implementation or patient access.
+
+## Scoring and remaining gaps
+
+All six current scores remain unchanged: possession 0, cultivation 0, enforcement 1, sharing 0, consumption 0, access 0; exact score 2. Existing 1934 first-ban vector is preserved. This batch substantially improves the text but does not certify that the inherited score allocation is correct.
+
+Required follow-ups:
+
+- Recover the cannabis-specific schedules and minor/large/especially-large quantity regulations, and establish interaction of administrative article 82 with criminal article 328 in practice. The old profile's claim that use itself necessarily carries five years was removed; the verified administrative tier and criminal possession offence are now separately stated.
+- Audit possession/consumption scores against that administrative tier once the applicable cannabis quantity rule is read. Audit cultivation 0 against ordinary corrective labour and 2–5-year imprisonment; do not silently treat it as mandatory imprisonment.
+- Recover the original Soviet/Turkmen first controls, capital drug-offence provisions and subsequent amendments before reallocating the timeline. The 1934 event's implied immediate collapse to today's score remains weak. Adding an invented pre-1999 capital vector would falsely back-project execution exposure to the 1934 growing ban. Death events therefore carry explicit unscored reasons pending reconstruction, while current enforcement already reflects no death penalty.
+- Recover original 2004 law, 2014/2015/2017 administrative amendments and original 2022 gazette. Do not backdate later consolidated wording.
+- Determine whether any cannabis medicine or enterprise cannabis cultivation permission actually operates. General medical permissions alone do not justify upgrading medical status or access. Current medical-none classification is retained; profile medical context describes only the verified general dispensing rules.
+- Obtain reliable recent sentencing/application data before asserting how frequently the administrative route or imprisonment is used. No “zero tolerance” or comparative enforcement ranking is retained as a factual finding.
+
+## Validation
+
+Local verifier checks article word counts (350–500), section counts, citation coverage, tags/categories, related links, unchanged score vectors and inline profile references. Production build passed with 4,038 pages. Rendered verification passed for 81 citation links, numbered references, tag pages, history JSON/CSV, profile API and score exports; exact score remains 2 and medical classification None. The isolated commit includes only this batch’s seven history blocks, country profile, three articles and this note. The temporary `site` build was deleted after checking; research files and logs are retained. Other actors’ `source-archive.json` index and working changes are excluded from the commit.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open.